Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T09:06:23.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The tryphê of the sybarites: a historiographical problem in Athenaeus*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 January 2010

Robert J. Gorman  and
Vanessa B. Gorman
Robert J. Gorman
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Vanessa B. Gorman
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

A large number of the most informative fragments of the Hellenistic Greek historians are transmitted by Athenaeus. Unlike the frequently jejune evidence provided by scholiasts, lexicographers and the like, these texts allow us to draw historiographical conclusions about lost writers: on this basis, scholars have posited, for example, the place of a given author in the Hellenistic ‘schools’ of history. The importance of Athenaeus as a source for history-writing between Xenophon and Diodorus calls for detailed study of the Deipnosophist's method of citing these lost authors. The present article focuses on Athenaeus' testimony concerning the downfall of Archaic Sybaris through luxury and excess in order to show that certain phrases, sentence patterns and even trains of thought can be reliably identified as belonging to Athenaeus rather than the cited authority. This discovery entails surprising results: traditions ascribing the destruction of Sybaris to morally corrosive luxury are late and of little historical value. More generally, the debilitating effects of luxury cannot serve as an exemplum supporting the claim that Hellenistic writers tended to explain historical events through moral causes; apparent evidence for this causal nexus is better assigned to Athenaeus than to the historians he names. In view of these conclusions, a cautious reassessment of all Athenaeus’ testimony on fragmentary historians is appropriate.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Hellenic Studies , Volume 127 , November 2007 , pp. 38 - 60
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Ambaglio, D. (1990) ‘I Deipnosofisti di Ateneo e la tradizione storica frammentaria’, Athenaeum 78, 51–64Google Scholar
Ampolo, C. (1993) ‘La città dell'eccesso: per la storia di Sibari fino al 510 a.C.’, in Stazio and Ceccoli (1993) 213–54Google Scholar
Bernhardt, R. (2003) Luxuskritik und Aufwandsbeschränkungen in der griechischen Welt (Historia Einzelschrift 168, Stuttgart)Google Scholar
Bowra, C.M. (1941) ‘Xenophanes, Fragment 3’, CQ 35, 119–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braund, D. and Wilkins, J. (eds) (2000) Athenaeus and his World. Reading Greek Culture in the Roman Empire (Exeter)Google Scholar
Brown, T. (1958) Timaeus of Tauromenium (Berkeley and Los Angeles)Google Scholar
Brunt, P. (1980) ‘On historical fragments and epitomes’, CQ 30, 477–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bugno, M. (1999) Da Sibari a Thurii. La fine di un impero (Naples)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cozzoli, U. (1980) ‘La τρυφή nella interpretazione delle crisi politiche’, in Tra Grecia e Roma. Temi antichi e metodologie moderne (Rome) 133–46Google Scholar
del Corno, D. (1993) ‘L'immagine di Sibari nella tradizione classica’, in Stazio and Ceccoli (1993) 9–18Google Scholar
de Sensi Sestito, G. (1988) ‘La storia italiota in Diodoro: considerazioni sulle fonti per i libri VII-XII’, Critica storica 25, 403–28Google Scholar
Fisher, N. (1992) Hybris. A Study in the Values of Honour and Shame in Ancient Greece (Warminster)Google Scholar
Flashar, H. trans. (1981) Aristoteles: Mirabilia (Berlin)Google Scholar
Flower, M. (1994) Theopompus of Chios (Oxford)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geffcken, J. (1892) Timaios’ Geographie des Westens (Berlin)Google Scholar
Gorman, V.B. (2001) Miletos, the Ornament of Ionia (Ann Arbor)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacob, C. (2001) ‘Ateneo, o il Dedalo delle parole’, in Canfora, L. (su progetto di), Ateneo, I Deipnosofisti: i dotti a banchetto (Rome) xi-cxviGoogle Scholar
Lombardo, M. (1983) ‘Habrosyne e habrá nel mondo greco arcaico’, in Modes de contacts et processus de transformation dans les sociétés antiques. Actes du colloque de Cortone (24–30 mai 1981) (Pisa and Rome) 1077–1103Google Scholar
Nenci, G. (1983) ‘Tryphé e colonizzazione’, in Modes de contacts et processus de transformation dans les sociétés antiques. Actes du colloque de Cortone (24–30 mai 1981) (Pisa and Rome) 1019–30Google Scholar
Nyikos, L. (1941) Athenaeus quo consilio quibusque usus subsidiis Dipnosophistarum libros composuerit (Basel)Google Scholar
Passerini, A. (1934) ‘La TPYΦH nella storiographia ellenistica’, Studi italiani di filologia classica 11, 35–56Google Scholar
Pelling, C.B.R. (1979) ‘Plutarch's method of work in the Roman Lives’, JHS 99, 74–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelling, C.B.R. (1985) ‘Plutarch and Catiline’, Hermes 113, 311–29Google Scholar
Pelling, C.B.R. (2000) ‘Fun with fragments’, in Braund, and Wilkins, (2000) 171–90Google Scholar
Stazio, A. and Ceccoli, S. (eds) (1993) Sibari e la Sibaritide. Atti del trentaduesimo Convegno di studi sulla Magna Grecia, Taranto-Sibari, 7–12 Ottobre 1992 (Taranto)Google Scholar
Van der Stockt, L. (1999) ‘A Plutarchan hypomnema on self-love’, AJPh 120, 575–99Google Scholar
Vattuone, R. (1991) Sapienza d'occidente. Il pensiero storico di Timeo di Tauromenio (Bologna)Google Scholar
Walbank, F. (2000) ‘Athenaeus and Polybius’, in Braund, and Wilkins, (2000) 161–9Google Scholar
Zecchini, G. (1989) La cultura storica di Ateneo (Milan)Google Scholar