Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-5xszh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T17:29:28.527Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Authors' response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2015

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reply
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Albright, A. & Hayes, B. (2003). Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: a computational/experimental study. Cognition 90(2), 119–61.Google Scholar
Alegre, M. & Gordon, P. (1999). Frequency effects and the representational status of regular inflections. Journal of Memory and Language 40(1), 4161.Google Scholar
Ambridge, B. (2010). Children's judgments of regular and irregular novel past tense forms: new data on the dual- versus single-route debate. Developmental Psychology 46(6), 1497–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambridge, B., Rowland, C. F. & Pine, J. M. (2008). Is structure dependence an innate constraint? New experimental evidence from children's complex question production. Cognitive Science 32, 222–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aslin, R. N. & Newport, E. L (2012). Statistical learning: from learning items to generalizing rules. Current Directions in Psychological Science 21, 170–6.Google Scholar
Bannard, C. & Matthews, D. (2008) Stored word sequences in language learning – the effect of familiarity on children's repetition of four-word combinations. Psychological Science 19, 241–8.Google Scholar
Bates, E. & Mac Whinney, B. (1982). Functionalist approaches to grammar. In Wanner, E. &Gleitman, L. (eds.), Language acquisition: the state of the art (pp. 173218). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (2010). Language, usage, and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chang, F., Dell, G. S. & Bock, K. (2006). Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review 113, 234–72.Google Scholar
Chang, F., Kidd, E. & Rowland, C. F. (2013). Prediction in processing is a by-product of language learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36, 350–1.Google Scholar
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., March, E. J., Nathan, M . J. & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 14, 458.Google Scholar
Ebbinghaus, H. (1913 [1885]). Memory: a contribution to experimental psychology. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Fodor, D. D. (1998). Parsing to learn. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 27, 339–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freudenthal, D., Pine, J. M. & Gobet, F. (2010). Explaining quantitative variation in the rate of optional infinite errors across languages: a comparison of MOSAIC and the Variational Learning Model. Journal of Child Language 36, 643–69.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work: the nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hale, J. (2006). Uncertainty about the rest of the sentence. Cognitive Science 30, 609–42.Google Scholar
Hsu, H. J. & Bishop, D. V. M. (2010). Grammatical difficulties in children with specific language impairment (SLI): Is learning deficient? Human Development 53, 264–77.Google Scholar
Hurtado, N., Marchman, V. A. & Fernald, A. (2008). Does input influence uptake? Links between maternal talk, processing speed and vocabulary size in Spanish-learning children. Developmental Science 11, F319.Google Scholar
Hutton, J. & Kidd, E. (2011). Structural priming in comprehension of relative clauses: in search of a frequency by regularity interaction. In Kidd, E. (ed.), The acquisition of relative clauses: typology, processing, and function (pp. 227242). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Jaeger, T. F. (2010). Redundancy and reduction: speakers manage syntactic information density. Cognitive Psychology 61, 2362.Google Scholar
Jones, G., Gobet, F. & Pine, J. M. (2008). Computer simulations of developmental change: the contributions of working memory capacity and long-term knowledge. Cognitive Science 32(7), 1148–76.Google Scholar
Kidd, E. (2012). Implicit statistical learning is directly associated with the acquisition of syntax. Developmental Psychology 48, 171–84.Google Scholar
Kidd, E. (2013). The role of verbal working memory in children's sentence comprehension: a critical review. Topics in Language Disorders 33, 208–23.Google Scholar
Kidd, E. & Lum, J. (2008). Sex differences in past tense overregularalization. Developmental Science 11, 882–9.Google Scholar
Kirjavainen, M., Theakston, A. & Lieven, E. (2009). Can input explain children's me-for-I errors? Journal of Child Language 36(5), 1091–114.Google Scholar
Kirjavainen, M., Theakston, A., Lieven, E. & Tomasello, M. (2009). Children's omission of infinitival-to. First Language 29(3), 315–41.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. D. & Elman, J. (2001). Learnability and the statistical structure of language: poverty of stimulus arguments revisited. In Barbora Skarabela, Sarah Fish, & Anna H.-J. Do (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (Vol. 1, pp. 359–370). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. & Bates, E. (1989). The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maratsos, M. (2000). More overregularisations after all: new data and discussion on Marcus, Pinker, Ullman, Hollander, Rosen & Xu. Journal of Child Language 27, 183212.Google Scholar
Marchman, V. A. (1997). Children's productivity in the English past tense: the role of frequency, phonology and neighborhood structure. Cognitive Science 21(3), 283304.Google Scholar
Marchman, V., Wulfeck, B. & Ellis Weismer, S. (1999). Morphological productivity in children with normal language and SLI: a study of the English past tense. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 42, 206–19.Google Scholar
Maslen, R. J. C., Theakston, A. L., Lieven, E. V. M. & Tomasello, M. (2004). A dense corpus study of past tense and plural overregularization in English. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 47, 1319–33.Google Scholar
Matthews, D. E. & Theakston, A. L. (2006). Errors of omission in English-speaking children's production of plurals and the past tense: the effects of frequency, phonology, and competition. Cognitive Science 30(6), 1027–52.Google Scholar
Nitschke, S., Kidd, E. & Serratrice, L. (2010). First language transfer and long-term structural priming in comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes 25, 94114.Google Scholar
Pickering, M. J. & Garrod, S. (2013). An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Science 36, 329–47.Google Scholar
Pine, J. M., Freudenthal, D., Krajewski, G. & Gobet, F. (2013). Do young children have adult-like syntactic categories? Zipf's law and the case of the determiner. Cognition 127(3), 345–60.Google Scholar
Prasada, S. & Pinker, S. (1993). Generalisation of regular and irregular morphological patterns. Language and Cognitive Processes 8, 156.Google Scholar
Räsänen, S. H., Ambridge, B. & Pine, J. M. (2014). Infinitives or bare stems? Are English-speaking children defaulting to the highest-frequency form? Journal of Child Language 41(4), 756–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reali, F. & Christiansen, M. H. (2005). Uncovering the richness of the stimulus: structure dependence and indirect statistical evidence. Cognitive Science 29, 1007–28.Google Scholar
Reber, A. S. (1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: an essay in the cognitive unconscious. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Romberg, A. R. & Saffran, J. R. (2010). Statistical learning and language acquisition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 1(6), 906–14.Google ScholarPubMed
Seidenberg, M. S. & MacDonald, M. C. (1999). A probabilistic constraints approach to language acquisition and processing. Cognitive Science 23, 569–88.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Twomey, K., Chang, F. & Ambridge, B. (2014). Do as I say, not as I do: a lexical distributional account of English locative verb class acquisition. Cognitive Psychology 73, 4171Google Scholar
Wells, J. B., Christiansen, M. H., Race, D. S., Acheson, D. J. & MacDonald, M. C. (2009). Experience and sentence comprehension: statistical learning and relative clause comprehension. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 250–71.Google Scholar