Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T14:42:57.834Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The evolution of miscible gravity currents in horizontal porous layers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2013

M. L. Szulczewski  and
R. Juanes
M. L. Szulczewski
Affiliation:
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
R. Juanes*
Affiliation:
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: juanes@mit.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Gravity currents of miscible fluids in porous media are important to understand because they occur in important engineering projects, such as enhanced oil recovery and geologic CO2 sequestration. These flows are often modelled based on two simplifying assumptions: vertical velocities are negligible compared with horizontal velocities, and diffusion is negligible compared with advection. In many cases, however, these assumptions limit the validity of the models to a finite, intermediate time interval during the flow, making prediction of the flow at early and late times difficult. Here, we consider the effects of vertical flow and diffusion to develop a set of models for the entire evolution of a miscible gravity current. To gain physical insight, we study a simple system: lock exchange of equal-viscosity fluids in a horizontal, vertically confined layer of permeable rock. We show that the flow exhibits five regimes: (i) an early diffusion regime, in which the fluids diffuse across the initially sharp fluid–fluid interface; (ii) an S-slumping regime, in which the fluid–fluid interface tilts in an S-shape; (iii) a straight-line slumping regime, in which the fluid–fluid interface tilts as a straight line; (iv) a Taylor-slumping regime, in which Taylor dispersion at the aquifer scale enhances mixing between the fluids and causes the flow to continuously decelerate; and (v) a late diffusion regime, in which the flow becomes so slow that mass transfer again occurs dominantly though diffusion.

JFM classification

Geophysical and Geological Flows: Gravity currents Low-Reynolds-number flows: Porous media
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 719 , 25 March 2013 , pp. 82 - 96
Copyright
©2013 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ascher, U. M., Ruuth, S. J. & Spiteri, R. J. 1997 Implicit–explicit Runge–Kutta methods for time-dependent partial differential equations. Appl. Numer. Maths 25, 151–167.Google Scholar
Barenblatt, G. I. 1952 On some unsteady motions of fluids and gases in a porous medium. Prikl. Mat. Mekh. 16, 67–78, English translation in Appl. Math. Mech.Google Scholar
Barenblatt, G. I. 1996 Scaling, Self-Similarity, and Intermediate Asymptotics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bear, J. 1972 Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media. Elsevier, reprinted with corrections, Dover, 1988.Google Scholar
Crank, J. 1980 The Mathematics of Diffusion. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De Josselin De Jong, G. 1981 The simultaneous flow of fresh and salt water in aquifers of large horizontal extension determined by shear flow and vortex theory. Proc. Euromech. 143, 75–82.Google Scholar
Dentz, M., Tartakovsky, D. M., Abarca, E., Guadagnini, A., Sanchez-vila, X. & Carrera, J. 2006 Variable-density flow in porous media. J. Fluid Mech. 561, 209–235.Google Scholar
Dussan, V. & Auzerais, E. B. 1993 Buoyancy-induced flow in porous media generated near a drilled oil well. Part 1. The accumulation of filtrate at a horizontal impermeable boundary. J. Fluid Mech. 254, 283–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ennis-King, J. & Paterson, L. 2005 Role of convective mixing in the long-term storage of carbon dioxide in deep saline formations. SPE J. 10 (3), 349–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdogan, M. E. & Chatwin, P. C. 1967 The effects of curvature and buoyancy on the laminar dispersion of solute in a horizontal tube. J. Fluid Mech. 29 (3), 465–484.Google Scholar
Henry, H. R. 1964 Effects of dispersion on salt encroachment in coastal aquifers. Tech. Rep. 1613-C. USGS.Google Scholar
Hesse, M. A., Tchelepi, H. A., Cantwell, B. J. & Orr, F. M. 2007 Gravity currents in horizontal porous layers: transition from early to late self-similarity. J. Fluid Mech. 577, 363–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huppert, H. E. & Woods, A. W. 1995 Gravity-driven flows in porous layers. J. Fluid Mech. 292, 55–69.Google Scholar
Lake, L. 1989 Enhanced Oil Recovery. Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Lambert, J. D. 1991 Numerical Methods for Ordinary Differential Systems: The Initial Value Problem. Wiley.Google Scholar
Landman, A. J. & Schotting, R. J. 2007 Heat and brine transport in porous media: the Oberbeck–Boussinesq approximation revisited. Transp. Porous Med. 70, 355–373.Google Scholar
LeVeque, R. J. 2002 Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Loubens, R. & Ramakrishnan, T. S. 2011 Analysis and computation of gravity-induced migration in porous media. J. Fluid Mech. 675, 60–86.Google Scholar
Lyle, S., Huppert, H. E., Hallworth, M., Bickle, M. & Chadwick, A. 2005 Axisymmetric gravity currents in a porous medium. J. Fluid Mech. 543, 293–302.Google Scholar
MacMinn, C. W., Szulczewski, M. L. & Juanes, R. 2011 ${\mathrm{CO} }_{2} $ migration in saline aquifers. Part 2. Capillary and solubility trapping. J. Fluid. Mech. 688, 321–351.Google Scholar
Nguyen, N. 2011 Micromixers: Fundamentals, Design and Fabrication. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Nordbotten, J. M. & Celia, M. A. 2006 Similarity solutions for fluid injection into confined aquifers. J. Fluid Mech. 561, 307–327.Google Scholar
Paster, A. & Dagan, G. 2007 Mixing at the interface between two fluids in porous media: a boundary-layer solution. J. Fluid Mech. 584, 455–472.Google Scholar
Riaz, A., Hesse, M., Tchelepi, H. A. & Orr, F. M. Jr. 2006 Onset of convection in a gravitationally unstable, diffusive boundary layer in porous media. J. Fluid Mech. 548, 87–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. 1976 Longitudinal dispersion of a buoyant contaminant in a shallow channel. J. Fluid Mech. 78 (4), 677–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szulczewski, M. L., MacMinn, C. W., Herzog, H. J. & Juanes, R. 2012 Lifetime of carbon capture and storage as a climate-change mitigation technology. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109 (14), 5185–5189.Google Scholar
Tartakovsky, D. M., Guadagnini, A., Sanchez-Vila, X., Dentz, M. & Carrera, J. 2004 A perturbation solution to the transient Henry problem for sea water intrusion. In Developments in Water Science, vol. 55, pp. 1573–1581. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1953 Dispersion of soluble matter in solvent flowing slowly through a tube. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 219 (1137), 186–203.Google Scholar
Vella, D. & Huppert, H. E. 2006 Gravity currents in a porous medium at an inclined plane. J. Fluid Mech. 555, 353–362.Google Scholar
Yortsos, Y. C. 1995 A theoretical analysis of vertical flow equilibrium. Transp. Porous Med. 18 (2), 107–129.Google Scholar