Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T09:22:52.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Declining fertility and increasing use of traditional methods of family planning: a paradox in Uttar Pradesh, India?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2022

Shiva S. Halli Open the ORCID record for Shiva S. Halli [Opens in a new window] ,
Mohd Tauheed Alam ,
Antony Joseph ,
Ravi Prakash ,
Shajy Isac ,
Marissa Becker ,
Preeti Anand ,
N. Vasanthakumar ,
B. M. Ramesh  and
James Blanchard
Shiva S. Halli*
Affiliation:
University of Manitoba, Canada
Mohd Tauheed Alam
Affiliation:
India Health Action Trust, India
Antony Joseph
Affiliation:
University of Manitoba, Canada
Ravi Prakash
Affiliation:
University of Manitoba, Canada
Shajy Isac
Affiliation:
University of Manitoba, Canada
Marissa Becker
Affiliation:
University of Manitoba, Canada
Preeti Anand
Affiliation:
University of Manitoba, Canada
N. Vasanthakumar
Affiliation:
University of Manitoba, Canada
B. M. Ramesh
Affiliation:
University of Manitoba, Canada
James Blanchard
Affiliation:
University of Manitoba, Canada
*
*Corresponding Author: Email: shiva.halli@umanitoba.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Uttar Pradesh (UP), with more than 220 million people, is the most populous state in India. Despite a high unmet need for modern family planning methods, the state has experienced a substantial decline in fertility. India has also seen a decline during this period which can be attributed to the increased prevalence of modern methods of family planning, particularly female sterilisation, but in UP, the corresponding increase was marginal. At the same time, Traditional Family Planning Methods (TMs) increased significantly in UP in contrast to India, where it was marginal. The trends in UP raise questions about the drivers in fertility decline and question the conventional wisdom that fertility declines are driven by modern methods, and the paper aims to understand this paradox. Fertility trends and family planning practices in UP were analysed using data from different rounds of National Family Health Surveys (NFHS) and the two UP Family Planning Surveys conducted by the UP Technical Support Unit to understand whether the use of TMs played a role in the fertility decline. As per NFHS-4, the prevalence of TM in India (6%) was less than half that of UP (13%). The UP Family Planning Survey in 25 High Priority Districts estimated that 22% of women used TMs. The analysis also suggested that availability and accessibiility of modern contraceptives might have played a role in the increased use of TMs in UP. If there are still couples who make a choice in favour of TMs, they should be well informed about the risks associated with the use of traditional methods as higher failure rate is observed among TMs users.

Keywords

Traditional Family Planning MethodsTotal Fertility RateUttar Pradesh
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 55 , Issue 2 , March 2023 , pp. 224 - 237
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bansal, A., Dwivedi, L.K. (2020) Sterilization regret in India: Is quality of care a matter of concern?. Contracept Reprod Med 5, 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-020-00115-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basu, A. (2002). Postmodern contraception: the rise of traditional methods of birth control among upper class women in India. In: Bledsoe C, editor. Discovering normality in health and the reproductive body. PAS working Papers no. 11. Illinois: Program of African Studies, North-western University. pp. 71–81.Google Scholar
Bombay: IIPS. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) (1995). National Family Health Survey (NFHI-1), 1992-93.Google Scholar
Bongaarts, J and Bruce, J (1995). The causes of unmet need for contraception and the social content of services. Studies in Family Planning. 26: 57–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cates, W. Jr., Stanback, J. and Maggwa, B. (2014). Global family planning metrics – time for new definitions? Contraception. 90:472–475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, HI and Toros, A (1994). The use of traditional methods of contraception among Turkish couples. Studies in Family Planning. 25:122–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gribaldo, A, Judd, MD, Kertzer, DI (2009). An “imperfect” Contraceptive Society: Fertility and Contraception in Italy. Population and Development Review. 35:551–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halli, S.S., Ashwini, D, Dehury, B, Isac, S, Joseph, A, Anand, P, Gothalwal, V, Prakash, R, Ramesh, BM, Blanchard, J and Boerma, T (2019). Fertility and family planning in Uttar Pradesh, India: major progress and persistent gaps. Reproductive Health. 16, doi:10.1186/s12978-019-0790-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ORC Macro (2000). National Family Health Survey (NFHS-2), India 1998-99. Mumbai: IIPS.Google Scholar
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Macro International (2007). National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005-06: India. Mumbai: IIPS.Google Scholar
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) (2010 ). District Level Household and Facility Survey (DLHS-3), 2007-08: India. Mumbai: IIPS.Google Scholar
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) (2017). National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4), India, 2015-16: India. Mumbai: IIPS.Google Scholar
Institute for Reproductive Health, Georgetown University (2015). The Standard Days Method: a new effective method of family planning. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University. http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNADG759.Google Scholar
Jennings, V and Gribble, J (2003). The Standard Days Method: an innovative approach to family planning. Global Health Link. 12-3.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, M.S., Bryman, A. and Futing-Liao, T. (2004). Sage Encyclopedia of Social Science research Methods (Vols. 1-0). Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage Publications, Inc. doi: 10.4135/9781412950589 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Rural Health Mission (2013). Guidance Note for implementation of RMNCH+A interventions in High Priority Districts. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi: Government of India.Google Scholar
Pradhan, M R and Dwivedi, L.K. (2019). Changes in Contraceptive Use and Method Mix in India: 1992–92 to 2015–16. Sexual & Reproductive Health Care. 49:56–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramanathan, M., & Mishra, U. (2000). Correlates of female sterilization regret in the southern states of India. Journal of Biosocial Science, 32(4), 547–558. doi: 10.1017/S0021932000005472 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faujdar, Ram, Chandrashekhar and Biswabandita Chowdhary (2014). Use of traditional contraceptive methods in India & its socio-demographic determinants. Indian Journal of Medical Research, November. 140 (Suppl 1): S17–S28 Google Scholar
Clementine, Rossier and Corker, Jamaica (2017). Contemporary use of traditional Contraception in Sub Saharan Africa, Population Development Review. 43 (Suppl 1): 192–215 Google Scholar
Rossier, C., Senderowicz, L. and Soura, A. (2014). Do natural methods count? Underreporting of natural contraception in urban Burkina Faso. Studies in Family Planning. 14(2): 171–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoumaker, B (2013). A Stata module for computing fertility rates and TFRs from birth histories. 419 Demographic Research. 28(May):1093–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stateveig, S. (2017). Fear, opposition, ambivalence, and omission: Results from a follow-up study on unmet need for family planning in Ghana. PloS ONE 12 (7); E0182076. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.01820767 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sample Registration System (SRS) Bulletins (1971-2016), Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India. Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India.Google Scholar
Susheela Singh, Rubina Hussain, Chander Shekhar, Rajib Acharya, Moore, Ann M., Melissa Stillman, Jennifer J. Frost, Harihar Sahoo, Manoj Alagarajan, Aparna Sundaram, Kalyanwala, Shveta and Ball, Haley (2018). Abortion and Unintended Pregnancy in Six Indian States: Findings and Implications for Policies and Programs, New York: Guttmacher Institute. https://doi.org/10.1363/2018.30009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsui, AO, de Silva, SV and Marinshaw, R (1991). Pregnancy avoidance and coital behavior. Demography. 28:101–17Google ScholarPubMed
Uttar Pradesh Technical Support Unit (2017). District Level Family Planning Survey, 2016, 25 High Priority Districts. Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, June.Google Scholar
Uttar Pradesh Technical Support Unit (2018). Facility Mapping Survey for Strengthening Family Planning Services in 421 Uttar Pradesh. Lucknow. 2018 (Unpublished)Google Scholar