Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T23:39:58.301Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In Defense (Again) of “Silly Little Bobtailed” Coal Wagons: Reply to Peter Scott

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Hudson, Bill. Private awner Wagons. Vol.3. Poole, Dorset: Oxford Publishing, 1984.Google Scholar
Liebowitz, S. J., and Margolis, Stephen. “Path-Dependence, Lock-In, and History.Journal of Law, Economics, and Organizations 11, no. 1 (1995): 205–26.Google Scholar
Scott, Peter. “The Efficiency of Britain's Silly Little Bobtailed’ Coal Wagons: A Comment on Van Vleck.” This JOURNAL 59, no. 4 (1999): 1072–80.Google Scholar
Van, Vleck, Nee L., Va. “Delivering Coal by Road and Rail in Britain: The Efficiency of the ‘Silly Little Bobtailed’ Coal Wagons.” This JOURNAL 57, no. 1 (1997): 139–60.Google Scholar
Van, Vleck, Nee L., Va “Reassessing Technological Backwardness: Absolving the ‘Silly Little Bobtailed’ Coal Car.” Ph.D. diss., University of Iowa, 1993.Google Scholar