Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T05:25:45.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the turbulent Prandtl number in homogeneous stably stratified turbulence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2010

SUBHAS K. VENAYAGAMOORTHY  and
DEREK D. STRETCH
SUBHAS K. VENAYAGAMOORTHY*
Affiliation:
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1372, USA School of Civil Engineering, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4041, South Africa
DEREK D. STRETCH
Affiliation:
School of Civil Engineering, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4041, South Africa
*
†Email address for correspondence: vskaran@colostate.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, we derive a general relationship for the turbulent Prandtl number Prt for homogeneous stably stratified turbulence from the turbulent kinetic energy and scalar variance equations. A formulation for the turbulent Prandtl number, Prt, is developed in terms of a mixing length scale LM and an overturning length scale LE, the ratio of the mechanical (turbulent kinetic energy) decay time scale TL to scalar decay time scale Tρ and the gradient Richardson number Ri. We show that our formulation for Prt is appropriate even for non-stationary (developing) stratified flows, since it does not include the reversible contributions in both the turbulent kinetic energy production and buoyancy fluxes that drive the time variations in the flow. Our analysis of direct numerical simulation (DNS) data of homogeneous sheared turbulence shows that the ratio LM/LE ≈ 1 for weakly stratified flows. We show that in the limit of zero stratification, the turbulent Prandtl number is equal to the inverse of the ratio of the mechanical time scale to the scalar time scale, TL/Tρ. We use the stably stratified DNS data of Shih et al. (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 412, 2000, pp. 1–20; J. Fluid Mech., vol. 525, 2005, pp. 193–214) to propose a new parameterization for Prt in terms of the gradient Richardson number Ri. The formulation presented here provides a general framework for calculating Prt that will be useful for turbulence closure schemes in numerical models.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 644 , 10 February 2010 , pp. 359 - 369
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baum, E. & Caponi, E. A. 1992 Modelling the effects of buoyancy on the evolution of geophysical boundary layers. J. Geophys. Res. 97, 15513–15527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellison, T. H. 1957 Turbulent transport of heat and momentum from an infinite rough plane. J. Fluid Mech. 2, 456–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerz, T., Schumann, U. & Elghobashi, S. E. 1989 Direct numerical simulation of stratified homogeneous turbulent shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 200, 563–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregg, M. C. 1987 Diapycnal mixing in the thermocline. J. Geophys. Res. 92, 5249–5286.Google Scholar
Holt, S. E., Koseff, J. R. & Ferziger, J. H. 1992 A numerical study of the evolution and structure of homogeneous stably stratified sheared turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 237, 499–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itsweire, E. C., Helland, K. N. & Van Atta, C. W. 1986 The evolution of grid-generated turbulence in a stably stratified fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 162, 299–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivey, G. N., Winters, K. B. & Koseff, J. R. 2008 Density stratification, turbulence, but how much mixing? Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 40, 169–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kays, W. M. 1994 Turbulent Prandtl number – where are we? J. Heat Transfer. 116, 284–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kays, W. M. & Crawford, M. E. 1993 Convective Heat and Mass Transfer. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Komori, S., Ueda, H., Ogina, F. & Mizushina, T. 1983 Turbulence structure in stably stratified open-channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 130, 13–26.Google Scholar
Launder, B. E. 1975 On the effects of a gravitational field on the turbulent transport of heat and momentum. J. Fluid Mech. 67, 569–581.Google Scholar
Launder, B. E. & Spalding, D. B. 1972 Mathematical Models of Turbulence. Academic.Google Scholar
Mydlarski, L. 2003 Mixed velocity-passive scalar statistics in high-Reynolds-number turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 475, 173–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peltier, W. R. & Caulfield, C. P. 2003 Mixing efficiency in stratified shear flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 35, 135–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, S. B. 2000 Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rogers, M. M., Mansour, N. N. & Reynolds, W. C. 1989 An algebraic model for the turbulent flux of a passive scalar. J. Fluid Mech. 203, 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohr, J. J., Itsweire, E. C., Helland, K. N. & Van Atta, C. W. 1988 Growth and decay of turbulence in a stably stratified shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 195, 77–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumann, U. & Gerz, T. 1995 Turbulent mixing in stably stratified shear flows. J. Appl. Meteorol. 34, 33–48.Google Scholar
Shih, L. H., Koseff, J. R., Ferziger, J. H. & Rehmann, C. R. 2000 Scaling and parameterisation of stratified homogeneous turbulent shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 412, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shih, L. H., Koseff, J. R., Ivey, G. N. & Ferziger, J. H. 2005 Parameterization of turbulent fluxes and scales using homogeneous sheared stably stratified turbulence simulations. J. Fluid Mech. 525, 193–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srivat, A. & Warhaft, Z. 1983 The effect of a passive cross-stream temperature gradient on the evolution of temperature variance and the heat flux in grid turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 128, 323–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stretch, D. D., Rottman, J. W., Venayagamoorthy, S. K., Nomura, K. K. & Rehmann, C. R. 2010 Mixing efficiency in decaying stably stratified turbulence. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans. 49, 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, A. A. 1976 The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Venayagamoorthy, S. K. & Stretch, D. D. 2006 Lagrangian mixing in decaying stably stratified turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 564, 197–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, C. A. G. 1964 An experimental study of turbulence in a density-stratified shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 19, 221–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winters, K. B. & D'Asaro, E. A. 1996 Diascalar flux and the rate of fluid mixing. J. Fluid Mech. 317, 179–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoon, K. H. & Warhaft, Z. 1990 The evolution of grid-generated turbulence under conditions of stable thermal stratification. J. Fluid Mech. 215, 601–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar