Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:07:16.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dissimilar control of momentum and heat transfer in a fully developed turbulent channel flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2011

Y. Hasegawa  and
N. Kasagi
Y. Hasegawa*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Bunkyo-ku, Hongo, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan Center of Smart Interfaces, TU Darmstadt, Petersenstrasse 32, 64287, Darmstadt, Germany
N. Kasagi
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Bunkyo-ku, Hongo, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan
*
†Email address for correspondence: hasegawa@thtlab.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A wide range of applicability of the Reynolds analogy between turbulent momentum and heat transport implies inherent difficulty in diminishing or enhancing skin friction and heat transfer independently. In the present study, we introduce suboptimal control theory for achieving a dissimilar control of enhancing heat transfer, while keeping the skin friction not increased considerably in a fully developed channel flow. The Fréchet differentials clearly show that the responses of velocity and temperature fields to wall blowing/suction are quite different, due to the fact that the velocity is a divergence-free vector field while the temperature is a conservative scalar field. This essential difference allows us to achieve dissimilar control even in flows where the averaged momentum and energy transport equations have an identical form. It is also found that the resultant optimized mode of control input exhibits a streamwise travelling-wave-like property. By exploring the phase relationship between the travelling-wave-like control input and the velocity and thermal fields, we reveal that such control input contributes to dissimilar heat transfer enhancement via two different mechanisms, i.e. direct modification of the coherent components of the Reynolds shear stress and the turbulent heat flux, and indirect effects on the incoherent components, through modification of the mean velocity and temperature profiles. Based on these results, a simple open-loop strategy for dissimilar control is proposed and assessed.

JFM classification

Flow Control: Drag reduction Flow Control: Mixing enhancement Turbulent Flows: Turbulence control
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 683 , 25 September 2011 , pp. 57 - 93
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Antonia, R. A. & Krishnamoorthy, L. V. 1988 Correlation between the longitudinal velocity fluctuation and temperature fluctuation in the near-wall region of a turbulent boundary layer. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 31, 723–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Bewley, T. 2009 A fundamental limit on the balance of power in a transpiration-controlled channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 558, 309–318.Google Scholar
3. Bewley, T., Moin, P. & Temam, R. 2001 DNS-based predictive control of turbulence: an optimal benchmark for feedback algorithms. J. Fluid Mech. 447, 179–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Chilton, T. H. & Colburn, A. P. 1934 Mass-transfer coefficients, prediction from data on heat transfer and fluid friction. Ind. Engng Chem. 26, 1183–1187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Choi, H., Moin, P. & Kim, J. 1994 Active turbulence control for drag reduction in wall-bounded flows. J. Fluid Mech. 262, 75–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Fukagata, K., Iwamoto, K. & Kasagi, N. 2002 Contribution of Reynolds stress distribution to the skin friction in wall-bounded flows. Phys. Fluids 14, L73–L76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Fukagata, K. & Kasagi, N. 2004 Suboptimal control of drag reduction via suppression of near-wall Reynolds shear stress. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 25, 341–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Fukagata, K., Sugiyama, K. & Kasagi, N. 2009 On the lower bound of net driving power in controlled duct flows. Physica D 238, 1082–1086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Iwamoto, K., Suzuki, Y. & Kasagi, N. 2002 Reynolds number effect on wall turbulence: toward effective feedback control. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 23, 678–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Kasagi, N., Hasegawa, Y., Fukagata, K. & Iwamoto, K. 2011 Control of turbulent transport: less friction and more heat transfer. Trans. ASME J: J. Heat Transfer 111 (in press).Google Scholar
11. Kasagi, N., Kuroda, A. & Hirata, M. 1989 Numerical investigation of near-wall turbulent heat transfer taking into account the unsteady heat conduction in the solid wall. Trans. ASME J: J. Heat Transfer 111, 385–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Kasagi, N., Suzuki, Y. & Fukagata, K. 2009 Microelectromechanical systems-based feedback control of turbulence for skin friction reduction. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 41, 231–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Kasagi, N., Tomita, Y. & Kuroda, A. 1992 Direct numerical simulation of passive scalar field in a two dimensional turbulent channel flow. Trans. ASME J: J. Heat Transfer 114, 598–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Keys, W., Crawford, M. E. & Weigand, B. 2005 Convective Heat and Mass Transfer, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
15. Kong, H., Choi, H. & Lee, S. L. 2001 Dissimilarity between the velocity and temperature fields in a perturbed turbulent thermal boundary layer. Phys. Fluids 13, 1466–1479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Lee, C., Kim, J. & Choi, H. 1998 Suboptimal control of turbulent channel flow for drag reduction. J. Fluid Mech. 358, 245–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Lim, J. & Kim, J. 2004 A singular value analysis of boundary layer control. Phys. Fluids 16, 1980–1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Mamori, H., Fukagata, K. & Hoepffner, J. 2010 The phase relationship in laminar channel flow controlled by travelling-wave-like blowing or suction. Phys. Rev. E 81, 046304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Min, T., Kang, S. M., Speyer, J. L. & Kim, J. 2006 Sustained sub-laminar drag in a fully developed channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 558, 309–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Quadrio, M., Ricco, P. & Viotti, C. 2009 Streamwise-travelling waves of spanwise wall velocity for turbulent drag reduction. J. Fluid Mech. 627, 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Reynolds, O. 1874 On the extent and action of the heating surface of steam boilers. Proc. Lit. Phil. Soc. Manchester 14, 7–12.Google Scholar
22. Suzuki, H., Suzuki, K. & Sato, T. 1988 Dissimilarity between heat and momentum transfer in a turbulent boundary layer disturbed by a cylinder. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 31, 259–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Yokoo, M., Kasagi, N. & Suzuki, Y. 2000 Optimal control of heat transfer and skin friction in wall turbulence. In Proc. 3rd Intl Symp. Turbulence, Heat and Mass Transfer, pp. 949–956. Aichi Shuppan Co., Ltd.Google Scholar