Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T12:27:11.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fungicidal control of powdery mildew and its effect on yield, digestibility and chemical composition of eight forage rape cultivars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Cynthia J. Williamson
Affiliation:
Scottish Crop Research Institute, Pentlandfield, Roslin, Midlothian, EH25 9RF
W. H. MacFarlane Smith
Affiliation:
Scottish Crop Research Institute, Pentlandfield, Roslin, Midlothian, EH25 9RF

Summary

Eight forage rape cultivars were grown in replicated trials in 1980, 1981 and 1982; the plots were either inoculated to promote early infection with powdery mildew (Erysiphe cruciferarum) or they received one application of fiuotrimazole (in 1980) or triadimefon (in 1981 and 1982) to control mildew.

Mildew infections first appeared during August and increased rapidly during September to give highly significant differences between cultivars for the percentage leaf area infected in October; cv. Lair had the least mildew and cvs Samo, Early Giant, Bishop and Winfred were most severely infected. Regression analyses were used to investigate the increase in mildew over time in 1980 and 1981. No clear pattern of disease development was evident in 1980, but in 1981 the increase in mildew was predominantly linear and in untreated plots the greatest increase occurred in cvs Winfred, Samo and Bishop and the least in cv. Lair. Mildew was reduced in each year (P < 0·001) on fungicide treated plots and the mean fresh weight yield increase of 4·61 t/ha from treated plots was attributed mainly to the control of E. cruciferarum.

Fungicide treatment had little effect on % organic matter (OM), % digestible organic matter (DOMD) or concentration of thiocyanate ion (SCN-); both % nitrogen (N) and concentration of S-methyl cysteine sulphoxide (SMCO) were reduced in fungicide-treated plots in 1981, and N was also reduced in 1982. The mean concentration of SCN- from treated and untreated plots over 3 years was least in cv. Samo (14·90 mg/100 g D.M.) and greatest in cv. Lair (22·15 mg/100 g D.M.). The response in yield and quality factors to fungicide treatment is discussed in relation to the control of powdery mildew and other, possibly phytotonic, effects.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, M. & Borzucki, R. (1978). Cellulase methods for the efficient digestion of grasses and brassicas. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 29, 293297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, R. H. (1985). The structure of the rape crop (Brassica napus) and its effect on intake by lambs. In Better Brassicas '84. Proceedings of a Meeting at St Andrews, September 1984, pp. 7276.Google Scholar
Bastiman, B. & Slade, C. F. R. (1978). The utilisation of forage crops – a review of recent work undertaken by ADAS. ADAS Quarterly Review 28, 111.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, J. E., Heaney, R. K., Fenwick, G. R. & McNaughton, I. H. (1983). The glucosinolate content of the leaf and stem of fodder kale (Brassica oleracea L.), rape (Brassica napus L.) and radicole (Raphanobrassica). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 34, 571575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, J. E., Heaney, R. K., MacFarlane Smith, W. H., Gowers, S., Gemmell, D. J. & Fenwick, G. R. (1984). The glucosinolate content of some fodder brassicas. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 35, 977981.Google Scholar
Brain, P. J. & Whittington, W. J. (1979). The control of swede powdery mildew. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 93, 5965.Google Scholar
Ellerström, S. & Josefsson, E. (1967). Selection for low content of rhodanidogenic glucosides in fodder rape. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenzüchtung 58, 128135.Google Scholar
Gosden, A. F. (1977). Toxic constituents of forage crops. Welsh Plant Breeding Station Annual Report 1977, pp. 226241.Google Scholar
Gosden, A. F. (1978). An automated procedure for the estimation of thiocyanate in forage kale. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 29, 597600.Google Scholar
Gosden, A. F. (1979). An automated procedure for the estimation of S-methyl cysteine sulphoxide in kale. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 30, 892898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosden, A. F. & Johnston, T. D. (1977). Breeding kale for reduced levels of nutritionally deleterious compounds. In Brassica Forage Crops. Proceedings of a Meeting at Scottish Plant Breeding Station, February 1977, pp. 812.Google Scholar
Griffiths, E. & Scott, S. W. (1977). Possible ‘phytotonic’ effects of fungicides on barley. In Crops Protection Agents (ed. McFarlane, N. R.), pp. 465477. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jenkyn, J. F. & Rawlinson, C. J. (1977). Effect of fungicides and insecticides on mildew, viruses and root yield of swedes. Plant Pathology 26, 166174.Google Scholar
Josefsson, E. (1967). Content of rhodanidogenic glucosides in some Brassica crops. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 18, 492495.Google Scholar
Kolbe, W. (1976). Studies of the fungicidal activity of Bayleton spray applications in cereal and their effect on yields, with special consideration to mildew control and crop tolerance. Pflanzenschutz-nachrichten Bayer 29, 310334.Google Scholar
MacFarlane Smith, W. H., Heppel, V. A. F., Wood, J., Gill, E. & Walker, K. (1985). Husbandry practices in forage rape growing. In Better Brassicas '84. Proceedings of a Meeting at St Andrews, September 1984, pp. 155161.Google Scholar
Priestley, R. H. & Bayles, R. A. (1982). Effect of fungicide treatment on yield of winter wheat and spring barley cultivars. Plant Pathology 31, 3137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittle, P. J., Smith, R. H. & McIntosh, A. (1976). Estimation of S-methyl cysteine sulphoxide (kale anaemia factor) and its distribution among brassica forage and root crops. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 27, 633642.Google Scholar