Article contents
“We Don't Want Any German Sausages Here!” Food, Fear, and the German Nation in Victorian and Edwardian Britain
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 November 2013
Abstract
This essay brings together aspects of the history of science, food, and culture, and applies them to the study of Anglo-German relations and perceptions by examining how between 1850 and 1914 the German sausage was used as a metaphor for the German nation. The essay shows how the concerns that became attached to German sausages not only provide a way of understanding Britain's interaction with Germany but also reveal further dimensions to popular anti-German sentiment. Alarm about what went into German sausages formed part of a growing strand of popular opposition to Germany, which drew on increasing insecurity about Britain's position on the world stage and the perceived economic threat that Germany and German immigrants presented. Such sentiment was translated into how Germans were caricatured and onto material objects—in this case, the “deadly mysteries” that were feared to go into German sausages. Cultural and gastronomic stereotypes overlapped in a discourse that linked Germany and Germans to their national diet and aggressive nature, as well as associated German sausages with fears about diseased meat, adulteration, and the risks that eating them entailed. The result was that the German sausage was used as a staple for satirical comic representations of Germany, as representative of dishonesty in food production, and as a xenophobic slur. Around the German sausage, anti-German sentiment and questions of food safety merged and became mutually reinforcing.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The North American Conference on British Studies 2013
References
1 Manchester Guardian, 31 August 1914.
2 Panayi, P., The Enemy in Our Midst: Germans in Britain during the First World War (Oxford, 1991), 223–53Google Scholar; Panayi, P., “Anti-German Riots in Britain during the First World War,” in Racial Violence in Britain in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries, ed. Panayi, P. (Leicester, 1996), 65–66Google Scholar.
3 Daily Mail, 4 February 1916, 10; Wells, H. G., Italy, France and Britain at War (New York, 1917)Google Scholar.
4 Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health 20 (1899): 582–87Google Scholar; Rappaport, E., “Packaging China: Foreign Articles and Dangerous Tastes in the Mid-Victorian Tea Party,” in The Making of the Consumer: Knowledge, Power and Identity in the Modern World, ed. Trentmann, F. (Oxford, 2006), 125–46Google Scholar; Snyder, L. L., “The American-German Pork Dispute, 1879–1891,” Journal of Modern History 17 (1945): 16–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
5 For a full discussion, see Waddington, K., The Bovine Scourge: Meat, Tuberculosis and Public Health, 1850–1914 (Woodford, 2006)Google Scholar.
6 See Waddington, K., “The Dangerous Sausage: Diet, Meat and Disease in Victorian and Edwardian Britain,” Cultural and Social History 8 (2011): 51–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar, which examines the qualitative dimension of working-class diets.
7 Major, P., “Britain and Germany: A Love-Hate Relationship?” German History 26 (2008): 457CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Müller, F. L., Britain and the German Question: Perceptions of Nationalism and Political Reform (Basingstoke, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. On anti-German sentiment and attacks on Germans in Britain, see the excellent studies by Panayi, The Enemy in Our Midst and “Anti-German Riots in Britain,” 65–66.
8 On the standard of living debate, see Feinstein, C. H., “Pessimism Perpetuated: Real Wages and the Standard of Living in Britain During and After the Industrial Revolution,” Journal of Economic History 93 (1998): 625–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
9 See Epstein, J., Radical Expression: Political Language, Ritual and Symbol in England, 1790–1850 (Oxford, 1994)Google Scholar; Trentmann, F., Free Trade Nation: Commerce, Consumption and Civil Society in Modern Britain (Oxford, 2008)Google Scholar.
10 Panayi, P., Spicing Up Britain: The Multicultural History of British History (London, 2008), 12–13Google Scholar.
11 Rogers, B., Beef and Liberty: Roast Beef, John Bull and the English Nation (London, 2003), 5–6Google Scholar.
12 See Christie, R. H., Banquets of the Nations: Eighty-six Dinners Characteristic and Typical of Its Own Country (Edinburgh, 1911), v–xxivGoogle Scholar; Brillat-Savarin, Jean-Anthelme, The Philosophy of Taste (London, 1994), 13Google Scholar.
13 Rogers, Beef and Liberty, 5–6; Rappaport, “Packaging China,” 125–46.
14 See Auslander, L., “Beyond Words,” American Historical Review 110 (2005): 1015–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Warde, A., “Consumption and Theories of Practice,” Journal of Consumer Culture 5 (2005): 131–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Trentmann, F., “Citizenship and Consumption,” Journal of Consumer Culture 7 (2007): 154–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
15 For a survey of Anglo-German relations, see Rüger, Jan, “Revisiting the Anglo-German Antagonism,” Journal of Modern History 83 (2011): 579–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
16 Trentmann, F., “Materiality in the Future of History: Things, Practices and Politics,” Journal of British Studies 48 (2009): 288CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Reinermann, L., “Fleet Street and the Kaiser: British Public Option and Wilhelm II,” German History 26 (2008): 469CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
17 See Rogers, Beef and Liberty, for how culinary issues reflected hostility to the French in the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries.
18 Hampton, M., Visions of the Press in Britain, 1850–1950 (Chicago, 2004), 19Google Scholar; Jones, A., Powers of the Press: Newspapers, Power and the Public in Nineteenth-Century England (Aldershot, 1996)Google Scholar.
19 Rüger, “Revisiting the Anglo-German Antagonism,” 594; Panayi, “Anti-German Riots in Britain,” 74.
20 Rüger, “Revisiting the Anglo-German Antagonism,” 579–617.
21 The Satirist; or, The True Censor of the Times, 25 August 1849, 375.
22 “A Domestic Dialogue,” Leeds Mercury, 15 August 1872, 6; Daily News, 30 November 1889, 5; Leeds Mercury, 29 May 1896, 5.
23 “Sausages,” Bristol Mercury, 20 January 1844, 6; Liverpool Mercury, 22 December 1888, 7; “Little Dinners,” Hearth & Home, 22 June 1899, 263; Newman, G., “The Administrative Control of Food,” Public Health 19 (1906): 76CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
24 See Waddington, “The Dangerous Sausage,” 51–71.
25 See Davis, J. R., The Victorians and Germany (Bern, 2007)Google Scholar; Rüger, “Revisiting the Anglo-German Antagonism,” 579–91.
26 See Feuchtwanger, E., Albert and Victoria: The Rise and Fall of the House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha (London, 2006)Google Scholar.
27 See Panayi, P., German Immigrants in Britain during the Nineteenth Century (Oxford, 1995)Google Scholar; Ashton, R., Little Germany: Exile and Asylum in Victorian England (Oxford, 1986)Google Scholar; Manz, S., Migranten und Internierte: Deutsche in Glasgow 1864–1918 (Stuttgart, 2003)Google Scholar.
28 Panayi, German Immigrants in Britain, 105, 120; German National Cookery for English Kitchens (London, 1873)Google Scholar; Report of the Select Committee on Emigration and Immigration (Foreigners) (London, 1889), 15Google Scholar.
29 “A German Sausage Factory in London,” Glasgow Herald, 23 September 1882, 5; “Bad Meat and Light Punishment,” Liverpool Mercury, 17 July 1879, 6.
30 For a survey of Anglo-German transfer of ideas, technology, and cultural practices, see Blackbourn, D., “‘As Dependent on Each Other as Man and Wife’: Cultural Contacts and Transfers,” in Wilhelmine Germany and Edwardian Britain: Cultural Contacts and Transfers, ed. Geppert, D. and Gerwarth, R. (Oxford, 2008): 15–37Google Scholar. See also Ashton, R., The German Idea: Four English Writers and the Reception of German Thought, 1800–1860 (Cambridge, 1980)Google Scholar; Bridgewater, P., Anglo-German Interactions in the Literature of the 1890s (Oxford, 1999)Google Scholar; Davis, Victorians and Germany; Major, “Britain and Germany: A Love-Hate Relationship?” 457–68; Pieper, A., Music and the Making of Middle-Class Culture (Basingstoke, 2008)Google Scholar; Ramsden, J., Don't Mention the War: The British and the Germans Since 1890 (London, 2006)Google Scholar.
31 Reinermann, “Fleet Street and the Kaiser,” 469–85.
32 “Leeds Mechanics' Institute,” Leeds Mercury, 10 December 1870, 8.
33 Cited in Ashton, Little Germany, 25; Shadwell, A., “The German Colony in London,” National Review 26 (1986): 805Google Scholar.
34 See Birke, A. M., Brechtken, M., and Searle, A., eds., An Anglo–German Dialogue: The Munich Lectures on the History of International Relations (Munich, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
35 Davis, Victorians and Germany, 341–82.
36 Pall Mall Gazette, 23 August 1898.
37 “Royal Rhapsodies,” Figaro in London, 9 August 1834, 125.
38 “Her Majesty's Visit to Germany,” Morning Chronicle, 27 August 1845, 5; “Her Majesty's Visit to Germany,” Morning Chronicle, 28 August 1845, 5; “Christmas,” Liverpool Mercury, 17 December 1856, 3.
39 See Mayhew, H., German life and manners as seen in Saxony at the present day (London, 1864)Google Scholar; Pall Mall Gazette, 18 February 1871; Daily News, 2 May 1887, 5; “The German Domestic,” Hampshire Telegraph and Sussex Chronicle, 22 September 1888, 9; Leeds Mercury, 16 January 1890, 5; Reynolds's Weekly Newspaper, 18 November 1894, 2; “German Food,” Good Housekeeping (1896), 115.
40 Penny Illustrated Paper and Illustrated Times, 9 February 1889, 86; J. Hawthrone, “Saxon Studies,” Contemporary Review (December 1874): 561.
41 P. Panayi, “Anti-immigrant Violence in Nineteenth- and Twentieth-Century Britain,” in Racial Violence in Britain, 6, 10; East Ham Express, 3 May 1895.
42 Trewman's Exeter Flying Post; or, Plymouth and Cornish Advertiser, 19 June 1878, 6; “Vaterlanders,” Fun, 4 February 1871, 48.
43 Anderson, G., “German Clerks in England, 1870–1914,” in Hosts, Immigrants and Minorities: Historical Responses to Newcomers in British Society, 1870–1914, ed. Lunn, K. (Folkestone, 1980)Google Scholar.
44 Punch Library of Humour: Mr Punch's Cockney Humour, ed. Hammerton, J. A. (London, 1907), 52Google Scholar.
45 Hampshire Telegraph, 21 August 1886, 9.
46 Satirist, 18 October 1846, 333.
47 See, for example, “Anti-Sausage League,” Caledonian Mercury, 8 January 1864, 4; Liverpool Mercury, 9 January 1864, 5.
48 “League of Crowned Sausages,” Punch, 20 October 1855, 153.
49 “Anti-Sausage League,” Punch, 9 January 1864, 14.
50 See Davis, Victorians and Germany, 10, 359–71; Kennedy, P., The Rise of Anglo-German Antagonism, 1860–1914 (London, 1987)Google Scholar; Massie, R., Dreadnought: Britain, Germany and the Coming of the Great War (New York, 1991)Google Scholar; Rüger, J., The Great Naval Game: Britain and Germany in the Age of Empire (Cambridge, 2007)Google Scholar.
51 Russell, D., Popular Music in England, 1840–1914: A Social History (Manchester, 1997), 152–54Google Scholar; “The German Sausage and the Spanish Onion,” Punch, 19 September 1885.
52 “Germano-Africo Sausage Company Unlimited,” Fun, 20 August 1890.
53 See Caledonian Mercury, 8 January 1864, 4; “Our London Correspondent,” Liverpool Mercury, 11 July 1891, 5.
54 “Made in Germany,” Reynolds's Weekly Newspaper, 12 January 1896, 8; Pall Mall Gazette, 16 January 1896, 6.
55 Aberdeen Weekly Journal, 27 February 1896, 5.
56 Pall Mall Gazette, 23 August 1898.
57 Glasgow Herald, 6 June 1890, 9.
58 The Times, 22 May 1900; West Ham Guardian, 21 December 1901; Reinermann, “Fleet Street and the Kaiser,” 469–85.
59 Panayi, Enemy in Our Midst, 32–41; “The German Peril,” Quarterly Review (1908): 264–98Google Scholar.
60 Saki, When William Came (London, 1913)Google Scholar.
61 Howe, A., Free Trade and Liberal England, 1846–1946 (Oxford, 1997), 244–52Google Scholar. See, for example, “A Man of Qualities,” Manchester Courier, 28 September 1903; “Liberal Meeting at Brimscombe,” Gloucester Chronicle, 23 October 1903; Edinburgh Evening News, 12 December 1903, 3; Western Times, 28 January 1910, 14; Western Times, 27 August 1913, 2.
62 Cited in Trentmann, Free Trade Nation, 100.
63 Stibbe, M., German Anglophobia and the Great War, 1914–1918 (Cambridge, 2001), 209Google Scholar.
64 See, for example, Pall Mall Gazette, 16 September 1895; Lloyd's Weekly Newspaper, 22 November 1896, 12; Illustrated Police News, 25 March 1899, 10.
65 Standard, 16 September 1895, 6.
66 Essex Newsman, 11 July 1903.
67 “Foreign Clerks,” Birmingham Daily Post, 20 July 1887, 4.
68 “The Knackers' Yard,” Leeds Mercury, 4 March 1896, 11.
69 See Waddington, Bovine Scourge, for the expansion of meat inspection.
70 For the influence of food scares on food policy, see French, M. and Phillips, J., Cheated Not Poisoned? Food Regulation in the United Kingdom, 1875–1938 (Manchester, 2000), 66–95Google Scholar.
71 British Medical Journal 1 (1899): 1235Google Scholar.
72 “London Sausages,” Bury and Norwich Post, and Suffolk Herald, 22 August 1876, 3; “Adulterated German Sausages at Newport,” Western Mail, 8 November 1883, 4; British Medical Journal 1 (1881): 242Google Scholar.
73 “How Sausages Are Adulterated,” Food and Health, 24 August 1900, 13; Greenwood, J., Veiled Mysteries (London, 1883), 220Google Scholar; British Medical Journal 1 (1881): 242Google Scholar.
74 See Burnett, Plenty and Want; Stern, R., Home Economics: Domestic Fraud in Victorian England(Columbus, 2008)Google Scholar; French and Phillips, Cheated Not Poisoned?
75 For cases of sausages containing taboo meats, see, for example, Leicester Chronicle and the Leicestershire Mercury, 28 August 1869, 2; Birmingham Daily Post, 25 September 1882, 4; Pall Mall Gazette, 19 February 1886, 13; “You Never Sausage a Thing,” Funny Folks, 6 July 1889; Western Mail, 3 December 1892, 6; Evening Telegraph, 19 August 1901.
76 Pall Mall Gazette, 20 October 1865, 9; “Bad Meat and Sausages,” British Medical Journal 2 (1892)Google Scholar: 1059; Pall Mall Gazette, 4 August 1865, 9.
77 “Bread, Beef and Beer,” Reynolds's Weekly Newspaper, 1 April 1860, 7; “The Mysteries of Sausage Making,”Leeds Mercury, 28 May 1859, 6.
78 Birmingham Daily Post, 20 June 1882, 4; “Sausages,” Bristol Mercury, 20 January 1844, 6.
79 For a full discussion of the issue of diseased meat, see Waddington, Bovine Scourge.
80 Sanitary Record, 15 August 1889, 65; “Bad Meat Cases,” Sanitary Record, 15 August 1889, 91.
81 Walley, T., A Practical Guide to Meat Inspection (Edinburgh, 1890), 148Google Scholar.
82 See, for example, Glasgow Herald, 14 March 1864, 4; Birmingham Daily Post, 20 February 1889, 8; “Why Tinned Goods Are Dangerous,” Birmingham Daily Post, 29 November 1892, 6.
83 “The New Disease,” Glasgow Herald, 27 January 1864, 3; “Flesh-Worm Disease,” Once a Week, April 1866, 385; “A Horrible Story,” Trewman's Exeter Flying Post; or, Plymouth and Cornish Advertiser, 13 December 1865, 3.
84 Journal of the Royal Agricultural Society of England 3 (1892): 121Google Scholar; “Relation between Human and Animal Tuberculosis,” Lancet 2 (1902): 1277Google Scholar; Newman, “Administrative Control of Food,” 66–86; Littlejohn, A. R., Meat and Its Inspection (London, 1911), 190–91Google Scholar.
85 “Honour Was left Unsatisfied,” Chums, 8 July 1896, 725.
86 C. Goschler, “‘Wahrheit’ zwischen Seziersaal und Parlament: Rudolf Virchow und der kulturelle Deutungsanspruch der Naturwissenschaften,” Geschichte und Gesellschaft 30. Jahrg., H. 2, Neue Wege der Wissenschaftsgeschichte (April–June 2004): 244–45.
87 “Cheap Sausages,” Liverpool Mercury, 12 March 1873, 7.
88 Hardy, A., “Food, Hygiene, and the Laboratory: A Short History of Food Poisoning in Britain, circa 1850–1950,” Social History of Medicine 12 (1999): 296CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
89 “How Sausages Are Adulterated,” Food and Health, 24 August 1900, 13; Glasgow Herald, 14 March 1864, 4; “Police Intelligence,” Lloyd's Weekly Newspaper, 30 August 1868, 5; Pall Mall Gazette, 23 November 1870, 6; Birmingham Daily Post, 24 November 1870, 4; “Horrible Disclosure of the Sausage Trade,” Blackburn Standard, 19 July 1879, 3; Wylde, W., The Inspection of Meat: A Guide and Instruction Book to Officers Supervising Contract-meat and to All Sanitary Inspectors (London, 1890), 2Google Scholar.
90 “The Manufacture and Adulteration of Sausages,” Public Health 12 (1900): 636Google Scholar.
91 “A German Sausage Factory in London,” Glasgow Herald, 23 September 1882, 5.
92 “Cattle Road to Ruin,” Household Words, June 1850, 328.
93 Greenwood, Veiled Mysteries, 214.
94 “Beware of Sausages,” Illustrated Chips, 2 July 1898, 8; Newman, “Administrative Control of Food,” 77.
95 Derby Mercury, 28 August 1872, 4.
96 “Wares of Autolycus,” Pall Mall Gazette, 4 November 1893, 5.
97 “A Month in a German Hospital,” Daily News, 28 August 1890, 6; “Wares of Autolycus,” Pall Mall Gazette, 4 November 1893, 5.
98 Panayi, German Immigrants in Britain, 115–16.
99 “Knicknacks,” Fun, March 1885, 93; London Journal, February 1870, 144; “Wares of Autolycus,” Pall Mall Gazette, 5.
100 Pall Mall Gazette, 18 January 1900.
101 Preston Guardian, 28 July 1877.
102 See, for example, “‘Slink’ Butchers,” Lloyd's Weekly Newspaper, 16 March 1856, 3; “Manufacturing Diseased Horse Flesh into Sausages,” Leeds Mercury, 9 October 1869, 1; “Gleanings,” Birmingham Daily Post, 29 April 1880, 6; “German Sausage Trade,” Glasgow Herald, 27 August 1881, 7; Pall Mall Gazette, 23 September 1882, 3; “German Sausages,” Lloyd's Weekly Newspaper, 13 May 1883; “Our ‘Export’ of Old Horses,” Aberdeen Weekly Journal, 27 November 1894, 4; Pall Mall Gazette, 21 December 1900, 7.
103 Judy, 4 October 1882, 157.
104 Trentmann, Free Trade Nation, 80–100; “Tariff Reform,” Western Times, 26 April 1909.
105 Lancet 1 (1881): 988Google Scholar; British Medical Journal 2 (1864): 171Google Scholar; “Putrid Meats,” Leeds Mercury, 29 September 1868, 3; Western Times, 9 August 1904. For a broader discussion of food poisoning, see Hardy, “Food, Hygiene, and the Laboratory,” 293–311.
106 W. Ellis, “Our Peck of Diet,” Once a Week, April 1860, 396.
107 “Secrets of the Cook Shop,” Manchester Times, 6 January 1849.
108 “The Mysteries of Sausage Making,” Liverpool Mercury, 2 December 1842, 393.
109 Leeds Mercury, 5 March 1881, 7; Lincolnshire Chronicle, 20 November 1903, 6. For further cases, see Bell's Life in London and Sporting Chronicle, 5 August 1865, 2; Tomahawk, 12 September 1868, 105; Liverpool Mercury, 26 July 1877, 6; Preston Guardian, 28 July 1877, 4; “Large Seizure of Disease Meat,” Birmingham Daily Post, 15 June 1878, 6; “A German Sausage-maker Heavily Fined,” Western Mail, 17 July 1879, 3.
110 Quarterly Review (September 1850): 478.
111 Michael, W. H., “Case of Fatal Poisoning by German Sausage,” British Medical Journal 3 (1855): 762Google Scholar; Glasgow Herald, 14 March 1864, 4.
112 “Flesh-Worm Disease,” Once a Week, April 1866, 386.
113 Panayi, P., “German Immigrants in Britain, 1815–1914,” in Germans in Britain Since 1500, ed. Panayi, P. (London, 1996), 89–91Google Scholar.
114 Lancet 2 (1873): 466Google Scholar.
115 Pall Mall Gazette, 28 February 1880, 6; Pall Mall Gazette, 27 August 1881, 6; Lloyd's Weekly Newspaper, 27 May 1883, 7; Pall Mall Gazette, 17 December 1887, 6; “Summer Sausages,” Lloyd's Weekly Newspaper, 28 September 1890, 16; Pall Mall Gazette, 1 September 1900, 4.
116 Birmingham Daily Post, 23 November 1881, 4; “The Fall of the Sausage,” Judy, 5 October 1881.
117 Pall Mall Gazette, 29 July 1879, 10.
118 “Bad Meat and Light Punishment,” Liverpool Mercury, 17 July 1879, 6; Leeds Mercury, 2 August 1883, 5.
119 “As Others See Us,” All the Year Round, 3 November 1883, 487.
120 “Here's a Nice Little Appetitious Trifle!” Fun, November 1882, 192.
121 Preston Guardian, 28 July 1877, 4.
122 See, for example, “Summer Sausages,” Lloyd's Weekly Newspaper, 28 September 1890, 16; Leeds Mercury, 29 May 1896, 5; Pall Mall Gazette, 1 September 1900, 4; Lincolnshire Chronicle, 20 November 1903, 6.
123 Sunderland Daily Echo, 24 August 1901.
124 See Yoder, J. A., Upton Sinclair (New York, 1975)Google Scholar; Harvey, J., Pure Food: Securing the Federal Food and Drugs Act of 1906 (Princeton, 1989), 233–51Google Scholar; French and Phillips, Cheated Not Poisoned? 87–92.
125 C. Osbourne, “The Naval Exhibition” (1891).
126 See, for example, “Bad Meat and Light Punishment,” Liverpool Mercury, 17 July 1879, 6.
127 See, for example, Birmingham Daily Post, 5 September 1871, 4.
128 See Waddington, “The Dangerous Sausage,” 50–71.
- 14
- Cited by