Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-tr9hg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-19T08:46:33.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

286. The plate count and methylene-blue reduction test applied to milk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

H. Barkworth ,
J. O. Irwin  and
A. T. R. Mattick
H. Barkworth
Affiliation:
South-Eastern Agricultural College, Wye, Kent
J. O. Irwin
Affiliation:
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
A. T. R. Mattick
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Defining sensitivity as the power of discriminating significantly between milks of different bacterial constitution the plate count is slightly less sensitive than the methylene-blue test observed every 5 min. and slightly more sensitive than the latter observed every half-hour.

2. The logarithm of the plate count is, in our opinion, the correct measure to use. Its coefficient of variation is slightly less than that of the methylene-blue test observed every 5 min.

3. The plate count as formerly used and the methylene-blue test as now used agree in grading in over 80% of cases.

4. Two samples whose reduction times differ by 30 min. are not significantly different. Such a difference is only significant if the result is based on the mean of duplicate tests with 5 min. observations or of triplicate tests with half-hourly observations.

5. Provided transit hazards are eliminated and standard technique is very carefully observed, there is no significant difference in results from different laboratories by either test.

6. Neither test necessarily reflects minor changes or faults in production routine. Under the conditions of our experiment the methylene-blue test was not, in cold weather, a satisfactory indicator of the numbers of organisms as distinct from ‘activity’.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , September 1941 , pp. 265 - 314
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1941

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Mattick, , McClemont, & Irwin, (1935). J. Dairy Res. 6, 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Wilson, (1936). The bacteriological grading of milk. Spec. Rep. Ser. Med. Res. Coun., Lond., no. 206.Google Scholar
(3)Min. Agric. (1934). Guide to the Conduct of Clean Milk Competitions, 5th ed. Bull. no. 46.Google Scholar
(4)Min. Health (1929). Memo. 139/Foods.Google Scholar
(5)Barkworth, (1935). J. Dairy Res. 6, 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Robertson, & Frayer, (1930). Bull. Vt agric. Exp. Sta. nos. 314–18.Google Scholar
(7)Hiscox, , Hoy, , Lomax, & Mattick, (1932). J. Dairy Res. 4, 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Barkworth, (1936). J. Hyg., Camb., 36, 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9)Mattick, & Neave, (1938). Proc. Soc. Agric. Bact. Abstracts.Google Scholar
(10)Malcolm, & Leitch, (1936). Scot. J. Agric. 19, 321.Google Scholar
(11)Johns, (1930). Sci. Agric. 11, 171.Google Scholar
(12)Hoy, & Braz, (1938). Proc. Soc. Agric. Bact. Abstracts.Google Scholar
(13)Pirrie, (1938). Proc. Soc. Agric. Bact. Abstracts.Google Scholar
(14)Thomas, & Tudor, (1937). Welsh J. Agric. 13, 308.Google Scholar
(15)Barkworth, (1931). J. Hyg., Camb., 31, 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(16)Mattick, (1934). Conf. Adv. Bact. paper 66.Google Scholar
(17)Barkworth, (1937). Proc. Soc. Agric. Bact. Abstracts.Google Scholar
(18)Barkworth, (1938). J. S. E. Agric. Coll. 42, 105.Google Scholar
(19)Nichols, & Edwards, (1936). J. Dairy Res. 7, 258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(20)Stott, & Barkworth, (1937). Publ. Hlth, 9, 50.Google Scholar
(21)Frayer, (1937). Bull. Vt agric. Exp. Sta. no. 424.Google Scholar
(22)Johns, (1938). J. Dairy Sci. 21, 227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(23)Barkworth, (1935). Proc. Soc. Agric. Bact. Abstracts.Google Scholar
(24)Safford, & Stark, (1935). J. Dairy Sci. 18, 539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(25)Safford, & Stark, (1937). J. Dairy Sci. 20, 577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(26)Barkworth, (1938). Milk Pl. Mon. 27, 10, 49.Google Scholar
(27)Min. Health (1937). Memo. 139/Foods.Google Scholar
(28)Fisher, (1936). Statistical Methods for Research Workers, 6th ed. London: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
(29)Barkworth, (1936). J. Dairy Res. 7, 244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(30)Nichols, & Jackson, (1938). Proc. Soc. Agric. Bact. Abstracts.Google Scholar