Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T17:53:14.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An examination of teat drying with disinfectant impregnated cloths on the bacteriological quality of milk and on the transfer of Streptococcus agalactiae before milking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Charles H. McKinnon ,
Trevor M. Higgs  and
A. John Bramley
Charles H. McKinnon
Affiliation:
†National Institute for Research in Dairying (University of Reading), Shinfield, Reading RG2 9 AT, UK
Trevor M. Higgs
Affiliation:
†National Institute for Research in Dairying (University of Reading), Shinfield, Reading RG2 9 AT, UK
A. John Bramley
Affiliation:
†National Institute for Research in Dairying (University of Reading), Shinfield, Reading RG2 9 AT, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Total bacterial counts of the milk from individual cows were measured for three groups of ten winter housed cows at three milkings. The teats were either (i) left unwashed or (ii) washed with disinfected water (60 ppm available iodine) and dried with individual paper towels or (iii) washed with plain water and then dried with a single fabric cloth impregnated with a polymeric bisguanide and a quaternary ammonium compound. The mean total bacterial counts/ml for the groups were 5820, 2108 and 1116 respectively. Treatments (ii) and (iii) were also compared for their ability to prevent the inter-teat transfer of bacteria. Before teat washing and drying, one teat of each cow was deliberately contaminated with Streptococcus agalactiae. Significantly fewer teats (5/30) became contaminated with Str. agalactiae when treatment (iii) was used for teat washing and drying compared with treatment (ii) (20/30).

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 52 , Issue 3 , August 1985 , pp. 355 - 359
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bramley, A. J. 1981 The role of hygiene in preventing intrammary infection. In Mastitis Control and Herd Management pp. 53–66 (Ed. Bramley, A. J., Dodd, F. H. and Griffin, T. K.). Shinfield, Reading: National Institute for Research in Dairying (NIRD-HRI Technical Bulletins no. 4).Google Scholar
British Standards Institution 1968 Methods of microbiological examination for dairy purposes. London: B.S.I. (BS no. 4285).Google Scholar
Grindal, R. J., Griffin, T. K., Bramley, A. J. & Hioos, T. M. 1983 Effect of udder preparation on exposure to mastitis infection and disease. Report 1982 National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading p. 38.Google Scholar
International Dairy Federation 1981 Laboratory methods for use in mastitis work. International Dairy Federation Bulletin Document no. 132.Google Scholar
McKinnon, C. H., Cousins, C. M. & Fulford, R. J. 1973 b An in-line milk sampler for determining the numbers of bacteria derived from teat surfaces and udder infections of cows milked in recorder machines. Journal of Dairy Research 40 47–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKinnon, C. H., Fulford, R. J. & Cousins, C. M. 1983 Effect of teat washing on the bacteriological contamination of milk from cows kept under various housing conditions. Journal of Dairy Research 50 153–162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKinnon, C. H., Riches, M. E., Underwood, H. M., Cousins, C. M. & Davies, F. L. 1973 a Sources of bacteria in milk. Report, National Institute for Research in Dairying 1971–2 114.Google Scholar
North, R. A. E. 1980 Food contact surface disinfectants: additional criteria for selection. Environmental Health 01 1–4Google Scholar