Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T15:07:01.111Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

REVIEWS - The Verbal Complex in Subordinate Clauses from Medieval to Modern German. By Christopher D. Sapp (Linguistik Aktuell/ Linguistics Today, 173.) Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 2011. Pp. ix, 225. Hardcover. € 99. $149.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 February 2014

Shannon A. Dubenion-Smith
Shannon A. Dubenion-Smith*
Affiliation:
Western Washington University
*
Department of Modern and Classical Languages, Western Washington University, 516 High Street, Miller Hall 218C, Bellingham, WA 98225, USA [shannon.dubenion-smith@wwu.edu]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Germanic Linguistics , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , March 2014 , pp. 71 - 82
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Germanic Linguistics 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Behaghel, Otto. 1932. Deutsche Syntax: Eine geschichtliche Darstellung, vols. I–IV. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Besch, Werner. 1968. Zur Entstehung der neuhochdeutschen Schriftsprache. Zeitschrift für Deutsche Philologie 87. 405-426.Google Scholar
Besten, Hans den. 1983. On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules. On the formal syntax of West Germania (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 3), ed. by Abraham, Werner, 47–131. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bies, Ann. 1996. Syntax and discourse factors in Early New High German: Evidence for verb-final word order. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania MA thesis.Google Scholar
Büring, Daniel. 2006. Focus projection and default prominence. The architecture of focus, ed. by Molnár, Valéria & Winkler, Susanne, 321–346. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1993. A null theory of phrase and compound stress. Linguistic Inquiry 24. 239-297.Google Scholar
Ebert, Robert Peter. 1981. Social and stylistic variation in the order of auxiliary and non-finite verb in dependent clauses in Early New High German. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Deutschen Sprache und Literatur 103. 204-237.Google Scholar
Evers, Arnold. 1975. The transformational cycle of Dutch and German. Utrecht, The Netherlands: University of Utrecht dissertation.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 1992. Theory and description in generative syntax: A case study in West Flemish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland. 2004. Language change versus grammar change: What diachronic data reveal about the distinction between core grammar and periphery. Diachronic clues to synchronic grammar (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 72), ed. by Fuß, Eric & Trips, Carola, 131–160. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Koopman, Hilda, & Szabolcsi, Anna. 2000. Verbal complexes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sankoff, David, Tagliamonte, Sali, & Smith, Eric. 2005. GoldVarb X: A variable rule application for Macintosh and Windows. Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto. Available at http://individual.utoronto.ca/tagliamonte/goldvarb.htm.Google Scholar
Sapp, Christopher D. 2006. Verb order in subordinate clauses: From Early New High German to modern German. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University dissertation.Google Scholar
Sapp, Christopher D. 2011. The verbal complex in subordinate clauses from Medieval to Modern German (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 173). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Schmid, Tanja, & Vogel, Ralf. 2004. Dialectal variation in German 3-verb clusters: A surface-oriented optimality theoretic account. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 7. 235-274.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth O. 1984. Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stechow, Arnim von, & Sternefeld, Wolfgang. 1988. Bausteine syntaktischen Wissens. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Uriagereka, Juan. 2006. Towards a syntax of Proto-Basque. Studies in Basque and historical linguistics in memory of R. L. Trask, ed. by Lakarra, Joseba A. & Ignacio Hualde, José, 949–968. Bilbao: University of the Basque Country.Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, Susanne. 2006. Verb clusters, verb raising, and restructuring. The Blackwell companion to syntax, vol. 5, ed. by Everaert, Martin & van Riemsdijk, Henk, 229–343. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter. 1996. Verb clusters in continental West Germanic dialects. Microparametric syntax and dialect variation, ed. by Black, James & Motapanyane, Virginia, 229–258. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar