Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T23:43:08.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of vortex pairing on particle dispersion and kinetic energy transfer in a two-phase turbulent shear layer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Kenneth T. Kiger
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mechanics and Engineering Sciences, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0411, USA
Juan C. Lasheras
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mechanics and Engineering Sciences, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0411, USA

Abstract

The transport of heavy, polydispersed particles and the inter-phase transfer of kinetic energy due to the viscous drag forces is measured experimentally in a turbulent shear layer. To study the effect of the large-scale vortex pairing event, the shear layer is forced simultaneously with a fundarmental and subharmonic perturbation. It is shown that vortex pairing plays a homogenizing role on the particulate field, but hte amount of homogenization is strongly dependent upon the particle's viscous relaxtion time, the eddy turnover time, as well as the time the particles interact with each scale prior to a pairing event. Thus, even though the smaller size particles become well-mixed across the large eddies, the larger sizes are still dispersed in an inhormogeneous fashion. It is also found that the kinetic energy transfer between the phases occurs inhomogeneously with energy being exchanged predominantly in a sublayer just outside the region of maximum turbulence intensity. The kinetic energy transfer is shown to exhibit notable positive and negative peaks located beneath the cores and stagnation points of the large-scale eddy field, and these peaks are shown to result from the irrotational velocity perturbations created by the vortices. This energy exchange mechanism remains a prominent process as long as the Stokes number of the particles relative to the vortices is of order unity.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1995 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bachalo, W. D. & Houser, M. J. 1983 Phase/Doppler spray analyzer for simultaneous measurements of drop size and velocity distributions. Opt. Engng. 23, 583590.Google Scholar
Brown, G. L. & Roshko, A. 1974 On density effects and large structure in turbulent mixing layers. J. Fluid Mech. 64, 775816.Google Scholar
Chein, R. C. & Chung, J. N. 1987 Effects of vortex pairing on particle dispersion in turbulent shear flows. Intl. J. Multiphase Flow 13, 785802.Google Scholar
Chein, R. C. & Chcng, I. N. 1988 Simulation of particle dispersion in a two-dimensional mixing layer. AICRhE J. 34, 946954.Google Scholar
Corcos, G. M. & Sherman, E. S. 1984 The mixing layer: deterministic models of a turbulent flow. Part I. Introduction and the two-decisional flow. J. Fluid Mech. 139, 2965.Google Scholar
Crowe, C. T., Chung, J. N. Troctt, T. R. 1988 Particle mixcing in face shear flows. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 14, 171194.Google Scholar
Drain, L. E. 1980 The Laser Doppler Technique. Wiley.
Elghobashi, S. E. & Abou-Arar, T. W. 1983 A two-equation turbulence model for two-phase flows. Phys. Fluids. 26, 931938Google Scholar
Hjelmfelt, A. T. & Mockros, L. F. 1966 Motion of discrete particles in a turbulent fluid. Appl. Sci. Res. 16, 149161.Google Scholar
Huang, L. S. & Ho, C. M. 1982 Subharmonics and vortex merging in mixing layers. J. Fluid Mech. 119, 443473.Google Scholar
Hussain, A. K. M. F. & Zedan, M. F. 1978 Effects of the initial condition on the anisymmetric free shear layer: Effects of the initial momentum thickness. Phys. Fluids 21, 11001212.Google Scholar
Kiger, K. T. 1995 Particle dispersion and inter-phase Kinetic energy transfer in a turbulent, two-phase shear layer. PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
Lasheras, J. C. & Tio, K. K. 1994 Dynamics of a small spherical particle in steady two-dimensional vortex flows. Appl. Mech. Rev. 47, 6 part 2. 61–69.Google Scholar
Lázaro, B. J. 1989 particle dispersion in turbulent free shear flows. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California.
Lázaro, B. J. & Lasheras, J. C. 1989 Particle dispersion in a turbulent, plane, free shear layer. Phys. Fluids A 1, 10351044.Google Scholar
Lázaro, B. J. & Lasheras, J. C. 1992 a Particle dispersion in a developing free shear layer. Part 1 Unforced flow. J. Fluid Mech. 235, 143178.Google Scholar
Lázaro, B. J. & Lasheras, J. C 1992 b Particle dispersion in a developing free shear layer. Part 2. Forced flow. J. Fluid Mech. 235, 179221.Google Scholar
Longmire, E. K. & Eaton, J. K. 1992 Structure of a particle-laden round jet. J. Fluid Mech. 236, 217257.Google Scholar
Martin, J. E. & Meiburg, E. 1994 The accumulation and dispersion of heavy particles in forced two-dimensional mixing layers. 1. The fundamental and subbarmonic cases. Phys. FluidsA 6, 11161132.Google Scholar
Aclaughlin, D. K. & Tiederman, W. G. 1973 Biasing correction for individual realization of lascr anctnometer measurements in turbulent flows. Phys. Fluids 16, 20822088.Google Scholar
Snakar, S. V. & Bachalo, W. D. 1991 Response characteristics of the phase Doppler particle analyzer for sizing spherical particles larger than the light wavelength. Opt. Engng 30, 14871476.Google Scholar
Williams, F. A. 1988 Combustion Theory 2nd edn. Addision-weslcy.
Winant, C. D. & Browabnd, F. K. 1973 Vortex pairing: the mechanism of turbulent mixing layer growth at moderate Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 63, 237255.Google Scholar
Yang, Z. & Karlsson, S. K. F. 1991 Evolution of coherent structures in a plane shear layer. Phys. fluidsA 3, 22072219.Google Scholar