Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-747cfc64b6-xl4lj Total loading time: 0.222 Render date: 2021-06-13T01:11:48.777Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

Britishness and Otherness: An Argument

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2014


There is no more effective way of bonding together the disparate sections of restless peoples than to unite them against outsiders. [E. J. Hobsbawm, Nations and Nationalism since 1780 (Cambridge, 1990), p. 91]

Britain is an invented nation, not so much older than the United States. [Peter Scott, Knowledge and Nation (Edinburgh, 1990), p. 168]

The morning of Saturday, September 14, 1793, was bitterly cold, and George Macartney, Viscount Macartney of Dervock in the county of Antrim, had been up since four o'clock, making final preparations for his audience with the emperor of China at his summer palace at Jehol, just north of the Great Wall. He stood waiting in the large, silken tent for over an hour before Ch'ien-lung eventually arrived, “seated in an open palanquin, carried by sixteen bearers, attended by numbers of officers bearing flags, standards, and umbrellas.” To the fury of the watching Chinese courtiers who had wanted him to execute the full kowtow (three separate kneelings and nine knockings of the head on the floor), Macartney went down on one knee only and presented the emperor with a letter from George III in a gold casket covered with diamonds. He followed this with other gifts—pottery, the best that Josiah Wedgwood's factory in Staffordshire could produce, a diving bell patented by the Anglo-Scottish engineer John Smeaton, sword blades from Birmingham, an orrery, a telescope, and some clocks.

Research Article
Copyright © North American Conference of British Studies 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.


1 Cranmer-Byng, J. L., ed., An Embassy to China: Being the Journal Kept by Lord Macartney during his Embassy to the Emperor Ch'ien-lung, 1793–1794 (London, 1962), p. 122Google Scholar.

2 Ibid., pp. 307–19; Cranmer-Byng, J. L., “China, 1792–94,” in Macartney of Lisanoure. 1737–1806: Essays in Biography, ed. Roebuck, Peter (Belfast, 1983), pp. 216–43Google Scholar.

3 Cranmer-Byng, , An Embassy to China, pp. 337–41Google Scholar.

4 Roebuck, pp. 239–40.

5 Anderson, Aeneas, A Narrative of the British Embassy to China (London, 1795), p. 143Google Scholar.

6 Sahlins, Peter, Boundaries: The Making of France and Spain (Berkeley, 1989), pp. 270–71Google Scholar.

7 Pocock, J. G. A., “The Limits and Divisions of British History: In Search of the Unknown Subject,” American Historical Review 87 (1982): 313CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and see his British History: A Plea for a New Subject,” Journal of Modern History 4 (1975): 601–24Google Scholar.

8 From a still rapidly expanding list, one could cite surveys such as Davies, R. R., Domination and Conquest: The Experience of Ireland, Scotland and Wales, 1100–1300 (Cambridge, 1990)Google Scholar; and Kearney, Hugh F., The British Isles: A History of Four Nations (Cambridge, 1989)Google Scholar; biographies such as Lee, Maurice, Great Britain's Solomon: James VI and I in His Three Kingdoms (Urbana, Ill., 1990)Google Scholar; and Hutton, Ronald, Charles the Second, King of England, Scotland and Ireland (Oxford, 1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and a recent textbook: Heyck, Thomas William and Lehmberg, Stanford E., The People of the British Isles: A New History, 3 vols. (Belmont, Calif. 1992)Google Scholar. See also the references in Clark, J. C. D., “English History's Forgotten Context: Scotland, Ireland, Wales,” Historical Journal 32 (1989): 211–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar. It is worth noting that, with some few exceptions, historians of modern Britain have thus far found the Four Nations framework far less attractive and useful than have their medieval and early modern colleagues.

9 British historians were slow to apply the insights on state formation supplied by historians of Continental Europe: see, e.g., Elliott's, J. H.Imperial Spain, 1469–1716 (London, 1963)Google Scholar, and his The Revolt of the Catalans (London, 1963)Google Scholar.

10 See Russell, Conrad, The Causes of the English Civil War (Oxford, 1990)Google Scholar, and his The Fall of the British Monarchies, 1637–1642 (Oxford, 1991)Google Scholar. Seeley was quoted by Samuel, Raphael in “In Search of Britain,” New Statesman and Society 25 (August 1989): 23Google Scholar.

11 For these trends, see Osmund, John, The Divided Kingdom (London, 1988)Google Scholar; Nairn, Tom, The Break-up of Britain: Crisis and Neo-nationatism (London, 1981)Google Scholar. As Robert Blake comments, there is a sense in which the Conservative party has always been the party of English nationalism: see his The Conservative Party from Peel to Churchill (London, 1970), p. 273Google Scholar.

12 I am aware that—as with all statements about the relationship between Britain and Ireland—this one is controversial.

13 For a full discussion of the points in this paragraph, see my Britons: Forging the Nation, 1707–1837 (New Haven, Conn., and London, 1992)Google Scholar.

14 Kearney, pp. 1–9 and passim.

15 See Jewell, Byron FrankThe Legislation relating to Scotland after the Forty-five” (Ph.D. diss., University of North Carolina, 1975)Google Scholar; Smith, Annette M., Jacobite Estates of the Forty-five (Edinburgh, 1982)Google Scholar; Durkacz, V. E., The Decline of the Celtic Languages: A Study of Linguistic and Cultural Conflict in Scotland, Wales and Ireland from the Reformation to the Twentieth Century (Edinburgh, 1983)Google Scholar.

16 Hechter, Pace Michael, Internal Colonialism: The Celtic Fringe in British National Development (Berkeley, 1975)Google Scholar. The unwisdom of treating either England on the one hand, or Scotland, Wales, and Ireland on the other, as though they were racially or culturally homogeneous is well set out in Kearney, passim. As far as England is concerned, Daniel Defoe made the same point very powerfully in The True-Born Englishman (London, 1701)Google Scholar.

17 Morgan, Kenneth O., Rebirth of a Nation: Wales, 1880–1980 (Oxford, 1981), p. 20Google Scholar. Two recent collections of essays that capture very well Scotland's considerable autonomy after 1707 as well as the degree to which it exhibited trends in common with its Southern neighbor are Houston, R. A. and Whyte, I. D., eds., Scottish Society, 1500–1800 (Cambridge, 1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Mason, Roger A., ed., Scotland and England, 1286–1815 (Edinburgh, 1987)Google Scholar.

18 For reasons that are well set out in Sahlins (n. 6 above), passim; and Hobsbawm, E. J., Nations and Nationalism since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality (Cambridge, 1990), pp. 145Google Scholar.

19 For England, see Bossy, John, The English Catholic Community, 1570–1850 (London, 1975)Google Scholar, an excellent survey that fails, however, to come to grips with the extent of Anti-Catholicism in this society.

20 Cressy, David, Bonfires and Bells: National Memory and the Protestant Calendar in Elizabethan and Stuart England (London, 1989)Google Scholar. Orthodox Presbyterian practice did not permit the Church of Scotland to keep calendrical feasts or fasts that were not demonstrably scriptural in their origin. It was able to participate in the special days of worship ordered by London on occasions of national thanksgiving, however, and seems to have done so enthusiastically alongside the Welsh and English churches. The forthcoming doctoral dissertation of my research student, James Caudle, will illumine the Britishwide impact of this state calendar of worship.

21 Scotland's Opposition to the Popish Bill: A Collection of all the Declarations and Resolutions (Edinburgh, 1780), pp. 337–38Google Scholar.

22 Jenkins, Geraint H., Literature, Religion and Society in Wales, 1660–1730 (Cardiff, 1978), p. 47Google Scholar.

23 In their eagerness to chronicle their country's resplendent Enlightenment, Scottish historians have neglected the very different and often singularly unenlightened ideas of the mass of Scotland's population in the 1700s and after. But see Donovan, Robert Kent, No Popery and Radicalism: Opposition to Roman Catholic Relief in Scotland, 1778–1782 (New York, 1987)Google Scholar.

24 See Haydon, Colin, “Anti-Catholicism in Eighteenth-Century England, c.1714–c.1780” (Ph.D. diss., Oxford University, 1985)Google Scholar.

25 Haller's, William dated but still valuable The Elect Nation: The Meaning and Relevance of Foxe's “Book of Martyrs” (New York, 1963)Google Scholar should be read alongside Firth, Katherine R., The Apocalyptic Tradition in Reformation Britain, 1530–1645 (Oxford, 1975)Google Scholar.

26 Foxe, John, The Book of Martyrs: Containing an Account of the Sufferings and Death of the Protestants in the Reign of Queen Mary the First (London, 1732)Google Scholar, preface.

27 I discuss these points in greater detail in Britons (n. 13 above).

28 Scotland' Opposition to the Popish Bill, p. 191.

29 Teague, John and Teague, Dorothea, “Where Duty Calls Me”: The Experiences of William Green of Lutterworth in the Napoleonic Wars (West Wickham, 1975), p. 47Google Scholar.

30 Haydon, p. 55.

31 See Callahan, William J. and Higgs, David, eds., Church and Society in Catholic Europe of the Eighteenth Century (Cambridge, 1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, passim.

32 Black, Jeremy, “The Catholic Threat and the British Press in the 1720s and 1730s,” Journal of Religious History 12 (1983): 364–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

33 Chandler, Samuel, Plain Reasons for being a Protestant (London, 1735), pp. 6364Google Scholar. The most balanced survey of the Jacobite threat after 1688 is Lenman, Bruce, The Jacobite Risings in Britain, 1689–1746 (London, 1980)Google Scholar.

34 See Cunningham, Hugh, The Volunteer Force (London, 1975)Google Scholar; Bourne, Kenneth, The Foreign Policy of Victorian England (London, 1970)Google Scholar.

35 Newman, Gerald, The Rise of English Nationalism: A Cultural History, 1740–1830 (London, 1987)Google Scholar.

36 Brewer, John, The Sinews of Power: War, Money and the English State, 1688–1783 (London, 1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

37 Bayly, C. A., Imperial Meridian: The British Empire and the World, 1780–1830 (London, 1989), p. 3Google Scholar.

38 I discuss these points in more detail in Britons (n. 13 above).

39 Quoted in Dawson, Warren R., The Nelson Collection at Lloyd's (London, 1932), pp. 450–51Google Scholar.

40 This is beginning to happen. See, e.g., Rodger, N. A. M., The Wooden World: An Anatomy of the Georgian Navy (London, 1986)Google Scholar; Steppler, G. A., “The Common Soldier in the Reign of George III, 1760–1793” (D.Phil, diss., Oxford University, 1984)Google Scholar.

41 Tibbie, J. W. and Tibbie, Anne, eds., The Prose of John Clare (London, 1951), p. 47Google Scholar.

42 Personal communication, Professor Kathleen Wilson, State University of New York at Stony Brook, 1989.

43 See Fischer, David Hackett, Albion's Seed: Four British Folkways in America (Oxford, 1989)Google Scholar.

44 See Bayly, passim; Cain, Alex M., The Cornchest for Scotland: Scots in India (Edinburgh, 1986)Google Scholar; Ingram, E., ed., Two Views of British India: The Private Correspondence of Mr. Dundas and Lord Wellesley, 1798–1801 (Bath, 1970)Google Scholar.

45 Said, Edward, Orientalism (New York, 1978), pp. 12Google Scholar.

46 Ibid., pp. 33–34.

47 This is a rich vein of inquiry that historians, as distinct from students of English literature, have barely begun to mine. But see Taube, Samuel R., “British Fiction and the British Empire, 1830–1880” (Ph.D. diss., State University of New York at Stony Brook, 1979)Google Scholar; Suleri, Sara, The Rhetoric of English India (Chicago, 1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bratton, J. S., Acts of Supremacy: The British Empire and the Stage, 1790–1930 (Manchester, 1991)Google Scholar; MacKenzie, John M., ed., Imperialism and Popular Culture (Manchester, 1986)Google Scholar; Mangan, J. A., ed., “Benefits Bestowed”: Education and British Imperialism (Manchester, 1988)Google Scholar. For a typical piece of imperialism for the young, see Miles, Alfred H., Fifty-two Stories of the British Empire (London, 1897)Google Scholar.

48 Beith, John Hay, The Oppressed English (New York, 1917), p. 30Google Scholar.

49 Osmund, John, “Wales in the 1980s,” in Nations without a State: Ethnic Minorities in Western Europe, ed. Forster, Charles R. (New York, 1980), p. 44Google Scholar.

50 Reader, W. J., At Duty's Call: A Study in Obsolete Patriotism (Manchester, 1988)Google Scholar.

51 See, e.g., Elliott, Marianne, Partners in Revolution: The United Irishmen and France (New Haven, Conn., 1982)Google Scholar.

52 See Cook, Scott B., “The Example of Ireland: Political and Administrative Aspects of the Imperial Relationship with British India, 1855–1922” (Ph.D. diss., Rutgers—The State University, 1987)Google Scholar.

53 Pocock, , “The Limits and Divisions of British History” (n. 7 above), p. 333Google Scholar.

54 Quoted in Osmund, p. 44.

Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Britishness and Otherness: An Argument
Available formats

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Britishness and Otherness: An Argument
Available formats

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Britishness and Otherness: An Argument
Available formats

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *