Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T00:01:22.173Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Particle-sampling statistics in laser anemometers: sample-and-hold systems and saturable systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2006

Robert V. Edwards  and
Arne Skov Jensen
Robert V. Edwards
Affiliation:
Chemical Engineering Department, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, U.S.A.
Arne Skov Jensen
Affiliation:
Electronics Department, Risø National Laboratory, DK 4000, Roskilde, Denmark
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The output statistics of a laser anemometer operating in a low particle density are discussed. A rigorous derivation is given for the influence of two popular data-handling algorithms on these statistics. In particular it is shown that the measured statistics can differ from those of the flow statistics and from the particle-arrival statistics. The variables that control the statistical regime are derived and quantitative estimates are given for their ranges of influence.

The first system discussed is a sample-and-hold system where the output is a piecewise-continuous signal obtained by holding the last processor measurement until a new one is obtained. The second system is one where an attempt is made to store all the measurements for processing, but which contains a rate-limiting device. Because of this device, some measurements may be lost when the particle rate is high. This system is referred to as a saturable system.

In both cases it is found that the statistics of the output depend on the product of the mean particle rate and the flow correlation time as well as the flow statistics. The statistics of the saturable system also depend on the ratio of the mean particle rate to the maximum rate at which measurements can be accepted by the system. Because of this, the statistics of both systems depend on the particle density.

Attainable conditions are demonstrated, where the output velocity measurement statistics are essentially identical with the flow statistics.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 133 , August 1983 , pp. 397 - 411
Copyright
© 1983 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bendat, J. S. & Peirsol, A. G. 1971 Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures. Wiley-Interscience.
Buchhave, P. 1975 Biasing errors in individual particle measurements with the LDA-counter signal processor. In Proc. LDA-Symp. 75, Copenhagen, p. 258.Google Scholar
Duräto, D. F. G., Laker, J. & Whitelaw, J. H. 1980 Bias effects in laser Doppler anemometry. J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum. 13, 000.Google Scholar
Edwards, R. V. 1979 How real are particle bias errors? In Laser Velocimetry and Particle Sizing (ed. H. D. Thompson & W. H. Stevenson), p. 79. Hemisphere.
Edwards, R. V. 1981 A new look at particle statistics in laser anemometry measurement J. Fluid Mech. 105, 317.Google Scholar
Erdmann, J. C. & Tropea, C. 1981 Statistical bias in laser anemometry. SFB 80/ET/198. Universität Karlsruhe Report.
George, W. K. & Lumley, J. L. 1973 The laser-Doppler velocimeter and its application to the measurement of turbulence J. Fluid Mech. 60, 321.Google Scholar
Giel, T. V. & Barnett, C. O. 1979 Analytical and experimental study of statistical bias in laser velocimetry. In Laser Velocimetry and Particle Sizing (ed. H. D. Thompson & W. H. Stevenson), p. 86. Hemisphere.
Hinze, J. O. 1959 Turbulence. McGraw-Hill.
Lading, L. & Edwards, R. V. 1975 The effect of measurement volume on laser Doppler anemometer measurements as measured on simulated signals. In Proc. LDA-Symp. 75, Copenhagen, p. 64.Google Scholar
Mclaughlin, D. K. & Tiederman, W. G. 1973 Biasing corrections for individual realization of laser anemometer measurements in turbulent flow Phys. Fluids 16, 2082.Google Scholar
Saleh, B. 1978 Photoelectron Statistics with Application to Spectroscopy and Optical Communication. Springer.
Stevenson, W. H., Thompson, H. D., Bremmer, R. & Roesler, T. 1980 Laser velocimeter measurements in turbulent and mixing flows – part II. Air Force Tech. Rep. AFAPL-TR-79-2009, Part II.Google Scholar