Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T21:55:17.336Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stokes' cradle: normal three-body collisions between wetted particles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2010

C. M. DONAHUE ,
C. M. HRENYA ,
R. H. DAVIS ,
K. J. NAKAGAWA ,
A. P. ZELINSKAYA  and
G. G. JOSEPH
C. M. DONAHUE
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309–0424, USA
C. M. HRENYA*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309–0424, USA
R. H. DAVIS
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309–0424, USA
K. J. NAKAGAWA
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309–0424, USA
A. P. ZELINSKAYA
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309–0424, USA
G. G. JOSEPH
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309–0424, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: hrenya@colorado.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this work, a combination of experiments and theory is used to investigate three-body normal collisions between solid particles with a liquid coating (i.e. ‘wetted’ particles). Experiments are carried out using a Stokes' cradle, an apparatus inspired by the Newton's cradle desktop toy except with wetted particles. Unlike previous work on two-body systems, which may either agglomerate or rebound upon collision, four outcomes are possible in three-body systems: fully agglomerated, Newton's cradle (striker and target particle it strikes agglomerate), reverse Newton's cradle (targets agglomerate while striker separates) and fully separated. Post-collisional velocities are measured over a range of parameters. For all experiments, as the impact velocity increases, the progression of outcomes observed is fully agglomerated, reverse Newton's cradle and fully separated. Notably, as the viscosity of the oil increases, experiments reveal a decrease in the critical Stokes number (the Stokes number that demarcates a transition from agglomeration to separation) for both sets of adjacent particles. A scaling theory is developed based on lubrication forces and particle deformation and elasticity. Unlike previous work for two-particle systems, two pieces of physics are found to be critical in the prediction of a regime map that is consistent with experiments: (i) an additional resistance upon rebound of the target particles due to the pre-existing liquid bridge between them (which has no counterpart in two-particle collisions), and (ii) the addition of a rebound criterion due to glass transition of the liquid layer at high pressure between colliding particles.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 650 , 10 May 2010 , pp. 479 - 504
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Angel, R. J., Bujak, M., Zhao, J., Gatta, G. D. & Jacobsen, S. D. 2007 Effective hydrostatic limits of pressure media for high-pressure crystallographic studies. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 26–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnocky, G. & Davis, R. H. 1988 Elastohydrodynamic collision and rebound of spheres – experimental verification. Phys. Fluids 31, 1324–1329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnocky, G. & Davis, R. H. 1989 The influence of pressure-dependent density and viscosity on the elastohydrodynamic collision and rebound of 2 spheres. J. Fluid Mech. 209, 501–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, P. S. Y. & Cameron, J. 1962 Pressure viscosity characteristics of lubricating oils. J. Inst. Petrol. 48, 147–155.Google Scholar
Davis, R. H., Rager, D. A. & Good, B. T. 2002 Elastohydrodynamic rebound of spheres from coated surfaces. J. Fluid Mech. 468, 107–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, R. H., Serayssol, J. M. & Hinch, E. J. 1986 The elastohydrodynamic collision of 2 spheres. J. Fluid Mech. 163, 479–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donahue, C. M., Hrenya, C. M. & Davis, R. H. 2010 Stokes' cradle: adding a layer of complexity to Newton's cradle. Submitted.Google Scholar
Donahue, C. M., Hrenya, C. M., Zelinskaya, A. P. & Nakagawa, K. J. 2008 Newton's cradle undone: experiments and collision models for the normal collision of three solid spheres. Phys. Fluids 20, 113301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ennis, B. J., Tardos, G. & Pfeffer, R. 1991 A microlevel-based characterization of granulation phenomena. Powder Technol. 65, 257–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertz, H. 1882 On the contact of rigid elastic solids and on hardness. J. Reine Angew. Math. 94, 156–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, G. G., Zenit, R., Hunt, M. L. & Rosenwinkel, A. M. 2001 Particle-wall collisions in a viscous fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 433, 329–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kantak, A. A. & Davis, R. H. 2006 Elastohydrodynamic theory for wet oblique collisions. Powder Technol. 168, 42–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lian, G., Adams, M. J. & Thornton, C. 1996 Elastohydrodynamic collisions of solid spheres. J. Fluid Mech. 311, 141–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lian, G. P., Thornton., C. & Adams, M. J. 1993 A theoretical-study of the liquid bridge forces between 2 rigid spherical bodies. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 161, 138–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundberg, J. & Shen, H. H. 1992 Collisional restitution dependence on viscosity. J. Engng Mech.-ASCE 118, 979–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikami, T., Kamiya, H. & Horio, M. 1998 Numerical simulation of cohesive powder behaviour in a fluidized bed. Chem. Engng Sci. 53, 1927–1940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pepin, X., Rossetti, D. & Iveson, S. 2000 Modelling the evolution and rupture of pendular liquid bridges in the presence of large wetting hysteresis. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 232, 289–297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevens, A. B. & Hrenya, C. M. 2005 Comparison of soft-sphere models to measurements of collision properties during normal impacts. Powder Technol. 154, 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar