Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T16:02:50.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Leakage from gravity currents in a porous medium. Part 1. A localized sink

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2011

JEROME A. NEUFELD ,
DOMINIC VELLA ,
HERBERT E. HUPPERT  and
JOHN R. LISTER
JEROME A. NEUFELD*
Affiliation:
Institute of Theoretical Geophysics, Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, CMS, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK
DOMINIC VELLA
Affiliation:
Institute of Theoretical Geophysics, Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, CMS, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK
HERBERT E. HUPPERT
Affiliation:
Institute of Theoretical Geophysics, Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, CMS, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK
JOHN R. LISTER
Affiliation:
Institute of Theoretical Geophysics, Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, CMS, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK
*
†Email address for correspondence: j.neufeld@damtp.cam.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We consider the buoyancy-driven flow of a fluid injected into a semi-infinite porous medium bounded by a horizontal impermeable barrier through which a single localized sink allows leakage of the injected fluid. Our study is motivated by the geological sequestration of carbon dioxide (CO2), which is less dense than the ambient water, and the possibility that fissures in the bounding ‘cap’ rock may therefore compromise the long-term storage of CO2. A theoretical model is presented in which the leakage through the sink, or fissure, is driven by the hydrostatic pressure at the sink of the injected buoyant fluid. We determine numerical solutions for the evolution of the gravity current in the porous medium and for the quantity of fluid that escapes through the sink as a function of time. A quantity of considerable interest is the efficiency of storage, which we define as the flux of fluid that is stably stored relative to the amount injected. At the later stages in the evolution of the current, the region near the source and sink reaches a quasi-steady state. We find analytical solutions to this asymptotic state which show that the efficiency of storage decreases to zero like 1/lnt, where t is the time since initiation of the current, and predict a dependence on the properties of the sink in agreement with our numerical results. The implications of this result for the geological sequestration of CO2 are discussed.

JFM classification

Geophysical and Geological Flows: Gravity currents Low-Reynolds-number flows: Porous media
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 666 , 10 January 2011 , pp. 391 - 413
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Acton, J. M., Huppert, H. E. & Worster, M. G. 2001 Two-dimensional viscous gravity currents flowing over a deep porous medium. J. Fluid Mech. 440, 359–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, D. M., McLaughlin, R. M. & Miller, C. T. 2003 The averaging of gravity currents in porous media. Phys. Fluids 15 (10), 2810–2829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avci, C. B. 1994 Evaluation of flow leakage through abandoned wells and boreholes. Wat. Resour. Res. 30 (9), 2565–2578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barenblatt, G. I. 1996 Scaling, Self-Similarity, and Intermediate Asymptotics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bear, J. 1972 Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media. Dover.Google Scholar
Bickle, M., Chadwick, A., Huppert, H. E., Hallworth, M. & Lyle, S. 2007 Modelling carbon dioxide accumulation at Sleipner: implications for underground carbon storage. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 255, 164–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleaney, B. I. & Bleaney, B. 1976 Electricity and Magnetism, 3rd edn., vol. 1. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bolster, D., Dentz, M. & Carrera, J. 2009 Effective two-phase flow in heterogeneous media under temporal pressure fluctuations. Water Resour. Res. 45, W05408, doi:10.1029/2008WR007460, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, L. Y., Goldenfeld, N. & Oono, Y. 1991 Renormalization-group theory for the modified porous-medium equation. J. Fluid Mech. 44, 6544–6550.Google ScholarPubMed
Farcas, A. & Woods, A. W. 2009 The effect of drainage on the capillary retention of CO2 in a layered permeable rock. J. Fluid Mech. 618, 349–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesse, M. A., Tchelepi, H. A., Cantwell, B. J. & Orr, F. M. Jr. 2007 Gravity currents in horizontal porous layers: transition from early to late self-similarity. J. Fluid Mech. 577, 363–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huppert, H. E. 2006 Gravity currents: a personal perspective. J. Fluid Mech. 554, 299–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huppert, H. E. & Woods, A. W. 1995 Gravity-driven flows in porous layers. J. Fluid Mech. 292, 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, L. 1989 Enhanced Oil Recovery. Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Lyle, S., Huppert, H. E., Hallworth, M., Bickle, M. & Chadwick, A. 2005 Axisymmetric gravity currents in a porous medium. J. Fluid Mech. 543, 293–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neufeld, J. A. & Huppert, H. E. 2009 Modelling carbon dioxide sequestration in layered strata. J. Fluid Mech. 625, 353–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neufeld, J. A., Vella, D. & Huppert, H. E. 2009 The effect of a fissure on storage in a porous medium. J. Fluid Mech. 639, 239–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordbotten, J. M. & Celia, M. A. 2006 Similarity solutions for fluid injection into confined aquifers. J. Fluid Mech. 561, 307–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordbotten, J. M., Celia, M. A. & Bachu, S. 2004 Analytical solutions for leakage rates through abandoned wells. Wat. Resour. Res. 40 (4), W04204, doi:10.1029/2003WR00297, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordbotten, J. M., Celia, M. A., Bachu, S. & Dahle, H. 2005 Semianalytical solution for CO2 leakage through an abandoned well. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39, 602–611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nordbotten, J. M., Kavetski, D., Celia, M. A. & Bachu, S. 2009 Model for CO2 leakage including multiple geological layers and multiple leaky wells. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 743–749.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orr, F. M. Jr. 2009 Onshore geological storage of CO2. Science 325, 1656–1658.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pacala, S. & Socolow, R. 2004 Stabilization wedges: solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technology. Science 305, 968–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, O. M. 2009 Geological Fluid Dynamics: Sub-Surface Flow and Reactions. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T. & Flannery, B. P. 1997 Numerical Recipes in Fortran 77: The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. 2007 Gravity currents over fractured substrates in a porous medium. J. Fluid Mech. 584, 415–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, D. & Hogg, A. J. 2002 Draining viscous gravity currents in a vertical fracture. J. Fluid Mech. 459, 207–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, D., Woods, A. W. & Hogg, A. J. 2001 On the slow draining of a gravity current moving through a layered permeable medium. J. Fluid Mech. 444, 23–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spannuth, M. J., Neufeld, J. A., Wettlaufer, J. S. & Worster, M. G. 2009 Axisymmetric viscous gravity currents flowing over a porous medium. J. Fluid Mech. 622, 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vella, D. & Huppert, H. E. 2006 Gravity currents in a porous medium at an inclined plane. J. Fluid Mech. 555, 353–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vella, D, Neufeld, J. A., Huppert, H. E. & Lister, J. R. 2010 Leakage from gravity currents in a porous medium. Part 2. A line sink. J. Fluid Mech. doi:10.1017/S002211201000491X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, A. W. & Farcas, A. 2009 Capillary entry pressure and the leakage of gravity currents through a sloping layered permeable rock. J. Fluid Mech. 618, 361–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar