Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T05:29:24.464Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of cultural factors and mildew on yield of winter barley

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. Bainbridge ,
M. E. Finney  and
J. F. Jenkyn
A. Bainbridge
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Hertfordshire
M. E. Finney
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Hertfordshire
J. F. Jenkyn
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Hertfordshire
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In experiments on winter barley in 1975–6 and 1977–8 early or late sowing, full or half seed rate, nitrogen applied in March or April and tridemorph spray applied in autumn, early spring and late spring were assessed factorially in all combinations for their effects on mildew development, crop growth and grain yield.

Date of sowing had the biggest effect on yield. Early-sown crops (24 September 1975, 6 October 1977) greatly out-yielded the late-sown; by 79·8% in the first year and 53·9% in the second. Late sowing (6 November 1975, 2 November 1977) approximately halved plant emergence. Although late-sown plants developed more tillers, more grains per ear and larger grain this failed to compensate for the thinner stand.

Sowing at half seed rate did not decrease yield when compared with the crop sown at the full seed rate on the same date. In contemporaneous crops extra tillering and larger ears generally compensated for fewer plants.

The effect of date of applying N was variable. April N gave the best yield in the early· and late-sown crops in 1975–6 and in the late-sown crop in 1977–8. However, in the early-sown crop in the second year March N was best. Number of ears was increased in early-sown crops by March N but date of N application had no influence on number of ears in late-sown crops or on the number of grains per ear in any crop.

The winter of 1975–6 was mild and mildew developed on both early· and late-sown crops throughout their growth.

Single tridemorph sprays applied in autumn (14 November) to the early-sown crop or winter (25 February) to the late-sown crop or early spring (9 April) to both crops gave significant yield increases of 6·3–7·6%. Applying two sprays, one in autumn or winter plus one in early spring gave an increase equal to the sum of each applied separately. A late spring spray (14 May) had no significant effect on yield. The 1977–8 winter was colder and although mildew was moderate on the early-sown crop in autumn it was almost absent from this experiment after winter. Spraying failed to increase yield significantly.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 94 , Issue 2 , April 1980 , pp. 389 - 397
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon, . (1974). Agricultural Development and Advisory Service, West Midland Region, Record of Investigations for 1974, pp. 66–70. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Anon, . (1976). Agricultural Development and Advisory Service, Science Service Annual Report for 1975, p. 236. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Bainbridge, A. & Jenkyn, J. F. (1976). Mildew reinfection in adjacent and separated plots of sprayed barley. Annals of Applied Biology 82, 477–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, D. H. (1972). Observations on the effects of mildew, Erysiphe graminis, on growth of spring and winter barley. Annals of Applied Biology 70, 149–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyson, P. W. (1977). An investigation into the relations between some growth parameters and yield of barley. Annals of Applied Biology 87, 471–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, E. J. & Hawkins, J. H. (1971). Timing of fungicidal sprays for control of mildew on spring barley. Proceedings of the 6th British Insecticide and Fungicide Conference 1971, pp. 33–41.Google Scholar
Finney, J. B. & Hall, D. W. (1972). The effect of an autumn attack of mildew (Erysiphe graminis) on the growth and development of winter barley. Plant Pathology 21, 73–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, J. N., Biscoe, P. V. & Scott, R. K. (1975). Barley and its environment. V. Stability of grain weight. Journal of Applied Ecology 12, 319–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, E., Jones, D. G. & Valentine, M. (1975). Effects of powdery mildew at different growth stages on grain yield of barley. Annals of Applied Biology 80, 343–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, D. W. (1971). Control of mildew in winter barley with ethirimol. Proceedings of the 6th British Insecticide and Fungicide Conference 1971, pp. 26–32.Google Scholar
Jenkins, G., Kirby, E. J. M. & Roffey, A. P. (1976). Selection for developmental responses in winter barley. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 87, 591–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, J. E. E. & Storey, I. F. (1975). Influence of spray timing for the control of powdery mildew on the yield of spring barley. Plant Pathology 24, 125–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkyn, J. F. (1974). Effects of mildew on the growth and yield of spring barley, 1969–72. Annals of Applied Biology 78, 281–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkyn, J. F. & Bainbridge, A. (1978). Biology and pathology of cereal powdery mildews. In The Powdery Mildews (ed. Spencer, D. M.), pp. 283–321. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jung, K. U. & Bedford, J. L. (1971). The evaluation of application time of tridemorph for the control of mildew in barley and oats in the United Kingdom. Proceedings of the 6th British Insecticide and Fungicide Conference 1971, pp. 75–81.Google Scholar
Kirby, E. J. M. & Faris, D. G. (1970). Plant population induced growth correlations in the barley plant main shoot and possible hormonal mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Botany 21, 787–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, E. J. M. & Faris, D. G. (1972). The effect of Mildew on winter barley plant density on tiller growth and morphology in barley. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 78, 281–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Large, E. C. & Doling, D. A. (1962). The measurement of cereal mildew and its effect on yield. Plant Pathology 11, 45–57.Google Scholar
Last, F. T. (1962). Analysis of the effects of Erysiphe graminis DC on the growth of barley. Annals of Botany, N.S. 26, 279–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mundy, E. J. & Owers, A. C. (1974). Time of applying fungicides for the control of powdery mildew of spring barley. Experimental Husbandry No. 26, 14–21.Google Scholar
Paulech, C. (1969). Einfluss des Getreidemehltanpilzes Erysiphe graminis DC auf die Trockensubstanzmenge und auf das Wachstum der vegetativen Pflanzenorgane. Bióldgia, Bratislava 24, 709–719.Google Scholar
Rea, B. L. & Scott, R. K. (1973). A preliminary proposal for the detection of barley mildew infection periods. Plant Pathology 22, 11–16.Google Scholar
Symonds, B. V. (1977). Winter barley, mildew and spray timing. Agricultural Development and Advisory Service, Eastern Region, Report of Experiments for 1976, pp. 71–73. Cambridge: Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food.Google Scholar
Symonds, B. V. & Yarham, D. J. (1978). Winter barley, mildew and spray timing. Agricultural Development and Advisory Service, Eastern Region, Report of Experiments for 1977, pp. 72–75. Cambridge: Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food.Google Scholar
Thorne, G. N. (1974). Physiology of grain yield. In Rothamsted Experimental Station Report for 1973, part 2, pp. 5–25.Google Scholar
Turner, D. M. (1956). Studies on cereal mildew in Britain. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 39, 495–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R. H. & Hayes, J. D. (1979). Relationships between photosynthetio area and other growth attributes with grain yield in 6 and 2 row barley genotypes. Annals of Applied Biology 91, 391–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. C. (1972). A spraying machine for small plot experiments. Experimental Husbandry No. 21, 25–26.Google Scholar
Zadoks, J. C, Chang, T. T. & Konzak, C. F. (1974). A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14, 415–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar