Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T02:30:17.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of pre- and post-anthesis periods on yields of winter barley varieties in southern Spain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. M. Ramos ,
L. F. Garcia Del Moral  and
L. Recalde
J. M. Ramos
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Physiology, University of Oranada, Spain
L. F. Garcia Del Moral
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Physiology, University of Oranada, Spain
L. Recalde
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Physiology, University of Oranada, Spain
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Six varieties of winter barley were grown during the years 1979, 1980 and 1981 in Granada (southern Spain). Grain yield variation in the 3 years studied was a function of the pre-anthesis period (especially as a determinant of number of ears/m2). In comparison leaf area duration and grain: leaf ratio from anthesis to ripening had far less influence on grain yield variation. Though these findings contrast with the generally accepted view, they can be explained by environmental conditions prevailing in southern Spain during grain filling.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 99 , Issue 3 , December 1982 , pp. 521 - 523
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Archbold, H. K. (1942). Physiological studies in plant nutrition. XIII. Experiments with barley on defoliation and shading of the ear in relation to sugar metabolism. Annals of Botany (New Series) 6, 487–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, R. B., Morgan, C. L., Ford, M. A. & Blackwell, R. D. (1980). Contributions to grain yield from pro-ant liesis assimilation in tall and dwarf barloy phenotypes in two contrasting seasons. Annals of Botany (New Series) 45, 309–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bidinger, F. R., Musgrave, R. B. & Fischer, R. A. (1977). Contribution of stored pre-anthesis assimilate to grain yield in wheat and barley. Nature, London 270, 431–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chowdhury, S. I. & Wardlaw, I. F. (1978). The effect of temperature on kernel development in cereals. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 29, 205–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. H. & Kirby, E. J. M. (1980). A comparison of spring barloy grown in England and in Scotland. 2. Yield and its components. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 95, 111–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, J. N., Biscoe, P. V. & Hunter, B. (1976). Effects of drought on grain growth. Nature, London 264, 541–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, R. (1978). Plant Growth Analysis Studies in Biology No. 96. 67 pp. London: E. Arnold.Google Scholar
Khalifa, M. A. (1973). Effects of nitrogen on leaf area index, leaf area duration, net assimilation rate and yield of wheat. Agronomy Journal 65, 253–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolderup, F. (1979). Application of different temperatures in three growtli phases of wheat. II. Effects on ear size and seed setting. Ada Agriculturae Scandinavica 29, 6–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kvet, J., Ondok, J. P., Necas, J. & Jarvis, P. G. (1971). Methods of growth analysis. In Plant Photosynthetic Production. Manual of Methods(ed. Sestäk, Z., Catský, J. and Jarvis, P. G.), pp. 343–391. The Hague: Dr W. Junk, N. V.Google Scholar
Lawlor, D. W., Day, W., Johnston, A. E., Legg, B. J. & Parkinson, K. J. (1981). Growth of spring barley: crop development, photosynthesis, dry matter accumulation and nutrient content. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 96, 167–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoy, V. (1965). Photosynthesis, respiration and carbohydrate accumulation in spring wheat in relation to yield. Physiologia Plantarum Supplementum IV. 125 pp.Google Scholar
Thorne, G. N. (1966). Physiological aspects of grain yield in cereals. In The Growth of Cereals and Grasses (ed. Milthorpe, F. L. and Ivins, J. D.), pp. 88–105. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Thorne, G. N. (1974). Physiology of grain yield of wheat and barley. Eothamsted Experimental Station, Report for 1973, part 2, pp. 5–25.Google Scholar
Thorne, G. N. & Ford, M. A. (1971). Sink capacity of wheat ears. Rothamsted Experimental Station, Report for 1970, part 1, pp. 94–95.Google Scholar
Watson, D. J. (1952). The phsyiological basis of variation in yield. Advances in Agronomy 4, 101–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D. J., Thorne, G. N. & French, S. A. W. (1963). Analysis of growth and yield of winter and spring wheats. Annals of Botany (New Series) 27, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welbank, P. J., French, S. A. W. & Witts, K. J. (1966). Dependence of yields of wheat varieties on their leaf area durations. Annals of Botany (New Series) 30, 291–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welbank, P. J., Witts, K. J. & Thorne, G. N. (1968). Effect of radiation and temperature on efficiency of cereals leaves during grain growth. Annals of Botany (New Series) 32, 79–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yap, T. C. & Harvey, B. L. (1972). Relations between grain yield and photosynthetic parts above the flag leaf node in barley. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 52, 241–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar