Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T18:12:51.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Longer Look at the Asymmetric Dependence between Hedge Funds and the Equity Market

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2010

Byoung Uk Kang
Affiliation:
School of Accounting and Finance, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong. afbkang@inet.polyu.edu.hk
Francis In
Affiliation:
Department of Accounting and Finance, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia. francis.in@buseco.monash.edu.au
Gunky Kim
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Applied Statistics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia. gkim@uow.edu.au
Tong Suk Kim
Affiliation:
KAIST Business School, KAIST, 87 Hoegiro, Dongdaemoon-gu, Seoul, 130-722, Korea. tskim@business.kaist.ac.kr

Abstract

This paper reexamines, at a range of investment horizons, the asymmetric dependence between hedge fund returns and market returns. Given the current availability of hedge fund data, the joint distribution of longer-horizon returns is extracted from the dynamics of monthly returns using the filtered historical simulation; we then apply the method based on copula theory to uncover the dependence structure therein. While the direction of asymmetry remains unchanged, the magnitude of asymmetry is attenuated considerably as the investment horizon increases. Similar horizon effects also occur on the tail dependence. Our findings suggest that nonlinearity in hedge fund exposure to market risk is more short term in nature, and that hedge funds provide higher benefits of diversification, the longer the horizon.

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agarwal, V., and Naik, N. Y.. “Multi-Period Performance Persistence Analysis of Hedge Funds.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 35 (2000), 327342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agarwal, V., and Naik, N. Y.. “Risks and Portfolio Decisions Involving Hedge Funds.” Review of Financial Studies, 17 (2004), 6398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ang, A., and Chen, J.. “Asymmetric Correlations of Equity Portfolios.” Journal of Financial Economics, 63 (2002), 443494.Google Scholar
Aragon, G. O. “Share Restrictions and Asset Pricing: Evidence from the Hedge Fund Industry.” Journal of Financial Economics, 83 (2007), 3358.Google Scholar
Asness, C.; Krail, R.; and Liew, J.. “Do Hedge Funds Hedge?Journal of Portfolio Management, 28 (2001), 619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bansal, R., and Kiku, D.. “Cointegration and Long-Run Asset Allocation.” Working Paper, Duke University (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barone-Adesi, G.; Bourgoin, F.; and Giannopoulos, K.. “Don’t Look Back.” Risk, 11 (1998), 100104.Google Scholar
Barone-Adesi, G.; Giannopoulos, K.; and Vosper, L.. “VaR without Correlations for Portfolios of Derivative Securities.” Journal of Futures Markets, 19 (1999), 583602.3.0.CO;2-S>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollerslev, T., and Wooldridge, J. M.. “Quasi-Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference in Dynamic Models with Time-Varying Covariances.” Econometric Reviews, 11 (1992), 143172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyson, N. M.; Stahel, C. W.; and Stulz, R. M.. “Is There Hedge Fund Contagion?” Working Paper, NBER (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breymann, W.; Dias, A.; and Embrechts, P.. “Dependence Structures for Multivariate High-Frequency Data in Finance.” Quantitative Finance, 3 (2003), 114.Google Scholar
Brown, S. J., and Spitzer, J. F.. “Caught by the Tail: Tail Risk Neutrality and Hedge Fund Returns.” Working Paper, New York University (2006).Google Scholar
Campbell, J. Y., and Viceira, L. M.. “The Term Structure of the Risk–Return Trade-Off.” Financial Analysts Journal, 61 (2005), 3444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X., and Fan, Y.. “Estimation and Model Selection of Semiparametric Copula-Based Multivariate Dynamic Models under Copula Misspecification.” Journal of Econometrics, 135 (2006), 125154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherubini, U.; Luciano, E.; and Vecchiato, W.. Copula Methods in Finance. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dias, A., and Embrechts, P.. “Modeling Exchange Rate Dependence at Different Time Horizons.” Working Paper, University of Warwick (2007).Google Scholar
Dobrić, J., and Schmid, F.. “Testing Goodness of Fit for Parametric Families of Copulas–Application to Financial Data.” Communications in Statistics–Simulation and Computation, 34 (2005), 10531068.Google Scholar
Dobrić, J., and Schmid, F.. “A Goodness of Fit Test for Copulas Based on Rosenblatt’s Transformation.” Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 51 (2007), 46334642.Google Scholar
Engle, R. F. “Dynamic Conditional Correlation: A Simple Class of Multivariate Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity Models.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 20 (2002), 339350.Google Scholar
Engle, R. F., and Sheppard, K.. “Theoretical and Empirical Properties of Dynamic Conditional Correlation Multivariate GARCH.” Working Paper, NBER (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fung, W., and Hsieh, D. A.. “The Risk in Hedge Fund Strategies: Theory and Evidence from Trend Followers.” Review of Financial Studies, 14 (2001), 313341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fung, W., and Hsieh, D. A.. “Hedge Fund Benchmarks: A Risk-Based Approach.” Financial Analysts Journal, 60 (2004), 6580.Google Scholar
Genest, C.; Ghoudi, K.; and Rivest, L.-P.. “A Semiparametric Estimation Procedure of Dependence Parameters in Multivariate Families of Distributions.” Biometrika, 82 (1995), 543552.Google Scholar
Genest, C., and Rivest, L.-P.. “Statistical Inference Procedures for Bivariate Archimedean Copulas.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88 (1993), 10341043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Getmansky, M.; Lo, A. W.; and Makarov, I.. “An Econometric Model of Serial Correlation and Illiquidity in Hedge Fund Returns.” Journal of Financial Economics, 74 (2004), 529609.Google Scholar
Hong, Y.; Tu, J.; and Zhou, G.. “Asymmetries in Stock Returns: Statistical Tests and Economic Evaluation.” Review of Financial Studies, 20 (2007), 15471581.Google Scholar
Hu, L. “Dependence Patterns across Financial Markets: A Mixed Copula Approach.” Applied Financial Economics, 16 (2006), 717729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joe, H.Multivariate Models and Dependence Concepts. London, UK: Chapman & Hall (1997).Google Scholar
Junker, M., and May, A.. “Measurement of Aggregate Risk with Copulas.” Econometrics Journal, 8 (2005), 428454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jurek, J. W., and Viceira, L. M.. “Optimal Value and Growth Tilts in Long-Horizon Portfolios.” Working Paper, Harvard University (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, G.; Silvapulle, M. J.; and Silvapulle, P.. “Comparison of Semiparametric and Parametric Methods for Estimating Copulas.” Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 51 (2007), 28362850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, G.; Silvapulle, M. J.; and Silvapulle, P.. “Estimating the Error Distribution in Multivariate Heteroscedastic Time-Series Models.” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 138 (2008), 14421458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klugman, S. A., and Parsa, R.. “Fitting Bivariate Loss Distributions with Copulas.” Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 24 (1999), 139148.Google Scholar
Levy, H.; Guttman, I.; and Tkatch, I.. “Regression, Correlation, and the Time Interval: Additive-Multiplicative Framework.” Management Science, 47 (2001), 11501159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, H., and Schwarz, G.. “Correlation and the Time Interval over which the Variables Are Measured. Journal of Econometrics, 76 (1997), 341350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ljung, G. M., and Box, G. E. P.. “On a Measure of Lack of Fit in Time Series Models.” Biometrika, 65 (1978), 297303.Google Scholar
Lo, A. W. “Risk Management for Hedge Funds: Introduction and Overview.” Financial Analysts Journal, 57 (2001), 1633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longin, F., and Solnik, B.. “Extreme Correlation of International Equity Markets.” Journal of Finance, 56 (2001), 649676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, M., and Pulvino, T.. “Characteristics of Risk and Return in Risk Arbitrage.” Journal of Finance, 56 (2001), 21352175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, D. S. “Tests of Chi-Squared Type.” In Goodness-of-Fit Techniques, D’Agostino, R. B., and Stevens, M. A., eds. New York, NY: Dekker (1986).Google Scholar
Patton, A. J. “On the Out-of-Sample Importance of Skewness and Asymmetric Dependence for Asset Allocation.” Journal of Financial Econometrics, 2 (2004), 130168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patton, A. J. “Modelling Asymmetric Exchange Rate Dependence.” International Economic Review, 47 (2006), 527556.Google Scholar
Patton, A. J. “Are ‘Market Neutral’ Hedge Funds Really Market Neutral?Review of Financial Studies, 22 (2009), 24952530.Google Scholar
Politis, D. N., and Romano, J. P.. “The Stationary Bootstrap.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89 (1994), 13031313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Politis, D. N., and White, H.. “The Automatic Block-Length Selection for the Dependent Bootstrap.” Econometric Reviews, 23 (2004), 5370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poon, S.-H.; Rockinger, M.; and Tawn, J.. “Extreme Value Dependence in Financial Markets: Diagnostics, Models, and Financial Implications.” Review of Financial Studies, 17 (2004), 581610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritsker, M. “The Hidden Dangers of Historical Simulation.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 30 (2006), 561582.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, J. C. “Measuring Financial Contagion: A Copula Approach.” Journal of Empirical Finance, 14 (2007), 401423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenblatt, M. “Remarks on a Multivariate Transformation.” Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 23 (1952), 470472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R., and Stadtmüller, U.. “Non-Parametric Estimation of Tail Dependence.” Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 33 (2006), 307335.Google Scholar
Sklar, A. “Fonctions de Répartition à n Dimensions et Leurs Marges.” Publications de l’Institut Statistique de l’Université de Paris, 8 (1959), 229231.Google Scholar