Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T06:10:17.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gravity currents from a line source in an ambient flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2008

ANJA C. SLIM  and
HERBERT E. HUPPERT
ANJA C. SLIM
Affiliation:
Institute of Theoretical Geophysics, Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, University of Cambridge, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK
HERBERT E. HUPPERT
Affiliation:
Institute of Theoretical Geophysics, Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, University of Cambridge, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We present a mainly theoretical study of high-Reynolds-number planar gravity currents in a uniformly flowing deep ambient. The gravity currents are generated by a constant line source of fluid, and may also be supplied with a source of horizontal momentum and a source of particles. We model the motion using a shallow-water approximation and represent the effects of the ambient flow by imposing a Froude-number condition in a moving frame. We present analytic and numerical expressions for the threshold ambient flow speed above which no upstream propagation can occur at long times. For homogeneous gravity currents in an ambient flow below threshold, we find similarity solutions in which the up- and downstream fronts spread at a constant rate and the current propagates indefinitely in both directions. For gravity currents consisting of both interstitial fluid of a different density to the ambient and a sedimenting particle load, we find long-time asymptotic solutions for ambient flow strengths below threshold. These consist of a steady particle-rich near-source region, in which settling and advection of particles balance, and an effectively particle-free frontal region. The homogeneous behaviour of the fronts ensures that they also spread at a constant rate and therefore can propagate upstream indefinitely. For gravity currents driven solely by a sedimenting particle load, we find numerically that a single regime exists for ambient flow strengths below threshold. In these solutions, settling balances advection near the source leading to a steady region, which joins on to a complex frontal boundary layer. The upstream front progressively decelerates. Our solutions for homogeneous and particle-driven gravity currents compare well with published experimental results.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 606 , 10 July 2008 , pp. 1 - 26
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Benjamin, T. B. 1968 Gravity currents and related phenomena. J. Fluid Mech. 31, 209–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnecaze, R. T., Hallworth, M. A., Huppert, H. E. & Lister, J. R. 1995 Axisymmetric particle-driven gravity currents. J. Fluid Mech. 294, 93–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnecaze, R. T., Huppert, H. E. & Lister, J. R. 1993 Particle-driven gravity currents. J. Fluid Mech. 250, 339–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carbone, R. E. 1982 A severe frontal rainband. Part I: stormwide hydrodynamic structure. J. Atmos. Sci. 39, 258–279.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cederwall, K. 1971 Buoyant slot jets into stagnant or flowing environments. Tech. Rep. KH-R-25. W. M. Keck Lab. of Hydraulics and Water Resources, California Inst. Tech.Google Scholar
Ellison, T. H. & Turner, J. S. 1959 Turbulent entrainment in stratified flows. J. Fluid Mech. 6, 423–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fannelop, T. K. & Waldman, G. D. 1972 Dynamics of oil slicks. AIAA J. 10, 506–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gratton, J. & Vigo, C. 1994 Self-similar gravity currents with variable inflow revisited: plane currents. J. Fluid Mech. 258, 77–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gröbelbauer, H. P., Fanneløp, T. K. & Britter, R. E. 1993 The propagation of intrusion fronts of high-density ratios. J. Fluid Mech. 250, 669–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, J., Linden, P. F. & Dalziel, S. B. 1996 Mixing in lock-release gravity currents. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans 24, 183–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallworth, M. A., Hogg, A. J. & Huppert, H. E. 1998 Effects of external flow on compositional and particle gravity currents. J. Fluid Mech. 359, 109–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallworth, M. A., Huppert, H. E., Phillips, J. C. & Sparks, R. S. J. 1996 Entrainment into two-dimensional and axisymmetric turbulent gravity currents. J. Fluid Mech. 308, 289–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, T. C., Hogg, A. J. & Huppert, H. E. 2001 A mathematical framework for the analysis of particle-driven gravity currents. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 457, 1241–1272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, A. J., Hallworth, M. A. & Huppert, H. E. 2005 On gravity currents driven by constant fluxes of saline and particle-laden fluid in the presence of a uniform flow. J. Fluid Mech. 539, 349–385 (referred to herein as HHH).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, A. J. & Woods, A. W. 2001 The transition from inertia- to bottom-drag-dominated motion of turbulent gravity currents. J. Fluid Mech. 449, 201–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoult, D. P. 1972 Oil spreading on the sea. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 4, 341–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoult, D. P., Fay, J. A. & Forney, L. J. 1969 A theory of plume rise compared with field observations. J. Air Poll. Contr. Assoc. 19 (8), 585–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huppert, H. E. 1982 The propagation of two-dimensional and axisymmetric viscous gravity currents over a rigid horizontal surface. J. Fluid Mech. 121, 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Kármán, T. 1940 The engineer grapples with nonlinear problems. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 46, 615–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kevorkian, J. 1991 Partial Differential Equations: Analytical Solution Techniques. Springer.Google Scholar
Klemp, J. B., Rotunno, R. & Skamarock, W. C. 1994 On the dynamics of gravity currents in a channel. J. Fluid Mech. 269, 169–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lax, P. D. 1957 Hyperbolic systems of conservation laws II. Commun. Pure Appl. Maths X, 537–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeVeque, R. J. 2002 Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeVeque, R. J. & Shyue, K.-M. 1996 Two-dimensional front tracking based on high resolution wave propagation methods. J. Comput. Phys. 123, 354–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, C. H. & Moncrieff, M. W. 1996 A numerical study of the effects of ambient flow and shear on density currents. Mon. Weath. Rev. 124, 2282–2303.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. C. & Bernoff, A. J. 2003 Rates of convergence to self-similar solutions of Burgers' equation. Stud. Appl. Maths 111, 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedlosky, J. 1987 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, 2nd edn.Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, A. N. 2000 Gravity currents on slopes. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rottman, J. W. & Simpson, J. E. 1983 Gravity currents produced by instantaneous release of a heavy fluid in a rectangular channel. J. Fluid Mech. 135, 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, J. E. 1997 Gravity Currents: In the Environment and the Laboratory, 2nd edn.Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. E. & Britter, R. E. 1980 A laboratory model of an atmospheric mesofront. Q. J. R. Met. Soc. 106, 485–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slim, A. C. 2006 High Reynolds number gravity currents. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thorpe, A. J., Miller, M. J. & Moncrieff, M. W. 1980 Dynamical models of two-dimensional downdraughts. Q.J.R. Met. Soc. 106, 463–484.Google Scholar
Toro, E. F. 1992 Riemann problems and the WAF method for solving the two-dimensional shallow-water equations. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 338, 43–68.Google Scholar
Toro, E. F. 2001 Shock-capturing Methods for Free-surface Shallow Flows. Wiley.Google Scholar
Ungarish, M. 2007 A shallow-water model for high-Reynolds-number gravity currents for a wide range of density differences and fractional depths. J. Fluid Mech. 579, 373–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ungarish, M. & Huppert, H. E. 1998 The effects of rotation on axisymmetric gravity currents. J. Fluid Mech. 362, 17–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentine, D. T. & Kao, T. W. 1984 Gravity current upstream of a buoyant influx in an open-channel flow – a numerical study. J. Fluid Mech. 140, 303–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitham, G. B. 1974 Linear and Nonlinear Waves. Wiley.Google Scholar