Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T11:58:31.278Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Parochial Ecology on St Briavels Common: Rebalancing the Local and the Universal in Anglican Ecclesiology and Practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2011

Michael S. Northcott
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The rise of the global market economy has advanced forms of centrist, corporatist and statist rule that are insensitive to local indicators that this novel social order is ecologically, and socially, unsustainable. For many political theologians, and for secular political ecologists, the related crises of species extinction and climate change, combined with structural economic crisis, require a fundamental relocalization of the global economy and of the harvesting of natural resources. The contest between the political economy of global ‘free’ trade and a relocalized economy and polity bears analogies with debates around the relation between the local and the universal in Christian ecclesiology. In the eucharistic body politics of Saint Paul Christian communion is focused in the eucharistic gathering. However, centrist tendencies in ecclesiastical polity emerged in fourth-century accounts of the universal church. The subsequent doctrine of the primacy of Peter gave a powerful push to centrist over localist accounts of the esse of the Church in the West, and the contest between local and universal in Anglican and Catholic ecclesiologies continues to this day. Orthodox theologians Zizioulas and Afanassieff, describe and fill out the doctrinal implications of a primitive ecclesiology in which ‘the eucharist makes the church’.2 This recovery of a local eucharistic ecclesiology offers valuable resources for thinking about the nature of communion between Anglicans in a Communion increasingly riven by controversy, and for thinking about the nature of the parish in a Church of England prone in the last forty years to centrist and managerial conceptions of the Church, and to the denigration of the local parish church as the esse of the ministry and mission of the Church in England.

Keywords

localuniversalecclesiologychurchEnglandparishplacecommonsecologypolitycovenant
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Anglican Studies , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , 30 March 2012 , pp. 68 - 93
Copyright
Copyright © The Journal of Anglican Studies Trust 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1.

Michael S. Northcott is Professor of Ethics in the School of Divinity, University of Edinburgh, and a Priest in the Scottish Episcopal Church.

References

2. McPartlan, Paul, The Eucharist Makes the Church: Henri de Lubac and John Zizioulas in Dialogue (Edinburgh: T. and T. Clark, 1998).Google Scholar

3. Leakey, RichardLewin, Roger, The Sixth Extinction: Patterns of Life and the Future of Humankind (New York: Doubleday, 1995).Google Scholar

4. Lovegrove, Roger, Silent Fields: The Long Decline of a Nation's Wildlife (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar; see also Norman Maclean (ed.), Silent Summer (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009)Google Scholar.

5. See further Northcott, Michael S., ‘The World Trade Organisation, Fair Trade and the Body Politics of Saint Paul’, in John Atherton (ed.), Through the Eye of a Needle: Theology, Ethics and Economy (London: Epworth Press, 2007), pp. 169–188.Google Scholar

6. Northcott, Michael S., The Environment and Christian Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7. For an influential series of essays by first- and third-world scholars on relocalization see Mander, JerryGoldsmith, Edward, (eds.), The Case against the Global Economy and for a Turn towards the Local (San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books, 1996)Google Scholar. See also Paul Hirst, Associative Democracy: New Forms of Economic and Social Governance (Cambridge, MA: University of Massachusetts Press, 1994)Google Scholar.

8. Northcott, Michael S., The Environment and Christian Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 262–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Michael S. Northcott, ‘From Environmental U-topianism to Parochial Ecology: Communities of Place and the Politics of Sustainability’, Ecotheology 7 (2000), pp. 71–85Google Scholar.

9. See further Northcott, , Environment and Christian Ethics, pp. 219–319.Google Scholar

10. Hart, C.E., ‘The Origin and the Geographical Extent of the Hundred of St Briavels in Gloucestershire’, Transactions of the Bristol and Gloucestershire Archaeological Society 66 (1945), pp. 138–165.Google Scholar

11. Clifford, E.M., ‘St Briavels’, Folklore 55 (1944), pp. 169–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12. Commons Act 2006 (London: HMSO, 2006).

13. See further Thompson, E.P., Customs in Common (London: Merlin Press, 1991).Google Scholar

14. For a fuller account see Tierney, Brian, The Idea of Natural Rights (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2001).Google Scholar

15. Coyle, SeanMorrow, Karen, The Philosophical Foundations of Environmental Law: Property, Rights and Nature (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004), p. 212.Google Scholar

16. O'Donovan, Joan Lockwood, ‘Natural Law and Perfect Community: Contributions of Christian Platonism to Political Theory’, Modern Theology 14 (1998), pp. 19–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17. O'Donovan, , ‘Natural Law and Perfect Community’, p. 33.Google Scholar

18. O'Donovan, , ‘Natural Law and Perfect Community’, p. 38.Google Scholar

19. Ostrom, Elinor, Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), p. 62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

20. Ostrom, , Governing the Commons, p. 64.Google Scholar

21. Frey, Bruno S.Stutzer, Alois, Happiness and Economics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002), pp. 144–145.Google Scholar

22. Frey and Stutzer, Happiness and Economics, p. 154.Google Scholar

23. MacIntyre, Alasdair, ‘Politics, Philosophy and the Common Good’, in Kelvin Knight (ed.), The MacIntyre Reader (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1998), pp. 235–252.Google Scholar

24. Hooker, Richard, Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity, Book VIII, 2.2 cited in Bruce Kaye, ‘Social Context and Theological Practice: Radical Orthodoxy and Richard Hooker’, Sewanee Theological Review 45.2 (2002), pp. 385–398.Google Scholar

25. Kaye, ‘Social Context and Theological Practice’. See also Kaye, Bruce, Introduction to World Anglicanism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

26. Northcott, Michael S., The Church and Secularisation: Urban Industrial Mission in Northeast England (Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 1990).Google Scholar

27. Ramsey, Ian, The Fourth R: Durham Report on Religious Education (London: SPCK, 1970).Google Scholar

28. Northcott, , Church and Secularisation, pp. 88–107.Google Scholar

29. See further Frei, Hans, The Eclipse of Biblical Narrative: A Study in Eighteenth and Nineteenth Century Hermeneutics (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1974).Google Scholar

30. The Church for Others: A Quest for Structures for Missionary Congregations/Final Report of the Western European Working Group and North American Working Group of the Department on Studies in Evangelism (Geneva: World Council of Churches Department on Studies in Evangelism, Western European Working Group, 1967).

31. For an incisive critique of these reforms see Roberts, Richard H., ‘Ruling the Body: The Care of Souls in a Managerial Church’, in Richard H. Roberts, Religion, Theology and the Human Sciences (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), pp. 161–189.Google Scholar

32. Rowan Revealed: A Wide-ranging Conversation with Canon John Young (York: Diocese of York, 2009). See also Williams, Rowan, ‘Introduction’, in The Archbishops Council, Mission Shaped Church: Church Planting and Fresh Expressions of Church in a Changing Context (London: Church House Publishing, 2004), pp. vii–viii.Google Scholar

33. See the excellent critique by Davison, AndrewMilbank, Alison, For the Parish? A Critique of Fresh Expressions (London: SCM Press, 2010).Google Scholar

34. Zizioulas, John, Eucharist, Bishop and Church: The Unity of the Church in the Divine Eucharist (Brookline, MT: Holy Orthodox Press, 2001).Google Scholar

35. Zizioulas, , Eucharist, Bishop and Church, pp. 90–91.Google Scholar

36. Zizioulas, , Eucharist, Bishop and Church, p. 93.Google Scholar

37. Epistle of Ignatius to the Ephesians 5.2-3, Roberts, A.Donaldson, R. (eds.), Anti-Nicene Fathers (Buffalo, CO: Christian Literature Publishing Co. 1885), pp. 45–49.Google Scholar

38. Zizioulas, , Eucharist, Bishop and Church, pp. 114–15.Google Scholar

39. Afanassieff, Nicolas, ‘The Church which Presides in Love’, in John Meyendorff (ed.), The Primacy of Peter: Essays in Ecclesiology and the Early Church (Yonkers, NY: St Vladimir's Seminary Press, 1992), pp. 91–144.Google Scholar

40. Afanassieff, , ‘The Church which Presides in Love’, p. 92.Google Scholar

41. Afanassieff, , ‘The Church which Presides in Love’, p. 107.Google Scholar

42. Zizioulas, , Eucharist, Bishop and Church, pp. 115–21.Google Scholar

43. Afanassieff, , ‘The Church which Presides in Love’, pp. 104–105.Google Scholar

44. Afanassieff, , ‘The Church which Presides in Love’, p. 107.Google Scholar

45. Afanassieff, , ‘The Church which Presides in Love’, p. 108–109.Google Scholar

46. Afanassieff, , ‘The Church which Presides in Love’, p. 110.Google Scholar

47. Afanassieff, , ‘The Church which Presides in Love’, p. 112.Google Scholar

48. See further Inge, John, A Christian Theology of Place: Explorations in Practical, Pastoral and Empirical Theology (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2003).Google Scholar

49. Kasper, Walter, ‘On the Church: A Friendly Reply to Cardinal Ratzinger’, The Furrow 52 (2001), pp. 323–332.Google Scholar

50. Ratzinger, Cardinal, ‘The Local and the Universal Church’, America: National Catholic Weekly 4 (2001), pp. 2–9.Google Scholar

51. See, for example, Benedict XVI's comments on the original universality of the Church Catholic from the first Pentecost in Benedict XVI, God Is Reason, God Is Will, God Is Love, God Is Beauty: Benedict XVI's Pentecost Homily (Rome: Vatican City, 2011).

52. See further Balasuriya, Tissa, The Eucharist and Human Liberation (London: SCM Press, 1977)Google Scholar, and Timothy Gorringe, The Sign of Love: Reflections on the Eucharist (London: SPCK, 1997)Google Scholar.

53. Ramsey, Michael, The Gospel and the Catholic Church (London: Longmans Green and Co. Ltd, 1935).Google Scholar

54. John Milbank makes a related argument for the significance of what he calls ‘complex space’ in the context of a political economy which is increasingly centrist, corporatist and statist: Milbank, ‘On complex space’ in Milbank, John, The Word Made Strange: Theory, Language, Culture (Oxford: Blackwell, 1997), pp. 268–292Google Scholar. I am grateful to John for his comments on an earlier version of this paper. For a related approach by an American Catholic theologian see Cavanaugh, William T., Theopolitical Imagination (London: T. and T. Clark, 2002)Google Scholar.

55. Afanassieff, , ‘The Church which Presides in Love’, p. 118.Google Scholar