Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-07T07:01:07.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Boundary interactions for two-dimensional granular flows. Part 1. Flat boundaries, asymmetric stresses and couple stresses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Charles S. Campbell
Charles S. Campbell
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles CA 90089-1453, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The behaviour of a granular flow at a boundary cannot be specified independently of what is happening in the rest of the flow field. This paper describes a study of two fictitious, but instructive, flat boundary types using a computer simulation of a two-dimensional granular flow with the goal of trying to understand the possible effects of the boundary on the flow. The two boundary conditions, Type A and Type B, differ largely in the way that they apply torques to the flow particles. During a particle–wall collision, the Type A boundary applies the force at the particle surface, thus applying the largest mechanistically possible torque to the particle, while the Type B boundary applies the force directly to the particle centre, resulting in the application of zero torque. Though a small change on continuum scales (i.e. the point at which the force is applied has only been moved by a particle radius) it makes a huge difference to the macroscopic behaviour of the system. Generally, it was found that, near boundaries, large variations in continuum properties occur over distances of a particle diameter, a non-continuum scale, throwing into doubt whether boundaries may be accurately modelled via continuum mechanics. Finally, the large torques applied to the particles by the Type A boundary induce asymmetries in the stress tensor, which, in these steady flows, are balanced by gradients in a couple stress tensor. Thus, near boundaries, a frictional granular material must be modelled as a polar fluid.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 247 , February 1993 , pp. 111 - 136
Copyright
© 1993 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahn, H., Brennen, C. E. & Sabersky, R. H. 1991 Measurement of the velocity, velocity fluctuation, density and stresses for chute flows of granular material. Trans. ASME E: J. Appl. Mech. 58, 792– 803.Google Scholar
Augenstein, D. A. & Hogg, R. 1978 An experimental study of the flow of dry powders over inclined surfaces. Powder Tech. 19, 205– 215.Google Scholar
Bagnold, R. A. 1954 Experiments on a gravity-free dispersion of large solid particles in a Newtonian fluid under shear. Proc. R. Sac. Lond. A 225, 49– 63.Google Scholar
Bailard, J. 1978 An experimental study of granular-fluid flow. PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
Campbell, C. S. 1982 Shear flows of granular materials. PhD thesis; and Rep. E-200.7. Division of Engineering and Applied Science, California Institute, of Technology.
Campbell, C. S. 1988 Boundary interactions for two-dimensional granular flows: asymmetric stresses and couple stresses. In Micromechanics of Granular Materials (ed. M. Satake & J. T. Jenkins), pp. 163– 174. Elsevier.
Campbell, C. S. 1989 The stress tensor for simple shear flows of a granular material. J. Fluid Mech. 203, 449– 473.Google Scholar
Campbell, C. S. 1990 Rapid granular flows. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 22, 57– 92.Google Scholar
Campbell, C. S. 1993 Boundary interactions for two-dimensional granular flows. Part 2. Roughened boundaries. J. Fluid Mech. 247, 137– 156.Google Scholar
Campbell, C. S. & Brennen, C. E. 1985a Computer simulation of granular shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 151, 167– 188.Google Scholar
Campbell, C. S. & Brennen, C. E. 1985b Chute flows of granular material: some computer simulations. Trans. ASME E: J. Appl. Mech. 52, 172– 178.Google Scholar
Campbell, C. S. & Gong, A. 1986 The stress tensor in a two-dimensional granular shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 164, 107– 125.Google Scholar
Craig, K., Buckholtz, R. H. & Domoto, G. 1987 The effects of shear surface boundaries on stresses for the rapid shear of dry powers. Trans. ASME J. Tribol. 109, 232– 237.Google Scholar
Drake, T. G. & Shreve, R. L. 1986 High speed motion pictures of nearly steady, uniform, two-dimensional, inertial flows of granular material. J. Rheol. 30, 981– 993.Google Scholar
Hanes, D. M. & Inman, D. L. 1985 Observations of rapidly flowing granular fluid flow. J. Fluid Mech. 150, 357– 380.Google Scholar
Hanes, D. M., Jenkins, J. T. & Richman, M. W. 1988 The thickness of steady plane shear flows of circular disks driven by identical boundaries. Trans. ASME E: J. Appl. Mech. 55, 969– 974.Google Scholar
Hui, K., Haff, P. K., Ungar, J. E. & Jackson, R. 1984 Boundary conditions for high shear grain flows. J. Fluid Mech. 145, 223– 233.Google Scholar
Ishida, M. & Shirai, T. 1979 Velocity distributions in the flow of solid particles in an inclined open channel. J. Chem. Engng Japan 12, 46– 50.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. T. & Richman, M. W. 1986 Boundary conditions for plane flows of smooth, nearly elastic, circular disks. J. Fluid Mech. 171, 53– 69.Google Scholar
Richman, M. W. 1988 Boundary conditions based upon a modified Maxwellian velocity distribution for flows of identical, smooth, nearly elastic spheres. Acta Mechanica 75, 227– 240.Google Scholar
Richman, M. W. & Chou, C. S. 1988 Boundary effects on granular shear flows of smooth disks. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 39, 885– 901.Google Scholar
Ridgway, K. & Rupp, R. 1970 Flow of granular material down chutes. Chem. Proc. Engng 51, 82– 85.Google Scholar
Savage, S. B. 1979 Gravity flow of cohesionless granular materials in chutes and channels. J. Fluid Mech. 92, 53– 96.Google Scholar
Savage, S. B. & Sayed, M. 1984 Stresses developed by dry cohesionless granular materials in an annular shear cell. J. Fluid Mech. 142, 391– 430.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. & Campbell, C. S. 1992 The interface between fluid-like and solid-like behavior in two-dimensional granular flows. J. Fluid Mech. 237, 541– 568.Google Scholar