Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T20:37:25.442Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Later rather than sooner: extralinguistic categories in the acquisition of Thai classifiers*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Kathie Carpenter
Kathie Carpenter*
Affiliation:
University of Oregon
*
Department of Linguistics, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An experimental elicitation task with children between the ages of 1;8 and 11;3 shows that children learning Thai numeral classifiers begin with purely distributional information: specifically, (1) that classifiers must appear in the post-numeral position, and (2) that classifiers comprise a conventional, closed set of words. Semantic organizing features, such as salient features of the head noun's referent, appear later than these syntagmatic organizing features. Use of such semantic information is not an immature ‘first guess’ at grammatical categories, but rather, a necessary component of adult linguistic competence, because the categories are productive both for older children and for adults.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , February 1991 , pp. 93 - 113
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The research reported here was part of a doctoral dissertation in the Linguistics Department of Stanford University, funded by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, the National Science Foundation, the Institute of International Education, the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation and the Spencer Foundation, whose support is gratefully acknowledged. I wish to thank Eve V. Clark for helpful comments on earlier versions, and the children, parents and staff of Prince Royal Academy, Dara, Suthep, Baan Dek, Pra Metta, Dek Dii and Regina Schools of Chiang Mai, Thailand, as well as the National Research Council of Thailand.

References

REFERENCES

Adams, K. & Conklin, N. F. (1973). Toward a theory of natural classification. Papers from the ninth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 1–10.Google Scholar
Allan, K. (1977). Classifiers. Language 53. 285–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böhme, K. & Levelt, W. J. M. (1979). Children's use and awareness of natural and syntactic gender in possessive pronouns. Paper presented at the conference on Linguistic awareness and learning to read, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1957). Linguistic determinism and the part of speech. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 55. 1–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burling, R. (1973). Language development of a Garo- and English-speaking child. In Ferguson, C. F. & Slobin, D. I. (eds), Studies of child language development. San Francisco: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Carpenter, K. (1986). Productivity and pragmatics of Thai classifiers. Proceedings of the twelfth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, K. (1987). How children learn to classify nouns in Thai. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
Clark, E. (1977). Universal categories: on the semantics of classifiers and children's early word meanings. In Juilland, A. (ed.), Linguistic studies offered to Joseph Greenberg. Saratoga, CA: Anma Libri.Google Scholar
DeLancey, S. (1986). Toward a history of Tai classifier systems. In Craig, C. (ed.), Noun classes and categorization. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Demuth, K. (1987). Noun classes and agreement in Sesotho acquisition. In Barlow, M. & Ferguson, C. A. (eds), Agreement in natural language: approaches, theories and descriptions. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Erbaugh, M. (1986). Taking stock: acquisition of numeral classifiers in Mandarin Chinese. In Craig, C. (ed.), Noun classes and categorization. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gandour, J., Petty, S. H., Dardarananda, R., Dechongkit, S. & Mukngoen, S. (1984). Acquisition of numeral classifiers in Thai. Linguistics 22. 455–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gathercole, V. (1985). ‘He has too much hard questions’: the acquisition of the linguistic count-mass distinction in much and many. Journal of Child Language 12. 395–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, R. & Gallistel, C. R. (1978). The child's understanding of number. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, P. (1985). Evaluating the semantic categories hypothesis: the case of the count/mass distinction. Cognition 29. 31–54.Google Scholar
Gordon, P. (1988). Count/mass category acquisition: distributional distinctions in children's speech. Journal of Child Language 15. 109–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haas, M. (1942). The use of numeral classifiers in Thai. Language 18. 201–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hecht, B. (1983). Situations and language: children's use of plural allomorphs in familiar and unfamiliar settings. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
Henzi, V. (1975). Acquisition of grammatical gender in Czech. Papers and Reports in Child Language Development 188–98.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1979). A functional approach to child language. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Kunene, E. C. L. (1979). The acquisition of Siswati as a first language: a morphological study with special reference to noun prefixes, noun classes and some agreement markers. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
Levy, Y. (1983). The acquisition of Hebrew plurals: the case of the missing gender category. Journal of Child Language 10. 107–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matsumoto, Y. (1985). Acquisition of some Japanese numeral classifiers: the search for convention. Papers and Reports in Child Language Development 24. 79–86.Google Scholar
Mulford, R. (1985). Comprehension of Icelandic noun gender: semantic vs. formal factors. Journal of Child Language 12. 443–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S. (1984). Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ruke-Dravina, V. (1973). On the emergence of inflection in child language: a contribution based on Latvian speech data. In Ferguson, C. A. & Slobin, D. I. (eds), Studies of child language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Sanches, M. (1977). Language acquisition and language change: Japanese numeral classifiers. Sanches, M. & Blount, B. (eds), Sociocultural dimensions of language change. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Serwatka, M. (1987). Grammar as local order: the case of the count/mass distinction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Colorado, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In Ferguson, C. A. & Slobin, D. I. (eds), Studies of child language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Stromswold, K., Pinker, S. & Kaplan, R. (1985). Cues for understanding the passive voice. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development 24. 123–30.Google Scholar
Suzman, S. A. (1980). Acquisition of the noun class system in Zulu. Papers and Reports in Child Language Development 19. 45–52.Google Scholar
Tuaycharoen, P. (1984). Developmental strategies in the acquisition of numeral classifiers in Thai. Selected papers from the international symposium on language and linguistics at Chiang Mai University. Chiang Mai, Thailand, 203–22.Google Scholar
Tucker, G. R., Lambert, W. E., Rigault, A. & Segalowitz, N. (1968). A psychological investigation of French speakers' skill with grammatical gender. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 7. 312–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whorf, B. L. (1956). The relation of habitual thought and behavior to language. In Carroll, J. B. (ed.), Language, thought and reality. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (1985). ‘Oats’ and ‘wheat’: the fallacy of arbitrariness. In Haiman, J. (ed.), Iconicity in syntax. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar