Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T05:03:32.068Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

High-resolution simulations of cylindrical density currents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2007

MARIANO I. CANTERO ,
S. BALACHANDAR  and
MARCELO H. GARCIA
MARIANO I. CANTERO*
Affiliation:
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
S. BALACHANDAR
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
MARCELO H. GARCIA
Affiliation:
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
*
†Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Three-dimensional highly resolved simulations are presented for cylindrical density currents using the Boussinesq approximation for small density difference. Three Reynolds numbers (Re) are investigated (895, 3450 and 8950, which correspond to values of the Grashof number of 105, 1.5 × 106 and 107, respectively) in order to identify differences in the flow structure and dynamics. The simulations are performed using a fully de-aliased pseudospectral code that captures the complete range of time and length scales of the flow. The simulated flows present the main features observed in experiments at large Re. As the current develops, it transitions through different phases of spreading, namely acceleration, slumping, inertial and viscous Soon after release the interface between light and heavy fluids rolls up forming Kelvin–Helmholtz vortices. The formation of the first vortex sets the transition between acceleration and slumping phases. Vortex formation continues only during the slumping phase and the formation of the last Kelvin–Helmholtz vortex signals the departure from the slumping phase. The coherent Kelvin–Helmholtz vortices undergo azimuthal instabilities and eventually break up into small-scale turbulence. In the case of planar currents this turbulent region extends over the entire body of the current, while in the cylindrical case it only extends to the regions of Kelvin–Helmholtz vortex breakup. The flow develops three-dimensionality right from the beginning with incipient lobes and clefts forming at the lower frontal region. These instabilities grow in size and extend to the upper part of the front. Lobes and clefts continuously merge and split and result in a complex pattern that evolves very dynamically. The wavelength of the lobes grows as the flow spreads, while the local Re of the flow decreases. However, the number of lobes is maintained over time. Owing to the high resolution of the simulations, we have been able to link the lobe and cleft structure to local flow patterns and vortical structures. In the near-front region and body of the current several hairpin vortices populate the flow. Laboratory experiments have been performed at the higher Re and compared to the simulation results showing good agreement. Movies are available with the online version of the paper.

JFM classification

Geophysical and Geological Flows: Gravity currents Vortex Flows: Vortex breakdown
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 590 , 10 November 2007 , pp. 437 - 469
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alahyari, A. & Longmire, E. 1996 Development and structure of a gravity current head. Exps. Fluids 20, 410–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, J. 1971 Mixing at turbidity current heads, and its geological implications. J. Sediment. Petrol. 41, 97–113.Google Scholar
Allen, J. 1985 Principles of Physical Sedimentology. George Allen and Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
Bonnecaze, R., Hallworth, M., Huppert, H. & Lister, J. 1995 Axisymmetric particle-driven gravity currents. J. Fluid Mech. 294, 93–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantero, M., Balachandar, S., García, M. & Ferry, J. 2006 Direct numerical simulations of planar and cyindrical density currents. Trans. ASME: J. Appl. Mech. 73, 923–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantero, M., Lee, J. R., Balachandar, S. & García, M. 2007 On the front velocity of gravity currents. J. Fluid Mech. 586, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakraborty, P., Balachandar, S. & Adrian, R. 2005 On the relationships between local vortex identification schemes. J. Fluid Mech. 535, 189–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fannelop, T. & Waldman, G. 1971 The dynamics of oil slicks – or ‘creeping crude. AIAAJ 41, 1–10.Google Scholar
Fay, J. 1969 The spreads of oil slicks on a calm sea. In Oils in the Sea (ed. Hoult, D. P.), pp. 53–63. Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García, M. & Parsons, J. 1996 Mixing at the front of gravity currents. Dyn. Atmosp. Oceans 24, 197–205.Google Scholar
Hallworth, M., Huppert, H., Phillips, J. & Sparks, R. 1996 Entrainment into two-dimensional and axisymmetric turbulent gravity currents. J. Fluid Mech. 308, 289–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallworth, M., Huppert, H. & Ungarish, M. 2001 Axisymmetric gravity currents in a rotating system: experimental and numerical investigations. J. Fluid Mech. 447, 1–29.Google Scholar
Härtel, C., Carlsson, F. & Thunblom, M. 2000 a Analysis and direct numerical simulation of the flow at a gravity-current head. Part 2. The lobe-and-cleft instability. J. Fluid Mech. 418, 213–229.Google Scholar
Härtel, C., Meiburg, E. & Necker, F. 2000 b Analysis and direct numerical simulation of the flow at a gravity-current head. Part 1. Flow topology and front speed for slip and no-slip boundaries. J. Fluid Mech. 418, 189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoult, D. 1972 Oil spreading in the sea. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 4, 341–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huppert, H. 1982 The propagation of two-dimensional and axisymmetric viscous gravity currents over a rigid horizontal surface. J. Fluid Mech. 121, 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huppert, H. & Simpson, J. 1980 The slumping of gravity currents. J. Fluid Mech. 99, 785–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, B. & Wilhelmson, R. 1997 a The numerical simulation of non-supercell tornadogenesis. Part I: Initiation and evolution of pretornadic misocyclone circulation along a dry outflow boundary. J. Atmos. Sci. 54, 32–60.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, B. & Wilhelmson, R. 1997 b The numerical simulation of non-supercell tornadogenesis. Part II: Evolution of a family of tornadoes along a weak outflow boundary. J. Atmos. Sci. 54, 2387–2415.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marino, B., Thomas, L. & Linden, P. 2005 The front condition for gravity currents. J. Fluid Mech. 536, 49–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. & Moyce, W. 1952 Part V. An experimental study of the collapse of fluid columns on a rigid horizontal bottom, in a medium of lower, but comparable, density. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 244, 325–334.Google Scholar
Necker, F., Härtel, C., Kleiser, L. & Meiburg, E. 2002 High-resolution simulations of particle-driven gravity currents. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 28, 279–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özgökmen, T., Fischer, P., Duan, J. & Iliescu, T. 2004 Three-dimensional turbulent bottom density currents from a high-order nonhydrostatic spectral element model. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 34, 2006–2026.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, J. & García, M. 1998 Similarity of gravity current fronts. Phys. Fluids 10, 3209–3213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, M., Simpson, J., Dalziel, S. & van Heijst, G. 2006 Vortical motion in the head of an axisymmetric gravity current. Phys. Fluids 18 (4), 046601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rottman, J. & Simpson, J. 1983 Gravity currents produced by instantaneous releases of a heavy fluid in a rectangular channel. J. Fluid Mech. 135, 95–110.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. 1972 Effects of the lower boundary on the head of a gravity current. J. Fluid Mech. 53 (4), 759–768.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. 1997 Gravity Currents, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. & Britter, R. 1979 The dynamics of the head of a gravity current advancing over a horizontal surface. J. Fliud Mech. 94, 477–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ungarish, M. 2007 Axisymmetric gravity currents at high reynolds numbers: On the quality of shallow-water modeling of experimental observations. Phys. Fluids 19, 036602.Google Scholar
Ungarish, M. & Zemach, T. 2005 On the slumping of high reynolds number gravity currents in two-dimensional and axisymmetric configurations. Eur. J. Mech. B/Fluids 24, 71–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, J., Ma, H. & Zhou, M. 2006 Vorticity and Vortex Dynamics. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, J., Adrian, R., Balachandar, S. & Kendall, T. 1999 Mech. for generating coherent packets of hairpin vortices. J. Fluid Mech. 387, 353–396.Google Scholar

Cantero et al. supplementary movie

Movie 1. This movie shows a density current that develops from the collapse of a cylinder of heavy fluid in a lighter environment. The flow is computed by direct numerical simulation in a square domain with dimensions 15Hx15HxH and with grid resolution of 880x880x180. The Reynolds number of the flow is Re=8950. Initially the flow evolves nearly axisymmetrically, in which Kelvin-Helmholtz rings develop and form along the front and body of the current. As a consequence of the no-slip condition at the bottom, the current presents a lifted nose and a layer of light fluid penetrates below the front, producing a region of unstable stratification. Incipient lobes and clefts start to form at the leading edge soon after the collapse and evolve into a mature pattern that shows several mergers and splitings of lobes. As the front advances, the Kelvin-Helmholtz rings destabilize and eventually decay into smaller scale turbulence (see also movie 3). This complex dynamics of the vortex rings is controlled by a delicate balance between baroclinic production, stretching, tilting, transport and dissipation. This movie was produced by David Bock at the National Center for Supercomputing Applications at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign by volumetric rendering of the density field.

Download Cantero et al. supplementary movie(Video)
Video 2.2 MB

Cantero et al. supplementary movie

Movie 1. This movie shows a density current that develops from the collapse of a cylinder of heavy fluid in a lighter environment. The flow is computed by direct numerical simulation in a square domain with dimensions 15Hx15HxH and with grid resolution of 880x880x180. The Reynolds number of the flow is Re=8950. Initially the flow evolves nearly axisymmetrically, in which Kelvin-Helmholtz rings develop and form along the front and body of the current. As a consequence of the no-slip condition at the bottom, the current presents a lifted nose and a layer of light fluid penetrates below the front, producing a region of unstable stratification. Incipient lobes and clefts start to form at the leading edge soon after the collapse and evolve into a mature pattern that shows several mergers and splitings of lobes. As the front advances, the Kelvin-Helmholtz rings destabilize and eventually decay into smaller scale turbulence (see also movie 3). This complex dynamics of the vortex rings is controlled by a delicate balance between baroclinic production, stretching, tilting, transport and dissipation. This movie was produced by David Bock at the National Center for Supercomputing Applications at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign by volumetric rendering of the density field.

Download Cantero et al. supplementary movie(Video)
Video 2.9 MB

Cantero et al. supplementary movie

Movie 2. Visualization of the circumferentially averaged density field for the same flow as presented in movie 1. This visualization shows clearly the formation and trajectories of the anticlockwise-rotating Kelvin-Helmholtz rings and clockwise-rotating rings that form close to the bottom wall. The formation of all vortex rings occurs during the initial slumping phase and no new vortices are formed during the subsequent self-similar inertial and viscous phases. The formation of the clockwise-rotating rings occurs owing to local boundary layer separation by local adverse pressure gradients induced by the anticlockwise-rotating rings.

Download Cantero et al. supplementary movie(Video)
Video 842.8 KB

Cantero et al. supplementary movie

Movie 2. Visualization of the circumferentially averaged density field for the same flow as presented in movie 1. This visualization shows clearly the formation and trajectories of the anticlockwise-rotating Kelvin-Helmholtz rings and clockwise-rotating rings that form close to the bottom wall. The formation of all vortex rings occurs during the initial slumping phase and no new vortices are formed during the subsequent self-similar inertial and viscous phases. The formation of the clockwise-rotating rings occurs owing to local boundary layer separation by local adverse pressure gradients induced by the anticlockwise-rotating rings.

Download Cantero et al. supplementary movie(Video)
Video 908.7 KB

Cantero et al. supplementary movie

Movie 3. Volumetric rendering of the swirling strength field for the same flow as presented in movie 1. The swirling strength provides a clean measure of the compact vortical structures of the flow. The formation of anticlockwise-rotating vortices A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, and clockwise-rotating vortices C1, C2 and C3 mentioned in the paper is clearly captured in the visualization. Observe the complex vortex dynamics showing stretching, tilting, bending, pairing and eventual break-up of the rings. This movie was produced by David Bock at the National Center for Supercomputing Applications at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Download Cantero et al. supplementary movie(Video)
Video 4.1 MB

Cantero et al. supplementary movie

Movie 3. Volumetric rendering of the swirling strength field for the same flow as presented in movie 1. The swirling strength provides a clean measure of the compact vortical structures of the flow. The formation of anticlockwise-rotating vortices A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, and clockwise-rotating vortices C1, C2 and C3 mentioned in the paper is clearly captured in the visualization. Observe the complex vortex dynamics showing stretching, tilting, bending, pairing and eventual break-up of the rings. This movie was produced by David Bock at the National Center for Supercomputing Applications at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Download Cantero et al. supplementary movie(Video)
Video 5.2 MB