Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T09:58:10.292Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intake and metabolism studies with fresh and wilted silages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

C. A. Morgan ,
R. A. Edwards  and
P. McDonald
C. A. Morgan
Affiliation:
Edinburgh School of Agriculture, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JG
R. A. Edwards
Affiliation:
Edinburgh School of Agriculture, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JG
P. McDonald
Affiliation:
Edinburgh School of Agriculture, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JG
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Fresh and wilted silages (dry matter 169 and 359 g/kg; pH 4·00 and 5·09; lactic acid 165 and 34 g/kg D.M., respectively) were made from ryegrass and used in intake and metabolism experiments with cattle and sheep. Complete ruminant diet (CRD) was used as a control.

Voluntary dry-matter intake of the silages by wether sheep was not significantly different (70·7 and 69·1 g/kg W0·75 for fresh and wilted material, respectively) but was significantly higher (P < 0·001) for CRD (97·9 g/kg W0·76). With rumen-fistulated steers the voluntary intakes of dry matter for the fresh and wilted silages and CRD were 117·1, 105·7 and 130·4 g/kg W0·76, respectively, and were not significantly different. The digestibility of dry matter was significantly higher (P < 0·01) for the fresh and wilted silages (0·751 and 0·698, respectively) than for the CRD (0·608). When incubated in nylon bags in the rumen the silages rapidly lost nitrogen and only 0·2 and 0·3 of nitrogen of the fresh and wilted materials, respectively, remained after 1 h. Between 0·4 and 0·5 of the residual nitrogen in the silages was subsequently lost over a period of 24 h. The loss of the nitrogen of the CRD was much slower and 0·3 of the nitrogen remained after 24 h. The rate of loss of digestible cell wall constituents was similar for the fresh and wilted silages but was slower for the CRD. The silages gave similar rumen fermentation patterns (pH, total volatile fatty acids, acetic, propionic, butyric, valeric and hexanoic acids and ammonia concentrations) during the period following their consumption.

The palatability of the fresh and wilted silages, measured with rumen-fistulated sheep, was less than that of the CRD and a ruminal effect on intake was observed in the case of the silages.

The high intake of the fresh silage is noteworthy, as it casts grave doubt on the widely held view that fermentation acids, particularly lactate, are pre-eminent in governing the voluntary intakes of silages.

From the rapid loss of nitrogen from the silages in nylon bags in the rumen it is concluded that, to increase the utilization of nitrogen, it would be advantageous to reduce protein breakdown in the silo and to supplement silage with a readily available energy source.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 94 , Issue 2 , April 1980 , pp. 287 - 298
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Development and Advisory Service (1976). Nutrient allowances and composition of feeding stuffs for ruminants. Advisory Paper no. 11. London: Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. G. (1974). Factors affecting the protein value of fresh and conserved feeds. Vaxtodling 28, 114–122.Google Scholar
Baile, C. A. & Mayer, J. (1970). Hypothalamic centres: feedbacks and receptor sites in the short-term control of feed intake. In Physiology of Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant (ed. Phillipson, A. T.), pp. 254–263. Newcastle: Oriel Press.Google Scholar
Balch, C. C. & Cowie, A. T. (1962). Permanent rumen fistulae in cattle. Cornell Veterinarian 52, 206–214.Google ScholarPubMed
Bartley, E. E. & Deyoe, C. W. (1977). Reducing the rate of ammonia release by the use of alternative non-protein nitrogen sources. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition – 1977 (ed. Haresign, W. and Lewis, D.), pp. 50–65. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Beever, D. E., Thomson, D. J., Cammell, S. B. & Harrison, D. G. (1977). The digestion by sheep of silages made with and without the addition of formaldehyde. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 88, 61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Clapperton, J. L. (1965). Prediction of the amount of methane produced by ruminants. British Journal of Nutrition 19, 511–522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campling, R. C. (1966). The intake of hay and silage by cows. Journal of the British Grassland Society 21, 41–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campling, R. C. (1970). Physical regulation of voluntary intake. In Physiology of Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant (ed. Phillipson, A. T.), pp. 226–234. Newcastle: Oriel Press.Google Scholar
Chalmers, M. I., Cuthbertson, D. P. & Synge, R. M. L. (1954). Ruminal ammonia formation in relation to the protein requirement of sheep. 1. Duodenal administration and heat processing as factors influencing fate of casein supplement. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 44, 254–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciszuk, P. & Eriksson, S. (1973). Ammonia formation in the rumen of sheep fed grass, clover or lucerne preserved in various ways. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 3, 13–20.Google Scholar
Clancy, M., Bull, L. S., Wangsness, P. J. & Baumgardt, B. R. (1976). Digestible energy intake of complete diets by wethers and lactating ewes. Journal of Animal Science 42, 960–969.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cochran, W. G. & Cox, G. M. (1937). Experimental Designs. 2nd ed.New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Donaldson, E. & Edwards, R. A. (1976). Feeding value of silage: silages made from freshly cut grass, wilted grass and formic acid treated wilted grass. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 27, 536–544.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, R. A. (1978) The metabolizable energy system in practice. 2. Growth. Animal Production 26, 349–350.Google Scholar
Edwards, R. A., Donaldson, E. & Lewis, M. (1976). The Edinburgh School of Agriculture Annual Report, pp. 89–90.Google Scholar
Farhan, S. M. A. & Thomas, P. C. (1978). The effect of partial neutralization of formic acid silages with sodium bicarbonate on their voluntary intake by cattle and sheep. Journal cf the British Grassland Society 33, 151–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, S. S., Conrad, H. R. & Hibbs, J. W. (1969). Relative rate of in vitro cellulose disappearance as a possible estimator of digestible dry matter intake. Journal of Dairy Science 52, 1687–1690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, F. J. (1978). The effect of interval between harvests and wilting on milk production. Fifth Silage Research Conference (ed. Harkness, R. D.), pp. 44–45. Held at the Hannah Research Institute, Ayr.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, J. F. D. & McDonald, I. (1978). The metabolizable energy system in practice. 3. Predicting feed intake. Animal Production 26, 350.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, J. F. D. & Reid, G. W. (1971). Relative palatability to sheep of straw, hay and dried grass. British Journal of Nutrition 26, 107–116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, C. E. & Raymond, W. F. (1963). The effect of ensiling on crop digestiblity. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18, 204–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinks, C. E., Edwards, I. E. & Henderson, A. R. (1976). Beef production from formic acid treated and wilted silages. Animal Production 22, 217–224.Google Scholar
Jarrige, R., Demarquilly, C. & Dulphy, J. P. (1974). The voluntary intake of forages. Vaxtodling 28, 98–106.Google Scholar
Kelly, N. C., Thomas, P. C. & Chamberlain, D. G. (1978). The digestion of dietary protein and synthesis of bacterial protein in the rumen in sheep given silages prepared with the addition of formic acid. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 37, 34A.Google ScholarPubMed
MacRae, J. C. & Wilson, S. (1977). The effects of various forms of gastro-intestinal cannulation on digestive measurements in sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 38, 65–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, P. & Edwards, R. A. (1976). The influence of conservation methods on digestion and utilization of forages by ruminants. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 35, 201–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLeod, D. S. & Wilkins, R. J. (1970). The effect of intra-ruminal feeding on the intake of silage. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 75, 559–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLeod, D. S., Wilkins, R. J. & Raymond, W. F. (1970). The voluntary intake by sheep and cattle of silages differing in free-acid content. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 75, 311–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Department of Agriculture for Scotland, Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland (1975). Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. Technical Bulletin 33. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. (1977). Nutritional principles and evaluation of by-products, waste products and new feeds for ruminants. Livestock Production Science 4, 165–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, J. H. B., Balch, C. C., Miller, E. L., Ørskov, E. R., Smith, R. H. (1977). Calculation of the N-requirement for ruminants from nitrogen metabolism studies. In Protein Metabolism and Nutrition. EAAP Publication no. 22, pp. 126–129. Wageningen: Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentations.Google Scholar
Satter, L. D.Rofeler, R. E. (1977). Influence of nitrogen and carbohydrate inputs on rumen fermentation. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition – 1977 (ed. Haresign, W. and Lewis, D.), pp. 25–49. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Smith, L. W., Goering, H. K.Gordon, C. H. (1972). Relationships of forage compositions with rates of cell wall digestion and indigestibility of cell walls. Journal of Dairy Science 955, 1140–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swan, H. (1978). The metabolizable energy system in practice. 4. Discussion. Animal Production 26, 351.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. (1975). Physico-chemical aspects of fibre digestion. In Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant (ed. McDonald, I. W. and Warner, A. C. I.), pp. 351–365. Armidale, Australia: University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
Wainman, F. W., Blaxter, K. L. & Pullar, J. D. (1970). The nutritive value for ruminants of a complete processed diet based on barley straw. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 74, 311–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldo, D. R. (1977). Potential of chemical preservation and improvement of forages. Journal of Dairy Science, 60, 306–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, R. J. (1978). Ensiled forages and their utilization by ruminants. Paper given at 3rd World Animal Feeding Congress. Madrid, Oct. 1978.Google Scholar
Wilkins, R. J., Hutchinson, K. J., Wilson, R. F. & Arris, C. E. (1971). The voluntary intake of silage by sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 77, 531–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar