Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T16:16:09.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modelling the fate of nitrogen in crop and soil in the years following application of 15N-labelled fertilizer to winter wheat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

N. J. Bradbury ,
A. P. Whitmore ,
P. B. S. Hart  and
D. S. Jenkinson
N. J. Bradbury
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Arable Crops Research, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts AL5 2JQ, UK
A. P. Whitmore
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Arable Crops Research, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts AL5 2JQ, UK
P. B. S. Hart
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Arable Crops Research, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts AL5 2JQ, UK
D. S. Jenkinson
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Arable Crops Research, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts AL5 2JQ, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A computer model is presented that describes the flow of nitrogen between crop and soil on the field scale. The model has a compartmental structure and runs on a weekly time-step. Nitrogen enters via atmospheric deposition and by application of fertilizer or organic manures, and is lost through denitrification, leaching, volatilization and removal in the crop at harvest. Organic nitrogen is contained within three of the model compartments – crop residues (including plant material dying off through the growing season), soil microbial biomass and humus. Inorganic nitrogen is held in two pools as NH4+ or NO3-. Nitrogen flows in and out of these inorganic pools as a result of mineralization, immobilization, nitrification, leaching, denitrification and plant uptake. The model requires a description of the soil and the meteorological records for the site – mean weekly air temperature, weekly rainfall and weekly evapotranspiration. The model is designed to be used in a ‘carry forward’ mode – one year's run providing the input for the next, and so on. The model also allows the addition of 15N as labelled fertilizer, and follows its progress through crop and soil. Data from a Rothamsted field experiment in which the fate of a single pulse of labelled N was followed over several years were used to set the model parameters. The model, thus tuned, was then tested against other data from this and two contrasting sites in south-east England. Over a period of 4 years, the root mean square (R.M.S.) difference between modelled and measured quantities of labelled N remaining in the soil of all three sites was c. 7·5 kg N/ha, on average. The root mean square error in the measurements was c. 2·5 kg/ha. Similarly, the R.M.S. difference between modelled and measured recovery of labelled N by the crop was 0·6, compared with 0·3 kg/ha in the measurements themselves.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 121 , Issue 3 , December 1993 , pp. 363 - 379
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Addiscott, T. M. (1983). Kinetics and temperature relationships of mineralization and nitrification in Rothamsted soils with differing histories. Journal of Soil Science 34, 343–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Addiscott, T. M. & Whitmore, A. P. (1987). Computer simulation of changes in soil mineral nitrogen and crop nitrogen during autumn, winter and spring. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 109, 141–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Addiscott, T. M. & Whitmore, A. P. (1991). Simulation of solute leaching in soils of differing permeabilities. Soil Use and Management 7, 94–101.Google Scholar
Aslyng, H. C. & Hansen, S. (1985). Radiation, water and nitrogen balance in crop production. Field experiments and simulation models WATCROS and NITCROS. Hydrotechnical Laboratory, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Bergstrom, L., Johnsson, H. & Tortenson, G. (1991). Simulation of soil nitrogen dynamics using the SOILN model. In Nitrogen Turnover in the Soil/Crop System (Eds Groot, J. J. R., de Willigen, P. & Verberne, E. L. J.), pp. 181–188. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Fenn, L. B. & Hossner, L. R. (1985). Ammonia volatilization from ammonium or ammonium-forming nitrogen fertilizers. Advances in Soil Science 1, 123–170.Google Scholar
French, P. K. & Legg, B. J. (1979). Rothamsted irrigation, 1964–76. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92, 15–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groot, J. J. R., de Willigen, P. & Verberne, E. L. J. (Eds) (1991). Nitrogen Turnover in the Soil/Crop System. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, D. G. M., Reeve, M. J., Thomasson, A. J. & Wright, V. F. (1977). Water retention, porosity and density of field soils. Soil Survey. Technical Monograph No. 9.Google Scholar
Hansen, S., Jensen, H. E., Neilsen, N. E. & Svendsen, H. (1991). Simulation of nitrogen dynamics and biomass production in winter wheat using the Danish simulation model DAISY. In Nitrogen Turnover in the Soil/Crop System (Eds Groot, J. J. R., de Willigen, P. & Verberne, E. L. J.), pp. 245–259. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Hart, P. B. S., Powlson, D. S., Poulton, P. R., Johnston, A. E. & Jenkinson, D. S. (1993). The availability of the nitrogen in the crop residues of winter wheat to subsequent crops. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 121, 355–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodge, C. A. H. (1972). The soils at Saxmundham Experimental Station. Rothamsted Annual Report for 1971. Part 2, 143–148.Google Scholar
Jenkinson, D. S. (1988). Determination of microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen in soil. In Advances in Nitrogen Cycling in Agricultural Ecosystems (Ed. Wilson, J. R.), pp. 368–386. Wallingford: CAB International.Google Scholar
Jenkinson, D. S. & Parry, L. C. (1989). The nitrogen cycle in the Broadbalk Wheat Experiment: a model for the turnover of nitrogen through the soil microbial biomass. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 21, 535–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkinson, D. S., Hart, P. B. S., Rayner, J. H. & Parry, L. C. (1987). Modelling the turnover of organic matter in long-term experiments at Rothamsted. In Soil Organic Matter Dynamics and Soil Productivity (Ed. Cooley, J. H.), pp. 1–8. INTECOL Bulletin 15.Google Scholar
Lawes, J. B., Gilbert, J. H. & Warington, R. (1882). On the amount and composition of the rain and drainage-waters collected at Rothamsted. Journal of the Royal Agricultural Society of England. Second Series 18, 1–71.Google Scholar
Loague, K. M., Green, R. E. & Mulkey, L. A. (1988). Evaluation of mathematical models of solute migration and transformation: an overview and example. In Validation of Flow and Transport Models for the Unsaturated Zone (Eds Wieranga, P. J. & Bachelet, D.), pp. 231–248. Research Report 88-SS-04, Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, USA.Google Scholar
Molina, J. A. E., Clapp, C. E., Shaffer, M. J., Chichester, F. W. & Larson, W. E. (1983). NCSOIL, a model of nitrogen and carbon transformations in soil: description, calibration and behavior. Soil Science Society of America Journal 47, 85–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neeteson, J. J., Greenwood, D. J. & Draycott, A. (1987). A dynamic model to predict yield and optimum nitrogen fertilizer application rate for potatoes. Proceedings No. 262. London: The Fertilizer Society.Google Scholar
Powlson, D. S., Pruden, G., Johnston, A. E. & Jenkinson, D. S. (1986). The nitrogen cycle in the Broadbalk Wheat Experiment: recovery and losses of 15N-labelled fertilizer applied in spring and inputs of nitrogen from the atmosphere. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107, 591–609.Google Scholar
Powlson, D. S., Hart, P. B. S., Poulton, P. R., Johnston, A. E. & Jenkinson, D. S. (1992). Influence of soil type, crop management and weather on the recovery of 15N-labelled fertilizer applied to winter wheat in spring. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 118, 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, J., Kersebaum, K. Chr. & Utermann, J. (1988). Modelling of the nitrogen regime in arable field soils for advisory purposes. In Nitrogen Efficiency in Agricultural Soils (Eds Jenkinson, D. S. & Smith, K. A.), pp. 371–383. London: Elsevier Applied Science.Google Scholar
Rijtema, P. E. & Kroes, J. G. (1991). Some results of nitrogen simulations with the model ANIMO. In Nitrogen Turnover in the Soil/Crop System (Eds Groot, J. J. R., de Willigen, P. & Verberne, E. L. J.), pp. 189–198. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, P. J. & Williams, J. B. (1969). The moisture characteristics of some Rothamsted, Woburn and Saxmundham soils. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 73, 155–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schjørring, J. K., Nielsen, N. E., Jensen, H. E. & Gottschau, A. (1989). Nitrogen losses from field-grown spring barley plants as affected by rate of nitrogen application. Plant and Soil 116, 167–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharpe, R. R., Harper, L. A., Giddens, J. E. & Langdale, G. W. (1988). Nitrogen use efficiency and nitrogen budget for conservation tilled wheat. Soil Science Society of America Journal 52, 1394–1398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorensen, L. H. (1975). The influence of clay on the rate of decay of amino acid metabolites synthesized in soils during decomposition of cellulose. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 7, 171–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanford, G. & Epstein, E. (1974). Nitrogen mineralization-water relations in soils. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 38, 103–107.Google Scholar
Thornley, J. H. M. & Verberne, E. L. J. (1989). A model of nitrogen flows in grassland. Plant, Cell and Environment 12, 863–886.Google Scholar
Verbruggen, J. (1985). Possible model approach for simulation of nitrate losses in the soil. In Assessment of Nitrogen Fertilizer Requirement (Eds Neeteson, J. J. & Dilz, K.), pp. 123–132. Haren: Institute for Soil Fertility.Google Scholar
Weir, A. H. (1988). Estimating losses in the yield of winter wheat as a result of drought, in England and Wales. Soil Use and Management 4, 33–40.Google Scholar
Whitmore, A. P. (1991). A method for assessing the goodness of computer simulation of soil processes. Journal of Soil Science 42, 289–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitmore, A. P. & Addiscott, T. M. (1987). A function for describing nitrogen uptake, dry matter production and rooting by wheat crops. Plant and Soil 101, 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, J., de Wit, C. T. & van Keulen, H. (1989). Modeling long-term crop response to fertilizer and soil nitrogen. Plant and Soil 120, 11–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar