Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T11:58:46.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Buoyancy-driven bubbly flows: role of meso-scale structures on the relative motion between phases in bubble columns operated in the heterogeneous regime

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2023

Y. Mezui
Affiliation:
Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble-INP, LEGI, F-38000 Grenoble, France
M. Obligado
Affiliation:
Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble-INP, LEGI, F-38000 Grenoble, France
A. Cartellier*
Affiliation:
Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble-INP, LEGI, F-38000 Grenoble, France
*
Email address for correspondence: alain.cartellier@cnrs.fr

Abstract

The hydrodynamics of bubble columns in the heterogeneous regime is investigated from experiments with bubbles at large particle Reynolds numbers and without coalescence. The void fraction field $\varepsilon$ at small scales, analysed with Voronoï tessellations, corresponds to a random Poisson process (RPP) in homogeneous conditions but it significantly differs from an RPP in the heterogeneous regime. The distance to an RPP allows identifying meso-scale structures, namely clusters, void regions and intermediate regions. A series of arguments demonstrate that the bubble motion is driven by the dynamics of these structures. Notably, bubbles in clusters (respectively in intermediate regions) are moving up faster, up to 3.5 (respectively 2) times the terminal velocity, than bubbles in void regions whose absolute velocity equals the mean liquid velocity. In addition, the mean unconditional relative velocity of bubbles is recovered from mean relative velocities conditional to meso-scale structures, weighted by the proportion of bubbles in each structure. Assuming buoyancy–inertia equilibrium for each structure, the relative velocity is related to the characteristic size and concentration of meso-scale structures. By considering the latter quantity's values at large gas superficial velocities, a cartoon of the internal flow structure is proposed. Arguments are proposed to help understanding why the relative velocity scales as $(gD\varepsilon )^{1/2}$ (with $D$ the column's diameter and $g$ gravity's acceleration). The proposed cartoon seems consistent with a fast-track mechanism that, for the moderate Rouse numbers studied, leads to liquid velocity fluctuations proportional to the relative velocity. The potential impact of coalescence on the above analysis is also commented.

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Besagni, G., Inzoli, F. & Ziegenhein, T. 2018 Two-phase bubble columns: a comprehensive review. Chem. Engng 2 (2), 13.Google Scholar
Cartellier, A.H. 2019 Bubble columns hydrodynamics revisited according to new experimental data. In Recent advances in bubble columns organized by EFCE and SFGP.Google Scholar
Cholemari, M.R. & Arakeri, J.H. 2009 Axially homogeneous, zero mean flow buoyancy-driven turbulence in a vertical pipe. J. Fluid Mech. 621, 69102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Climent, E. & Magnaudet, J. 1999 Large-scale simulations of bubble-induced convection in a liquid layer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (24), 4827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Nevers, N. 1968 Bubble driven fluid circulations. AIChE J. 14 (2), 222226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferenc, J.-S. & Néda, Z. 2007 On the size distribution of poisson voronoi cells. Physica A 385 (2), 518526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gemello, L., Cappello, V., Augier, F., Marchisio, D. & Plais, C. 2018 CFD-based scale-up of hydrodynamics and mixing in bubble columns. Chem. Engng Res. Des. 136, 846858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishii, M. 1975 Thermo-fluid dynamic theory of two-phase flow. NASA Sti/recon Tech. Rep. A 75, 29657.Google Scholar
Ishii, M. & Zuber, N. 1979 Drag coefficient and relative velocity in bubbly, droplet or particulate flows. AIChE J. 25 (5), 843855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joshi, J.B., Parasu, U.V., Prasad, C.V.S., Phanikumar, D.V., Deshpande, N.S. & Thorat, B.N. 1998 Gas hold-up structures in bubble column reactors. Proc. Indian Natl Sci. Acad. 64 (4), 441567.Google Scholar
Kantarci, N., Borak, F. & Ulgen, K.O. 2005 Bubble column reactors. Process Biochem. 40 (7), 22632283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kikukawa, H. 2017 Physical and transport properties governing bubble column operations. Intl J. Multi-phase Flows 93, 115129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, R. & Iga, K. 1995 Bubble convection. Mixing Geophys. Flows 749, 3551.Google Scholar
Krishna, R., Wilkinson, P.M. & Van Dierendonck, L.L. 1991 A model for gas holdup in bubble columns incorporating the influence of gas density on flow regime transitions. Chem. Engng Sci. 46 (10), 24912496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, A., Mezui, Y., Obligado, M., Gluck, S. & Cartellier, A. 2022 A new, optimized doppler optical probe for phase detection, bubble velocity and size measurements: investigation of a bubble column operated in the heterogeneous regime. Chem. Engng Sci. 250, 117359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liepmann, H.W. & Robinson, M.S. 1953 Counting methods and equipment for mean-value measurements in turbulence research. NACA Tech. Rep. 3037. National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics.Google Scholar
McClure, D.D., Kavanagh, J.M., Fletcher, D.F. & Barton, G.W. 2017 Experimental investigation into the drag volume fraction correction term for gas–liquid bubbly flows. Chem. Engng Sci. 170, 9197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mezui, Y., Cartellier, A.H. & Obligado, M. 2018 Characterization of bubbles clusters in bubble column. In Dispersed Two-Phase Flows 2018, SHF colloquium. Toulouse, France, hal-01904598.Google Scholar
Mezui, Y., Cartellier, A. & Obligado, M. 2023 An experimental study on the liquid phase properties of a bubble column operated in the homogeneous and in the heterogeneous regimes. Chem. Engng Sci. 268, 118381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mezui, Y., Obligado, M. & Cartellier, A. 2022 Buoyancy-driven bubbly flows: scaling of velocities in bubble columns operated in the heterogeneous regime. J. Fluid Mech. 952, A10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monchaux, R., Bourgoin, M. & Cartellier, A. 2010 Preferential concentration of heavy particles: a voronoï analysis. Phys. Fluids 22 (10), 103304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mora, D.O., Aliseda, A., Cartellier, A. & Obligado, M. 2018 Pitfalls measuring 1D inertial particle clustering. In iTi Conference on Turbulence, pp. 221–226. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mora, D.O., Aliseda, A., Cartellier, A. & Obligado, M. 2019 Characterizing 1d inertial particle clustering. arXiv:1906.09896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mora, D.O., Obligado, M., Aliseda, A. & Cartellier, A. 2021 Effect of $Re \lambda$ and rouse numbers on the settling of inertial droplets in homogeneous isotropic turbulence. Phys. Rev. Fluids 6 (4), 044305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakamura, K., Yoshikawa, H.N., Tasaka, Y. & Murai, Y. 2020 Linear stability analysis of bubble-induced convection in a horizontal liquid layer. Phys. Rev. E 102 (5), 053102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nedeltchev, S. 2020 Precise identification of the end of the gas maldistribution in bubble columns equipped with perforated plate gas distributors. Chem. Engng J. 386, 121535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panicker, N., Passalacqua, A. & Fox, R.O. 2020 Computational study of buoyancy driven turbulence in statistically homogeneous bubbly flows. Chem. Engng Sci. 216, 115546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raimundo, P.M. 2015 Analyse et modélisation de l'hydrodynamique locale dans les colonnes à bulles. PhD thesis, Université Grenoble Alpes (ComUE).Google Scholar
Raimundo, P.M., Cloupet, A., Cartellier, A., Beneventi, D. & Augier, F. 2019 Hydrodynamics and scale-up of bubble columns in the heterogeneous regime: comparison of bubble size, gas holdup and liquid velocity measured in 4 bubble columns from 0.15 m to 3 m in diameter. Chem. Engng Sci. 198, 5261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rollbusch, P., Bothe, M., Becker, M., Ludwig, M., Grünewald, M., Schlüter, M. & Franke, R. 2015 Bubble columns operated under industrially relevant conditions – current understanding of design parameters. Chem. Engng Sci. 126, 660678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruzicka, M.C. 2013 On stability of a bubble column. Chem. Engng Res. Des. 91 (2), 191203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonnet, M., Gentric, C., Olmos, E. & Midoux, N. 2007 Experimental determination of the drag coefficient in a swarm of bubbles. Chem. Engng Sci. 62 (3), 858866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumbekova, S., Aliseda, A., Cartellier, A. & Bourgoin, M. 2016 Clustering and settling of inertial particles in turbulence. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Jets, Wakes and Separated Flows (ICJWSF2015), pp. 475–482. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumbekova, S., Cartellier, A., Aliseda, A. & Bourgoin, M. 2017 Preferential concentration of inertial sub-kolmogorov particles: the roles of mass loading of particles, Stokes numbers, and Reynolds numbers. Phys. Rev. Fluids 2 (2), 024302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhlmann, M. 2020 Voronoï tessellation analysis of sets of randomly placed finite-size spheres. Physica A 555, 124618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, L.-P. & Maxey, M.R. 1993 Settling velocity and concentration distribution of heavy particles in homogeneous isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 256, 2768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuber, N. & Findlay, J. 1965 Average volumetric concentration in two-phase flow systems. Trans. ASME J. Heat Transfer 87 (4), 453468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar