Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-568f69f84b-56sbs Total loading time: 0.281 Render date: 2021-09-16T11:05:54.494Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Maternal label and gesture use affects acquisition of specific object names*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2010

MARIA ZAMMIT*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Reading and Faculty of Health, Leeds Metropolitan University
GRAHAM SCHAFER
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Reading
*Corresponding
Address for correspondence: Maria Zammit, Faculty of Health, Leeds Metropolitan University, Civic Quarter, Calverley Street, Leeds, LS1 3HE. email: m.l.zammit@leedsmet.ac.uk

Abstract

Ten mothers were observed prospectively, interacting with their infants aged 0 ; 10 in two contexts (picture description and noun description). Maternal communicative behaviours were coded for volubility, gestural production and labelling style. Verbal labelling events were categorized into three exclusive categories: label only; label plus deictic gesture; label plus iconic gesture. We evaluated the predictive relations between maternal communicative style and children's subsequent acquisition of ten target nouns. Strong relations were observed between maternal communicative style and children's acquisition of the target nouns. Further, even controlling for maternal volubility and maternal labelling, maternal use of iconic gestures predicted the timing of acquisition of nouns in comprehension. These results support the proposition that maternal gestural input facilitates linguistic development, and suggest that such facilitation may be a function of gesture type.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

The research described in this paper was supported by an ESRC doctoral studentship grant (No R42200134423) to the first author.

References

Acredolo, L. & Goodwyn, S. (1988). Symbolic gesturing in language development. Child Development 59, 450–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anglin, J. A. (1977). Word, object, and conceptual development. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Barrett, M., Harris, M. & Chasin, J. (1991). Early lexical development and maternal speech: A comparison of children's initial and subsequent uses of words. Journal of Child Language 18(1), 2140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, C., Morrison, C. M. & Ellis, A. W. (1997). Naming the Snodgrass and Vanderwart Pictures: Effects of age of acquisition, frequency and name agreement. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 50A(3), 560–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benedict, H. (1979). Early lexical development: Comprehension and production. Journal of Child Language 6, 183200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, E. K. R., Gaskell, A., Babineau, M. D. & Macdonald, S. (2000). Novel word acquisition in children with Down syndrome: Does modality make a difference? Journal of Communication Disorders 33(3), 241–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonvillian, J. D., Orlansky, M. D. & Folven, R. J. (1990). Early sign language acquisition: Implications for theories of language acquisition. In Erting, C. J. (ed.), From gesture to language in hearing and deaf children, 219–32. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brent, M. R. & Siskind, J. M. (2001). The role of exposure to isolated words in early vocabulary development. Cognition 81, 3344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, G. & Harris, T. (1978). Social origins of depression. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Butterworth, G. (2003). Pointing is the royal road to language for babies. In Kita, S. (ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet, 9–33. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Carey, S. & Bartlett, E. (1978). Acquiring a single new word. Papers and Reports in Child Language Development 15, 1729.Google Scholar
Childers, J. B. & Tomasello, M. (2003). Children extend both words and non-verbal actions to novel exemplars. Developmental Science 6(2), 185–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Corte, M., Benedict, H. & Klein, D. (1983). The relationship of pragmatic dimensions of mothers' speech to the referential–expressive distinction. Journal of Child Language 10, 3543.Google ScholarPubMed
Dijkstra, K., Kaschak, M. P. & Zwaan, R. A. (2007). Body posture faciltates retrieval of autobiographical memories. Cognition 102, 139–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Odorico, L., Carubbi, S., Salerni, N. & Calvo, V. (2001). Vocabulary development in Italian children: A longitudinal evaluation of quantitative and qualitative aspects. Journal of Child Language 28, 351–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Bates, E., Thal, D. J. & Pethick, S. J. (1994). Variability in early communicative development. Monographs for the Society for Research in Child Development 59 (Serial No. 242).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenson, L., Marchman, V. A., Thal, D. J., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S. & Bates, E. (2007). MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories: User's guide and technical manual, 2nd edn.Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Furrow, D., Nelson, K. & Benedict, H. (1979). Mothers' speech to children and syntactic development: Some simple relationships. Journal of Child Language 6, 423–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodman, J. C., Dale, P. S. & Li, P. (2008). Does frequency count? Parental input and the acquisition of vocabulary. Journal of Child Language 35, 515–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwyn, S. W. & Acredolo, L. P. (1993). Symbolic gesture versus word – is there a modality advantage for onset of symbol use. Child Development 64(3), 688701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwyn, S. W. & Acredolo, L. P. (1998). Encouraging symbolic gestures: A new perspective on the relationship between gesture and speech. In Iverson, J. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (eds), The nature and function of gesture in children's communication, 6173. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Goodwyn, S. W., Acredolo, L. P. & Brown, C. A. (2000). Impact of symbolic gesturing on early language development. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 24(2), 81–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampson, J. & Nelson, K. (1993). The relation of maternal language to variation in rate and style of language-acquisition. Journal of Child Language 20(2), 313–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoff, E. & Naigles, L. (2002). How children use input to acquire a lexicon. Child Development 73(2), 418–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoff-Ginsberg, E. (1994). Influences of mother and child on maternal talkativeness. Discourse Processes 18, 105117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huttenlocher, J., Haight, W., Bryk, A., Seltzer, M. & Lyons, T. (1991). Early vocabulary growth: Relation to language input and gender. Developmental Psychology 27(2), 236–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iverson, J. M., Capirci, O. & Caselli, M. C. (1994). From communication to language in two modalities. Cognitive Development 9, 2343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iverson, J. M., Capirci, O., Longobardi, E. & Caselli, M. C. (1999). Gesturing in mother–child interactions. Cognitive Development 14(1), 5775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk, 3rd edn.Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1998). Speech and gesture integration. In Iverson, J. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (eds), The nature and functions of gesture in children's communication, 1129. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Morrison, C. M., Chappell, T. D. & Ellis, A. W. (1997). Age of acquisition norms for a large set of object names and their relation to adult estimates and other variables. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 50A(3), 528–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Namy, L. L., Acredolo, L. & Goodwyn, S. (2000). Verbal labels and gestural routines in parental communication with young children. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 24(2), 6379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, K. (1973). Structure and strategy in learning to talk. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 38(149).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, M., Bard, K. A., Linnell, M. & Fluck, M. (2005). Maternal gesture with 20-month-old infants in two contexts. Developmental Science 8(4), 352–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rescorla, L. & Fechnay, T. (1996). Mother–child synchrony and communicative reciprocity in late-talking toddlers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 39(1), 200208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reznick, J. S. & Goldfield, B. A. (1994). Diary vs. representative checklist assessment of productive vocabulary. Journal of Child Language 21(2), 465–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenthal-Robbins, P. (2003). Caregivers' contingent comments to 9-month-old infants: Relationships with later language. Applied Psycholinguistics 24, 221–34.Google Scholar
Rowe, M. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2009). Differences in early gesture explain SES disparities in child vocabulary size at school entry. Science 323, 951–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, R. G. & Terrell, B. Y. (1983). The role of input frequency in lexical acquisition. Journal of Child Language 10, 5764.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shatz, M. (1982). On mechanisms of language acquisition: Can features of the communicative environment account for development? In Wanner, E. G. (ed.), Language acquisition: The state of the art, 102127. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Bornstein, M. H. & Baumwell, L. (2001). Maternal responsiveness and children's achievement of language milestones. Child Development 72, 747–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tan, S. H. & Schafer, G. (2005). Toddlers' novel word learning: Effects of phonological representation, vocabulary size, and parents' ostensive behaviour. First Language 25(2), 131–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zammit, M. & Schafer, G. (in preparation). ‘Gesturese’: Direct comparison of child- and adult-directed gesture in a variety of contexts. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
16
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Maternal label and gesture use affects acquisition of specific object names*
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Maternal label and gesture use affects acquisition of specific object names*
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Maternal label and gesture use affects acquisition of specific object names*
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *