Article contents
Handmade by Poverty: Worker Correspondence, Objectivist Poetics and the Pathos of the Readymade
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 August 2015
Abstract
Worker correspondence was a form of found poetry employed by radical left writers during the 1930s. Readers' letters to publications such as New Masses and the Daily Worker were reworked with end stops and presented as free verse. This essay examines the practice of worker correspondence as a form of readymade, a consciously avant-gardist collision of politics and “high” culture. This examination is put forward as a reflection on current thinking on the literary left of the Depression decade and – along the way – suggests points of contact with the Objectivist poetics of George Oppen, Louis Zukofsky and Charles Reznikoff.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press and British Association for American Studies 2015
References
1 Olsen, Tillie Lerner, “I Want You Women up North to Know,” The Partisan , 1, 4 (March 1934)Google Scholar, reprinted in Charlotte Nekola and Paula Rabinowitz, eds., Writing Red: An Anthology of American Women Writers, 1930–1940 (New York: Feminist Press, 1987), 179–181, 180, hereafter IWY.
2 John Roberts, The Intangibilities of Form: Skill and Deskilling in Art after the Readymade (London: Verso, 2007), 64.
3 Ibid., 68, 69.
4 Joseph Freeman, introduction to Granville Hicks, Michael Gold, Isidor Schneider, Joseph North, Paul Peters, and Alan Calmer, eds., Proletarian Literature in the United States: An Anthology (London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1935), 9–28, 15, emphasis in source.
5 Cary Nelson, Repression and Recovery: Modern American Poetry and the Politics of Cultural Memory, 1910–1945 (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1989), 105.
6 Zukofsky, Louis, “Sincerity and Objectification: With Special Reference to the Work of Charles Reznikoff,” Poetry , 37, 5 (Feb. 1931), 272–85Google Scholar, 280, 274.
7 Roberts, 49.
8 Joseph Harrington, Poetry and the Public: The Social Form of Modern U. S. Poetics (Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 2002).
9 Lawrence F. Hanley, unpublished introduction to Symbolic War: The Cultural Politics of Proletarian Literature, 1929–1935, available at http://hanley.wikispaces.com, accessed 15 Sept. 2014, cited with permission of the author. See also Hanley, “‘Smashing Cantatas’ and ‘Looking Glass Pitchers’: The Impossible Location of Proletarian Literature,” in Janet Galligani Casey, ed., The Novel and the American Left: Critical Essays on Depression-Era Fiction (Iowa City: University of Iowa Press, 2004), 132–50.
10 Ezra Pound, “Workshop Orchestration,” New Masses, 2, 5 (March 1927), 21.
11 Peck, David, “The Tradition of American Revolutionary Literature: The Monthly New Masses, 1926–1933,” Science and Society , 42, 4 (Winter 1978–79), 385–409 Google Scholar, 386.
12 Barbara Foley, Radical Representations: Politics and Form in U. S. Proletarian Fiction, 1929–1941 (Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press, 1993); Cary Nelson, Revolutionary Memory: Recovering the Poetry of the American Left (New York: Routledge, 2001); Walter Kalaidjian, American Culture between the Wars: Revisionary Modernism & Postmodern Critique (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993); Paula Rabinowitz, Labor and Desire: Women's Revolutionary Fiction in Depression America (Chapel Hill and London: University of North Carolina Press, 1991).
13 Walter Kalaidjian, introduction to Kalaidjian, ed., The Cambridge Companion to American Modernism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), 1–11, 3; Paula Rabinowitz, “Social Representations within American Modernism,” in ibid., 261–83, 266.
14 John Lowney, History, Memory, and the Literary Left: Modern American Poetry, 1935–1968 (Iowa City: University of Iowa Press, 2006), 13.
15 Gold, Michael, “Loud Speaker and Other Essays,” New Masses , 2, 5 (March 1927), 5–6 Google Scholar.
16 Ezra Pound, “Machine Art,” in Pound, Machine Art and Other Writings: The Lost Thought of the Italian Years, ed. Maria Luisa Ardizzone (Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press, 1996), 57–83, 76.
17 Gold, Michael, “Go Left, Young Writers!”, New Masses , 4, 8 (Jan. 1929), 3–4 Google Scholar, 4.
18 Rabinowitz, Labor and Desire, 53.
19 Kalaidjian, American Culture between the Wars, 138; Tillie Olsen, Silences (New York: Delacorte Press, 1978), 39; Douglas Wixson, Worker–Writer in America: Jack Conroy and the Tradition of Midwestern Literary Radicalism 1898–1990 (Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1994), 211.
20 Karl Marx, “Critique of the Gotha Programme,” in Marx: Later Political Writings, ed. Terrell Carver (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 208–26, 214.
21 Jeff Allred, American Modernism and Depression Documentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), 40, 41.
22 Michael Gold, “Workers' Correspondence,” Daily Worker, 20 Jan. 1934, 9, hereafter WC.
23 “Worker Correspondence,” Daily Worker, 31 Jan. 1933, 3.
24 Harry Braverman, Labor and Monopoly Capital (New York and London: Monthly Review Press, 1974), 281.
25 An editorial note in the Daily Worker, 22 Aug. 1934, 5, states that Potamkin “was the first to use Workers' Correspondence as themes for poetry.” Nelson, Repression and Recovery, 283 n. 112, records that Potamkin published “Mecklenburg County” in the paper on 24 June 1933.
26 Harry Alan Potamkin, “Merchant Marine,” Daily Worker, 22 Aug. 1934, 5.
27 Michael Folsom, ed., Mike Gold: A Literary Anthology (New York: International Publishers, 1972), 215.
28 Hicks et al., Proletarian Literature in the United States, 160; Jack Salzman and Leo Zanderer, eds., Social Poetry of the 1930s: A Selection (New York: Burt Franklin & Co., 1978), 87–88.
29 WC, 9.
30 Freeman, introduction to Hicks et al., 19.
31 Cleanth Brooks, Modern Poetry and the Tradition (New York: Oxford University Press, 1965), 51.
32 Freeman, introduction to Hicks et al., 9.
33 New York World cartoon, available at Paul D. Lehrman, ed., The Ballet Mécanique page, at www.antheil.org/art/chotzie.JPG, accessed 23 May 2015.
34 Funaroff, Sol, “Fire Sermon,” New Masses , 8, 2 (Aug. 1932), 16–17 Google Scholar, 17.
35 Gold, Michael, “Kino of a Factory Town,” New Masses , 7, 9 (Feb. 1932), 11–14 Google Scholar, 12.
36 T. S. Eliot, “The Function of Criticism,” in Eliot, Selected Essays (London: Faber and Faber, 1951), 23–34, 30.
37 Ezra Pound, “How to Write,” in Pound, Machine Art and Other Writings, 86–128, 113.
38 Peter Bürger, Theory of the Avant-Garde (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984), 79.
39 T. S. Eliot, Collected Poems, 1909–1962 (London: Faber and Faber, 1974), 208.
40 Zukofsky, “Sincerity and Objectification,” 274.
41 Bürger, 78.
42 See James D. Bloom, Left Letters: The Culture Wars of Mike Gold and Joseph Freeman (New York: Columbia University Press, 1992).
43 WC, 9.
44 Langston Hughes, “Ballad of Lenin,” Daily Worker, 20 Jan. 1934, 9.
45 Cited in Clara Zetkin, “Lenin on Culture,” Daily Worker, 19 Jan. 1934, 5, 20 Jan. 1934, 9.
46 Vladimir Lenin, State and Revolution (1919), Marxists Internet Archive, available at www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1917/staterev/ch05.htm, accessed 1 May 2015.
47 Gold, “Kino of a Factory Town,” 12.
48 Cited in Barbara A. Zuck, A History of Musical Americanism (Ann Arbor: UMI Research Press, 1978), 137.
49 IWY, 179.
50 Felipe Ibarro, letter to the editor, New Masses, 10, 2 (Jan. 1934), 22.
51 Ibid.
52 IWY, 179–80.
53 George Oppen, “The Mind's Own Place,” in Oppen, Selected Prose, Daybooks, and Papers, ed. Stephen Cope (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2007), 29–37, 32.
54 Charles Reznikoff, “Suburban River: Winter,” in The Poems of Charles Reznikoff, 1918–1975 (Boston: Black Sparrow, 2005), 104–8, 107.
55 “We wanted to be ourselves among the rubble,” Oppen told Burton Hatlen in 1980, “which held us half in and half out of political doings.” Burton Hatlen and Tom Mandel, “Poetry and Politics: A Conversation with George and Mary Oppen,” in George Oppen: Man and Poet, ed. Burton Hatlen (Orono: University of Maine, 1981), 23–50, 29.
- 1
- Cited by