Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-cf9d5c678-5wlnc Total loading time: 0.182 Render date: 2021-07-28T11:58:06.219Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Diversity matters: parent input predicts toddler verb production*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2015

NING HSU
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA
PAMELA A. HADLEY
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA
MATTHEW RISPOLI
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

The contribution of parent input to children's subsequent expressive verb diversity was explored in twenty typically developing toddlers with small verb lexicons. Child developmental factors and parent input measures (i.e. verb quantity, verb diversity, and verb-related structural cues) at age 1;9 were examined as potential predictors of children's verb production in spontaneous language samples at age 2;3. Parent verb input diversity, rather than input quantity, was the primary input factor contributing to children's subsequent verb diversity. Regression analysis showed that verb diversity in parent input at age 1;9 accounted for 30% of the variance in children's verb production six months later, with children's total vocabulary size at age 1;9 accounting for an additional 16% of the variance. These findings demonstrate the relative contributions of developmental and input factors to individual differences in toddlers’ language development and establish the importance of input diversity to verb acquisition.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

Data collection of the archival database used in this study was supported by BCS-08-22513, NSF awarded to Matthew Rispoli. This paper is based upon Ning Hsu's Doctoral Early Research Project completed at the University of Illinois, and was supported by an Illinois Distinguished Fellowship from the Graduate College of the University of Illinois. Portions of this paper were previously presented at the 2014 Symposium on Research in Child Language Disorders, Madison, WI. We are grateful to numerous students who assisted in data collection, transcription, and analyses. Our sincere appreciation extends to participating parents and children who made the work possible.

References

Bates, E., Bretherton, I. & Snyder, L. (1988). From first words to grammar: individual differences and dissociable mechanisms. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bates, E., Marchman, V. A., Thal, D. J., Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Reilly, J. & Hartung, J. (1994). Developmental and stylistic variation in the composition of early vocabulary. Journal of Child Language 21, 85123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Behrend, D. A., Harris, L. L. & Cartwright, K. B. (1995). Morphological cues to verb meaning: verb inflections and the initial mapping of verb meanings. Journal of Child Language 22, 89106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bricker, D. & Squires, J. (1999). Ages and Stages Questionnaire: a parent-completed, child monitoring system, 2nd ed. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
Dale, P. S. & Fenson, L. (1996). Lexical development norms for young children. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 28(1), 125–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Villiers, J. G. (1985). Learning how to use verbs: lexical coding and the influence of the input. Journal of Child Language 12, 587–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, S. L., Guo, L.-Y. & Germezia, M. (2014). How grammatical are 3-year-olds? Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 43, 3652.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenson, L., Marchman, V. A., Thal, D. J., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S. & Bates, E. (2007). The Macarthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories: user's guide and technical manual, 2nd ed. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
Fisher, C., Hall, D. G., Rakowitz, S. & Gleitman, L. R. (1994). When it is better to receive than to give: syntactic and conceptual constraints on vocabulary growth. Lingua 92, 333–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleitman, L. R. (1990). The structural sources of verb meanings. Language Acquisition 1(1), 355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleitman, L. R., Cassidy, K., Nappa, R., Papafragou, A. & Trueswell, J. C. (2005). Hard words. Language Learning and Development 1(1), 2364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadley, P. A. (2006). Assessing the emergence of grammar in toddlers at risk for specific language impairment. Seminars in Speech and Language 27(3), 173–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hadley, P. A., Rispoli, M., Fitzgerald, C. & Bahnsen, A. (2011). Predictors of morphosyntactic growth in typically developing toddlers: contributions of parent input and child sex. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 54(2), 549–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hadley, P. A., Rispoli, M. & Hsu, N. (in press). Toddlers’ verb lexicon diversity and grammatical outcomes. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools.Google Scholar
Hoff, E. & Naigles, L. R. (2002). How children use input to acquire a lexicon. Child Development 73(2), 418–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsu, N. (2014). Parent input and verb lexicon growth. Unpublished doctoral early research project, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Huttenlocher, J., Haight, W., Bryk, A., Seltzer, M. & Lyons, T. (1991). Early vocabulary growth: relation to language input and gender. Developmental Psychology 27(2), 236–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., Waterfall, H. R., Vevea, J. L. & Hedges, L. V. (2007). The varieties of speech to young children. Developmental Psychology 43(5), 1062–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huttenlocher, J., Waterfall, H. R., Vasilyeva, M., Vevea, J. L. & Hedges, L. V. (2010). Sources of variability in children's language growth. Cognitive Psychology 61(4), 343–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jørgensen, R. N., Dale, P. S., Bleses, D. & Fenson, L. (2010). CLEX: a cross-linguistic lexical norms database. Journal of Child Language 37, 419–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landau, B. & Gleitman, L. R. (1985). Language and experience: evidence from the blind child. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Li, P. & Shirai, Y. (2000). The acquisition of lexical and grammatical aspect. Berlin/New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: tools for analyzing talk, 3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Marchman, V. & Thal, D. J. (2005). Words and grammar. In Tomasello, M. & Slobin, D. I. (eds), Beyond nature–nurture: essays in honor of Elizabeth Bates, 141–64. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Miller, J. & Iglesias, A. (2012). Systematic Analysis of Language Transcripts [Computer software]. Middleton, WI: SALT Software, LLC.Google Scholar
Naigles, L. R. & Hoff-Ginsberg, E. (1995). Input to verb learning: evidence for the plausibility of syntactic bootstrapping. Developmental Psychology 31(5), 827–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naigles, L. R. & Hoff-Ginsberg, E. (1998). Why are some verbs learned before other verbs? Effects of input frequency and structure on children's early verb use. Journal of Child Language 25, 95120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naigles, L. R. & Swensen, L. D. (2007). Syntactic supports for word learning. In Hoff, E. & Shatz, M. (eds), Blackwell handbook of language development, 212–31. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, K. (1973). Structure and strategy in learning to talk. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 38, 1135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: the Acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rescorla, L., Roberts, J. & Dahlsgaard, K. (1997). Late talkers at 2: outcome at age 3. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 40(3), 556–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, M. L. (1991). Children with specific language impairment: toward a model of teachability. In Krasnegor, N., Rumbaugh, D. M., Schiefelbusch, R. L. & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (eds), Biological and behavioral determinants of language development, 447–80. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associaties.Google Scholar
Rice, M. L. & Bode, J. V. (1993). GAPS in the verb lexicons of children with specific language impairment. First Language 13(37), 113–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, B. J. (1994). Child-directed speech and influences on language acquisition: methodology and interpretation. In Gallaway, C. & Richards, B. J. (eds), Input and interaction in language acquisition, 74106. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rispoli, M. & Hadley, P. A. (2013). The growth of tense and agreement: final report. National Science Foundation, BCS-0822513.Google Scholar
Rowe, M. L. (2012). A longitudinal investigation of the role of quantity and quality of child-directed speech in vocabulary development. Child Development 83(5), 1762–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shriberg, L. D., Kwiatkowski, J. & Hoffmann, K. (1984). A procedure for phonetic transcription by consensus. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 27(3), 456–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Theakston, A. L. & Rowland, C. F. (2009). The acquisition of auxiliary syntax: a longitudinal elicitation study. Part 1: auxiliary BE. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 52, 1449–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2005). Constructing a language: a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Valian, V. (1999). Input and language acquisition. In Ritchie, W. C. & Bhatia, T. K. (eds), Handbook of child language acquisition, 497527. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Yuan, S., Fisher, C. & Snedeker, J. (2012). Counting the nouns: simple structural cues to verb meaning. Child Development 83(4), 1382–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Diversity matters: parent input predicts toddler verb production*
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Diversity matters: parent input predicts toddler verb production*
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Diversity matters: parent input predicts toddler verb production*
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *