Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-28T17:57:07.403Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experimental investigation of opposed jets discharging normally into a cross-stream

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2006

K. N. Atkinson
Affiliation:
Imperial College of Science and Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Fluids Section, London SW7 2BX
Z. A. Khan
Affiliation:
Imperial College of Science and Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Fluids Section, London SW7 2BX
J. H. Whitelaw
Affiliation:
Imperial College of Science and Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Fluids Section, London SW7 2BX

Abstract

Detailed measurements are reported of mean-flow and turbulence characteristics of opposed jets discharging normally into a cross-flowing stream. They were obtained with pitch-to-diameter ratios of two and four, and for the limiting case of single opposed jets and for a separation of four jet diameters. Results are presented at downstream distances from two diameters from the plane of the jet centres.

The results for the symmetrically arranged jets show that the jets retain their identity for a velocity ratio of unity and pitch-to-diameter ratios of four and infinity. With a velocity ratio of 1·8, the single opposed jets bifurcate about a vertical plane to form two symmetric cores of mixed jet fluid. With the pitch-to-diameter ratio of two, the individual jets retain their identity and, in contrast with the results for a pitch-to-diameter ratio of four, where each jet divides to form two cores, only one core is formed for each jet. In general, the turbulence characteristics are determined by the mean flow, which is controlled largely by pressure forces.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1982 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Champagne, F. H. & Sleicher, C. A. 1967 Turbulence measurements with inclined hot-wires. Part 2. Hot-wire response equations. J. Fluid Mech. 28, 177.Google Scholar
Crabb, D. 1979 Jets in crossflow. Ph.D. thesis, University of London.
Crabb, D., Durão, D. F. G. & Whitelaw, J. H. 1981 A round jet normal to a crossflow. Trans. A.S.M.E. I, J. Fluids Engng 103, 142.Google Scholar
Holdeman, J. D., Walker, R. E. & Kors, D. L. 1973 Mixing of multiple dilution jets with a hot primary airstream for gas turbine combustors. N.A.S.A. TMX-71426.Google Scholar
Jones, W. P. & McGuirk, J. J. 1980 Computations of a round turbulent jet discharging into a confined crossflow. In Turbulent Shear Flows 2, p. 233. Springer.
Kamotani, Y. & Greber, I. 1973 Experiments on confined turbulent jets in a crossflow. Proc. A.I.A.A. 6th Fluid and Plasma Dyn. Conf. Palm Springs, California. A.I.A.A. Paper no. 73–647.Google Scholar
Kamotani, Y. & Greber, I. 1974 Experiments on confined turbulent jets in a crossflow. N.A.S.A. Contractor Rep. N.A.S.A. CR-2392.Google Scholar
Khan, Z. A. & Whitelaw, J. H. 1980 Vector and scalar characteristics of opposing jets discharging normally into a cross-stream. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 23, 1673.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, M. M. & Whitelaw, J. H. 1975 Statistical characteristics of a turbulent jet. J. Fluid Mech. 70, 1.Google Scholar
Walker, R. E. & Kors, D. L. 1973 Multiple jet study — Final report. N.A.S.A. CR-121217.Google Scholar