Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T03:40:58.317Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rising grammatical awareness in a French-speaking child from 18 to 36 months: uses and misuses of possession markers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2012

MARIE LEROY-COLLOMBEL  and
ALIYAH MORGENSTERN
MARIE LEROY-COLLOMBEL*
Affiliation:
University of Paris Descartes
ALIYAH MORGENSTERN*
Affiliation:
Sorbonne Nouvelle – Paris 3
*
Adresse pour correspondance: Marie Leroy-Collombel, Université Paris-Descartes, Faculté des Sciences Humaines et Sociales-Sorbonne, 45, rue des Saints-Pères, 75270 Paris cedex 06, France e-mail: marie.leroy@parisdescartes.fr
Aliyah Morgenstern, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle - Paris 3, 5 rue de l'Ecole de médecine, 75006 Paris, France e-mail: Aliyah.Morgenstern@univ-paris3.fr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Children's awareness of grammar can be traced in the way they use and particularly misuse morphology and constructions in what Clark (2001) calls ‘emergent categories’. We focus our longitudinal study on a French speaking child's use of possession markers (Anaé, Paris Corpus), and her creative nonstandard productions (la poupée de moi for ma poupée/my doll). We provide a detailed analysis of the ways in which she moves between a global strategy thanks to which she locates, identifies and uses whole blocks or constructions without analyzing them, and a more analytic strategy that parallels her progressive mastery of the semantic and syntactic complexity of grammatical morphemes.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of French Language Studies , Volume 22 , Special Issue 1: First language acquisition of French grammar (from 10 months to 4 years old) , March 2012 , pp. 57 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bowerman, M. (1985). What shapes children's grammars? In: Slobin, D. (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Brown, R., (1973). A First Language: The Early Stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 1257–1319.Google Scholar
Budwig, N. (1995). A Developmental-Functionalist Approach to Child Language. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bühler, K., (1926) Les lois générales d'évolution dans le langage de l'enfant, Journal de psychologie, XXIII, 6: 597–607.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L. (1985). Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caët, S. (this issue). Développement de la référence à soi chez une enfant de 1;05 à 3;00: de l'influence de l'input à la reconstruction du système.Google Scholar
Chaudenson, R., Valli, A. and Véronique, D. (1986). The dynamics of linguistic systems and the acquisition of French as a second language. Studies in second language acquisition, 8: 277–292.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1959). Review of B. F. Skinner's ‘Verbal Behavior’, Language, 35-1: 26–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. (2001). Emergent categories in first language acquisition. In: Bowerman, M. and Levinson, S. C. (eds), Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 379–405.Google Scholar
Cohen, M.,(1924). Sur les langages successifs de l'enfant. In: Mélanges linguistiques offerts à M. J. Vendryes par ses amis et ses élèves, Paris, E. Champion, collection publiée par la société de linguistique, XVII, pp. 109–127.Google Scholar
Deutsch, W., and Budwig, N. (1983). Form and function in the development of possessives. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 22: 36–42.Google Scholar
Egger, M. E. (1879). Observations et réflexions sur le développement de l'intelligence et du langage chez l'enfant. Paris: Picard.Google Scholar
Eisenbeiss, S., Matsuo, A., Sonnenstuhl, I. (2009). Learning to encode possession. In: Mc Gregor, W. (ed.), The Expression of Possession. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 143–211.Google Scholar
Grégoire, A.,(1937). L'apprentissage du langage, les deux premières années. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
Heine, В. (1995). Possession: Cognitive Sources, Forces, and Grammaticalization. (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1979). A Functional Approach to Child Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1986). From meta-processes to conscious access—Evidence from children's metalinguistic and repair data. Cognition, 23 (2): 95–147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leroy, M. (2010). Eveil de la conscience grammaticale chez un enfant français entre 18 mois et 3 ans. In: Neveu, F., Muni Toke, V., Durand, J., Klingler, T., Mondada, L., Prévost, S. (eds), Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française - CMLF 2010. Paris: Institut de Linguistique Française.Google Scholar
Morgenstern, A., Parisse, C. et Sekali, M. (2009). A la source du futur: premières formes verbales dans les productions spontanées de deux enfants français de 18 mois à 3 ans. Faits de Langues. 33 – Le futur: 163–175.Google Scholar
Rondal, J.-A., Esperet, E., Gombert, J. E., Thibaut, J. P. et Comblain, A. (2000). Développement du langage oral. In: Rondal, J. A. et Seron, X. (eds), Troubles du langage: bases théoriques, diagnostic et rééducation. Brussels: Mardaga, pp. 107–178.Google Scholar
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal Behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In: Ferguson, C. A. and Slobin, D. I., (eds), Studies of Child Language Development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, pp. 175–208.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1985). Cross linguistic evidence for the Language-Making Capacity. In: Slobin, D. I. (ed.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition. Vol. 2: Theoretical Issues. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp.1157–1256.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar