Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
KIRSCH, A. THOMAS
1985.
text and context: Buddhist sex roles/culture of gender revisited.
American Ethnologist,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 2,
p.
302.
Reynolds, Craig J.
1986.
The author‐function and Thai history.
Asian Studies Association of Australia. Review,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 1,
p.
22.
Doner, Richard F.
1991.
Approaches to the Politics of Economic Growth in Southeast Asia.
The Journal of Asian Studies,
Vol. 50,
Issue. 4,
p.
818.
Bowie, Katherine A.
1992.
Unraveling the Myth of the Subsistence Economy: Textile Production in Nineteenth-Century Northern Thailand.
The Journal of Asian Studies,
Vol. 51,
Issue. 4,
p.
797.
Tannenbaum, Nicola
1993.
Galactic Polities, the Asiatic Mode of Production and Peasant‐States: Southeast Asian Pre‐Modern Polities.
The Australian Journal of Anthropology,
Vol. 4,
Issue. 1,
p.
45.
SUGIYAMA, SHOKO
1997.
A Study on ‘Khwam Khithen (Opinion)’ During Siam Revolution in 1932.
Southeast Asia: History and Culture,
Vol. 1997,
Issue. 26,
p.
88.
Lysa, Hong
1998.
Of Consorts and Harlots in Thai Popular History.
The Journal of Asian Studies,
Vol. 57,
Issue. 2,
p.
333.
Junko, Koizumi
2002.
King's Manpower Constructed: Writing the History of the Conscription of Labour in Siam.
South East Asia Research,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 1,
p.
31.
Delcore, Henry D.
2003.
Nongovernmental organizations and the work of memory in northern Thailand.
American Ethnologist,
Vol. 30,
Issue. 1,
p.
61.
Jackson, Peter A.
2004.
The Tapestry of Language and Theory.
South East Asia Research,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 3,
p.
337.
Jackson, Peter A.
2005.
Semicoloniality, Translation and Excess in Thai Cultural Studies.
South East Asia Research,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 1,
p.
7.
Jackson, Peter A.
2007.
Autonomy and subordination in Thai history: the case for semicolonial analysis.
Inter-Asia Cultural Studies,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 3,
p.
329.
Constable, Philip
and
Kuasirikun, Nooch
2007.
Accounting for the nation‐state in mid nineteenth‐century Thailand.
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 4,
p.
574.
Mitchell, James
2009.
Sorapet Pinyoo and the status ofpleeng luuk tung.
Journal of Southeast Asian Studies,
Vol. 40,
Issue. 2,
p.
295.
Basham, Richard
2009.
‘False Consciousness’ and the Problem of Merit and Power in Thailand.
Mankind,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
126.
Kuasirikun, Nooch
and
Constable, Philip
2010.
The cosmology of accounting in mid 19th-century Thailand.
Accounting, Organizations and Society,
Vol. 35,
Issue. 6,
p.
596.
Kogen, Lauren
2010.
Savage deregulation in Thailand: expanding Hallin and Mancini’s European model.
Media, Culture & Society,
Vol. 32,
Issue. 2,
p.
335.
Tan, Michelle
2012.
Passing over in silences: Ideology, ideals and ideas in Thai translation.
Journal of Southeast Asian Studies,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 1,
p.
32.
Veal, Clare
2013.
The Charismatic Index: Photographic Representations of Power and Status in the Thai Social Order.
Trans Asia Photography,
Vol. 3,
Issue. 2,
Dayley, Robert
and
Sattayanurak, Attachak
2016.
Thailand's last peasant.
Journal of Southeast Asian Studies,
Vol. 47,
Issue. 1,
p.
42.