Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T12:07:25.700Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Social and psychological aspects of extra-marital first conceptions*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

J. F. Pearson
Affiliation:
Department of Social Psychology, London School of Economics

Summary

A controlled comparison study was completed using interview data from 80 women each experiencing their first pregnancy whilst single. Half of the women continued their pregnancy, in some cases marrying the father. The other half obtained an abortion. Two interviewers, one male and the other female, each completed an equal number of interviews with both groups of women.

The women selected for the study had the following traits: (1) never married before this, their first conception; (2) aged 17–30 years; (3) white ethnic status; (4) had not delivered or terminated the pregnancy at the time of the interview. The sample consisted of volunteers from the ante-natal and gynaecology clinics at St Mary's Hospital Medical School and Samaritan Hospital for Women, London, W.2, and Kingston and Richmond Hospitals, Surrey.

Almost all topics examined in the pre-conception period turned out to be characteristic of women experiencing their first illegitimate conception, whether or not they continued the pregnancy. A detailed examination of contraceptive background revealed no significant differences between the two groups of women, with two exceptions. Women having abortions were more likely, at the time before they conceived, to have accepted the idea of using contraception. A small number of these women were also more likely to have made an effort to obtain a clinical contraceptive device.

The only other pre-conception factor found to be associated with abortion involved the relationship with the father up to the time of conception. If that relationship was uncertain, less meaningful than previous ones, or a social rather than a romantic one, the woman was more likely to terminate the pregnancy.

In contrast to the pre-conception period, almost all analyses of events subsequent to conception revealed differences between the two groups of women. Both concern over being discredited by other people and concealing information about the pregnancy were traits associated with having an abortion, but in a qualitative rather than an absolute sense. These aspects of social stigma were common to all women before the first pregnancy test, but became more evident amongst women having abortions once the pregnancy had been clinically confirmed. Both concern over being discredited and concealing the pregnancy were experienced in relation to particular persons. For women terminating their pregnancies these were usually their parents.

The degree of acceptability of abortion and unmarried motherhood differed between the groups, but they were similar in their views on the acceptability of marriage with pregnancy and adoption. These four alternatives were further examined in terms of the women's preferences and here the two groups differed.

Finally, there were differences between the groups in the effect of the pregnancy on the relationship with the putative father. Women having abortions were more likely to find themselves in a relationship that had either finished or was likely to finish after the father knew of the pregnancy. Some were pregnant by a social acquaintance which precluded either marriage or joint parenthood.

The findings are discussed in terms of the relationship between contraception and abortion for the single woman and consideration is given to the implications for fertility research and contraceptive and pregnancy services.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. (1972) Pregnancy risk paradox. Doctor, Vol. 2, No. 3.Google Scholar
Ashdown-Sharp, P. (1972) The engagement pill. Sunday Times, February 22nd, 1972.Google Scholar
Birch, J. (1971) Extra-marital pregnancy. Social Work Today, 2, No. 16, 9.Google Scholar
Bpas (1971) Socio-medical Breakdown and Report. Birmingham Pregnancy Advisory Service.Google Scholar
Brown, G.W. & Rutter, M. (1966) The measurement of family activities and relationships: a methodological study. Human Relations, 19, 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, N.R. & Bonham, D.G. (1963) Perinatal Mortality. Livingstone, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Cannel, C.F. & Kahn, R.L. (1968) Interviewing. In: The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. II, p 526. Edited by Lindzey, G. & Aronson, E.. Addison-Wesley, London.Google Scholar
Cartwright, A. (1970) Parents and Family Planning Services. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Cartwright, A. & Waite, M. (1972) General practitioners and abortion. Evidence to the Committee on the working of the Abortion Act. J. Roy. Coll. gen. Practitnrs, Supplement No. 1, Vol. 2.Google Scholar
Chalmers, I. & Anderson, A. (1972) Factors affecting gestational age at therapeutic abortion. Lancet, i, 1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Departmental Committee on the Adoption of Children (1970) Adoption of Children. Provisional proposals of the Committee appointed by the Secretary of State for the Home Office and the Secretary of State for Scotland. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Farmer, C. (1971) Mechanism of selection and decision-making in therapeutic abortion. J. biosoc. Sci. 3, 121.Google ScholarPubMed
Goffman, I. (1968) Stigma. Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middlesex.Google Scholar
Hardin, G. (1968) Abortion—or compulsory pregnancy? J. Marr. & Family, 30, 246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Illsley, R. & Gill, D.G. (1968) Changing trends in illegitimacy. Soc. Sci. & Med. 2, 415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ingham, C. & Simms, M. (1972) Follow-up study of 155 applicants for abortion at the Royal Northern Hospital, London. J. biosoc. Sci. 4, 351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jourard, S.M. (1971) Self-disclosure: an Experimental Analysis of the Transparent Self. Wiley & Sons, London.Google Scholar
Lambert, J. (1971) Survey of 3,000 unwanted pregnancies. Br. med. J. iv, 156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, J.F. (1971) Pilot study of single women requesting a legal abortion. J. biosoc. Sci. 3, 417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pohlman, E. (1969) Psychology of Birth Planning. Schenkman, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Rainwater, L. (1965) Family Design: Marital Sexuality, Family Size and Contraception. Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
Registra General (1966) Classification of Occupations. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Registra General (1967) Statistical Review of England and Wales for 1964. Part III, Commentary, p. 63. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Registra General (1970) Statistical Review of England and Wales for 1968, Supplement on Abortion. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Registra General (1971) Statistical Review of England and Wales for 1969, Supplement on Abortion. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Registra General (1972) Statistical Review of England and Wales for 1970, Supplement on Abortion. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (1972) Unplanned Pregnancy. 27 Sussex Place, London.Google Scholar
Sagi, P.C., Potter, R.G. & Westoff, C.F. (1962) Contraceptive effectiveness as a function of desired family size. Popul. Stud. 15, 291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Select Committee on Science and Technology (1971) Population of the United Kingdom. First Report, Session 1970–1971. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Sood, S.V. (1971) Some operative and post-operative hazards of legal termination of pregnancy. Br. med. J. iv, 270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stallworthy, J.A., Moolgaoker, AS. & Walsh, J.J. (1971) Legal abortion: a critical assessment of its risks. Lancet, ii, 1245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J.M. & Hindell, K. (1972) Abortion and Contraception: a Study of Patients' Attitudes. PEP Broadsheet 536, Vol. XXXVIII. PEP, London.Google Scholar
Wacc (1972) Women and Abortion. Woman's Abortion and Contraception Campaign's evidence to the Committee on the Working of the Abortion Act. WACC, London.Google Scholar