Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T04:53:57.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Response of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) to plant density and phosphorus fertilizer under dryland conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

I. P. S. Ahlawat
Affiliation:
Division of Agronomy, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110012, India
C. S. Saraf
Affiliation:
Division of Agronomy, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110012, India

Summary

Field studies were made for 2 years on a sandy loam soil under dryland conditions of north-west India with three pigeon-pea varieties in relation to plant density and the application of phosphate fertilizer. Varieties Pusa Ageti and P4785 with better developed root system and profuse nodulation had higher grain and stalk yield, and higher N and P yield than Prabhat. Root and shoot growth and root nodulation were adversely affected with increasing plant densities in the range 50 × 103 and 150 × 103 plants/ha. Stalk and total N and P yield increased with increasing plant density. Plant density of 117 × 103 plants/ha produced maximum grain yield of 1·53 t/ha. Phosphorus fertilizer promoted root and shoot growth, intensity and volume of nodulation and increased grain, stalk, N and P yield. The effect of plant density on grain yield was more pronounced in the presence of phosphate fertilizer. The economic optimum rate of P ranged between 22·1 and 23·1 kg/ha under different plant densities.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Acharya, C. N., Jain, S. P. & Jha, J. (1953). Studies on the building up of soil fertility by the phosphatic fertilization of legumes. Influence of growing berseem on the nitrogen content of the soil. Journal of Indian Society of Soil Science 1, 5564.Google Scholar
Ahlawat, I. P. S., Saraf, C. S. & Singh, A. (1975). Studies on the performance of pigeonpea varieties to dates of planting and row spacing. Indian Journal of Agronomy 20, 245247.Google Scholar
Allen, O. N. (1962). The Inoculation of Legume Forages. Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Arnon, I. (1975). Physiological principles of dryland crop production. In Physiological Aspects of Dryland Farming (ed. Gupta, U. S.). New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Publishing Co.Google Scholar
De Roo, H. C. (1969). Tillage and root growth. In Root Growth (ed. Whittington, W. J.), pp. 339358. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Hammerton, J. L. (1971). A spacing/planting date trial with Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. Tropical Agriculture 48, 341350.Google Scholar
Hunter, A. S. & Kelley, D. J. (1964). The extension of plant roots into dry soil. Plant Physiology 21, 445451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rathi, S. S., Singh, D. & Malik, R. S. (1974). Response of short duration arhar to dates of sowing, row spacing and phosphate application. Fertiliser News 19, 2731.Google Scholar
Schafer, P. (1967). The manuring of pulses. Qreen Bulletin 20, 3334.Google Scholar
Singh, K., Prasad, R. & Chowdhury, S. L. (1976). Effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and rhizobial inoculation on growth and yield of pigeon pea under rainfed conditions. Indian Journal of Agronomy 20, 4953.Google Scholar
Wiersum, L. K. (1967). Potential sub soil utilization by roots. Plant and Soil 27, 383401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, S. R. & Ohlrogge, A. J. (1962). Principles of nutrient uptake from fertilizer bands. V. Mechanisms responsible for intensive root development in fertilized zones. Agronomy Journal 54, 288291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilsie, C. P. (1935). Seed production studies with legumes in Hawaii. Journal of American Society of Agronomy 27, 784790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar