Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T15:15:30.179Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A model for the propagation of inertial gravity currents released from a two-layer stratified lock

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2020

T. Zemach
Affiliation:
Department of Computer Science, Tel-Hai College, Tel-Hai1220800, Israel
M. Ungarish*
Affiliation:
Department of Computer Science, Technion, Haifa32000, Israel
*
Email address for correspondence: unga@cs.technion.ac.il

Abstract

Consider the propagation of a gravity current (GC) released from a lock of length $x_0$ and height $h_0$ into an ambient fluid of height $H h_0$ and density $\rho _{o}$. The lock contains a layer of thickness $H_L h_0$ of density $\rho _L$ overlaid by a layer of thickness $(1-H_L)h_0$ and density $\rho _U$, where $\rho _{o} < \rho _U < \rho _L$ and $H_L \in (0, 1)$. Assume Boussinesq and large Reynolds-number flow. The internal stratification parameter is $\sigma = (\rho _L - \rho _U)/(\rho _L - \rho _{o})$, in the range $(0,1)$; the classical GC is $\sigma =0$. Such GCs were investigated experimentally (Gladstone et al., Sedimentology, vol. 51, 2004, pp. 767–789; Dai, Phys. Rev. Fluids, vol. 2, 2017, 073802; Wu & Dai, J. Hydraul. Res., 2019, pp. 1–14.); we present a new self-contained model for the prediction of the thickness $h$ and depth-averaged velocity $u$ as functions of distance $x$ and time $t$; the position and speed of the nose $x_N(t)$ and $u_N(t)$ follow. We derive a compact scaling upon which, for a given $H$ (height ratio of ambient to lock), the flows differ in only one parameter: $\varPsi = \{ [1 -\sigma (1 - H_L)]/[1 - \sigma (1 - H_L^2)] \} ^{1/2}$. The parameter $\varPsi$ equals $1$ for the classical GC and is larger in the presence of stratification; a larger $\varPsi$ means a faster and a thinner GC. The solution reveals an initial slumping phase with constant $u_N$, a self-similar phase $x_N \sim t^{2/3}$, and the transition at $x_V$ to the viscous regime. Comparisons with published experiments show good data collapse with the present scaling $\varPsi$, and fair-to-good quantitative agreement (the discrepancy and the stability conditions are discussed).

Type
JFM Rapids
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Dai, A. 2017 Experiments on two-layer density-stratified inertial gravity currents. Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 073802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gladstone, C., Ritchie, R. S., Sparks, R. S. J. & Woods, A. W. 2004 An experimental investigation of density-stratified inertial gravity currents. Sedimentology 51, 767789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huppert, H. E. 2006 Gravity currents: a personal perspective. J. Fluid Mech. 554, 299322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huppert, H. E. & Simpson, J. E. 1980 The slumping of gravity currents. J. Fluid Mech. 99, 785799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, J. E. 1997 Gravity Currents in the Environment and Laboratory. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ungarish, M. 2009 An Introduction to Gravity Currents and Intrusions. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ungarish, M. & Huppert, H. E. 2002 On gravity currents propagating at the base of a stratified ambient. J. Fluid Mech. 458, 283301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, C.-S. & Dai, A. 2019 Experiments on two-layer stratified gravity currents in the slumping phase. J. Hydraul. Res. doi:10.1080/00221686.2019.1671517.Google Scholar