Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T00:39:37.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

218 Reframing the JTF Clinical Trial Competencies from a CRP Team Science Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2022

Robert H. Kolb
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Carolynn Jones
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University
Jessica Fritter
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University
Karen Carter
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University
Nicole Summerside
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Nicole Exe
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Jennifer Sprecher
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Elizabeth Kopras
Affiliation:
University of Cincinnati
Ty Saldana
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University
David Aslaner
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University
Laura Hildreth
Affiliation:
University of Cincinnati
Nopporn Thanthaeng
Affiliation:
Harvard (Mass General Hospital)
Katherine Owens
Affiliation:
University of Alabama at Birmingham
JT Means
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University
Bernadette Capili
Affiliation:
Rockefeller University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Our goal is to explore and collaboratively identify the team science competencies essential for Clinical Research Professionals at all experience levels and how these competencies relate to the Joint Task Force for Clinical Translational Research Professionals Competencies. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Team science competencies for clinical research professionals are poorly defined. The JTF Clinical Trial Competencies lack sufficient emphasis on team science, though it is briefly included in two JTF competency domains: Leadership & Professionalism, and Communication & Teamwork. The competencies primarily focus on tasks related to clinical research and basic knowledge of product development; however, a conceptual model for applying the competencies using a team science lens is needed. Currently, the JTF competency figure is often thought of as sequential, given the competencies are numbered, creating the misconception that the last competencies are less important. We support a new figure showing the permeability of team science across competencies and the connectedness and equality of the competencies. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Our anticipated results are to show the integral nature of team science in clinical research professional communities of practice. Once complete, we will have identified measurable team science competency-based skills essential for clinical research professionals at various levels of expertise. Understanding the multi-dimensional team science competencies will inform targeted team science education and training for clinical research professionals. Our revised competency framework provides an improved team science conceptual model for clinical translational science. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Our work will define team science competencies as related to clinical research professionals at all experience levels. The interdependence of teams across clinical trial activities necessitates a consideration of an improved conceptual framework for clinical translational team science competencies.

Type
Education
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. The Association for Clinical and Translational Science