Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T01:13:16.166Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Extension and knowledge transfer: adaptive management approaches for timely impact

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2013

Q. M. KETTERINGS
Q. M. KETTERINGS*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, 323 Morrison Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: qmk2@cornell.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In recent years, the term ‘adaptive management’ has become integrated in government agriculture and conservation programmes in the United States. Adaptive management is described as ‘a process of developing improved management practices for efficient production and resource conservation by use of participatory learning through continuous systematic assessment’, by the NEERA1002 Coordinating Committee on Adaptive Nutrient Management. Such developments reflect recognition by government agencies of (1) the need for continuous improvement in managing agricultural systems to enhance productivity and environmental protection at farm, state, watershed and federal levels, and (2) the effectiveness of continuous systematic assessment and an outcome-based evaluation in achieving and documenting such progress. Various methods have existed for knowledge development and transfer in the past, some effective, others less successful. The present paper presents and discusses lessons learned from three different adaptive management approaches, implemented at field, whole farm and regional/state levels, which contributed to improvements in field, farm and regional/state balances for nitrogen and phosphorus in New York. These examples show that a combination of governmental regulations and an innovative, outcome-focused adaptive management approach that includes research, extension, and a focus on human dimensions (a people-based approach) will be most effective in obtaining greater sustainability of agriculture in future years.

Type
Nitrogen Workshop Special Issue Papers
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 152 , Supplement S1: Special Issue from the 17th International Nitrogen Workshop , December 2014 , pp. 57 - 64
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blackmer, T. M. & Kyveryga, P. M. (2010). A systematic approach for using precision agriculture tools for on-farm evaluations in Iowa. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Precision Agriculture, Denver, CO, USA (Ed. Khosla, R.), CDROM 135. Madison, WI, USA: ASA/SSSA/CSSA. Available from: http://isafarmnet.com/PRPublications/SystematicApproachUsingPrecAgToolsPAConf2010.pdf (accessed 6 June 2013).Google Scholar
Blackmer, T. M. & Kyveryga, P. M. (2012). Precision tools to evaluate alternative weed management systems in soybean. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Precision Agriculture, Denver, CO, USA (Ed. Khosla, R.), CDROM 1187. Madison, WI, USA: ASA/SSSA/CSSA. Available from: http://isafarmnet.com/pdf/Precision_Tools_Evaluate_Alternative_Weed_Management_Systems_Soybean.pdf (accessed 6 June 2013).Google Scholar
Czymmek, K. J., Ketterings, Q. M., Geohring, L. D. & Albrecht, G. L. (2003). The New York Phosphorus Index. User's Guide and Documentation. CSS Extension Bulletin E03-13. Ithaca, NY, USA: Cornell University.Google Scholar
Gregory, R., Ohlson, D. & Arvai, J. (2006). Deconstructing adaptive management: criteria for applications to environmental management. Ecological Applications 16, 2411–2425.Google Scholar
Holling, C. S. (1978). Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Ketterings, Q. M. & Czymmek, K. J. (2012). Phosphorus index as a phosphorus awareness tool: documented phosphorus use reduction in New York State. Journal of Environmental Quality 41, 1767–1773.Google Scholar
Ketterings, Q. M., Klausner, S. D. & Czymmek, K. J. (2003). Nitrogen Guidelines for Field Crops in New York. CSS Extension Bulletin E03-16. Ithaca, NY, USA: Cornell University.Google Scholar
Ketterings, Q. M., Swink, S. N., Godwin, G., Czymmek, K. J. & Albrecht, G. L. (2005). Maize silage yield and quality response to starter phosphorus fertilizer in high phosphorus soils in New York. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment 3, 237–242.Google Scholar
Ketterings, Q. M., Czymmek, K. J. & Swink, S. N. (2011). Evaluation methods for a combined research and extension program used to address starter phosphorus fertilizer use for corn in New York. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 91, 467–477.Google Scholar
Ketterings, Q. M., Godwin, G., Barney, P., Lawrence, J. R., Aldrich, B., Kilcer, T., Czymmek, K. J. & Gloy, B. (2013 a). Shallow mixing of surface soil and liquid dairy manure conserves nitrogen while retaining surface residue. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 33, 507–517.Google Scholar
Ketterings, Q. M., Godwin, G., DeGolyer, W. & Czymmek, K. J. (2013 b). Trial results for manure injection at Table Rock Farm. What's Cropping Up? 22, 17–22.Google Scholar
Ketterings, Q. M., Godwin, G., Swink, S. N. & Czymmek, K. J. (2013 c). Can manure replace the need for starter nitrogen fertilizer? Agronomy Journal 105, 1597–1605.Google Scholar
Lee, K. N. (1993). Compass and Gyroscope. Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Littell, R. C., Milliken, G. A., Stroup, W. W. & Wolfinger, R. D. (1996). Analysis of repeated measures data. In SAS System for Mixed Models (Eds Little, R. C., Milliken, G. A., Stroup, W. W. & Wolfinger, R. D.), pp. 87–134. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute, Inc.Google Scholar
NASS (National Agricultural Statistics Service) (2009). 2007 Census Publications. Ranking of Market Value of Agricultural Products Sold. Washington, DC: USDA. Available from: http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2007/Online_Highlights/Rankings_of_Market_Value/New_York/ (accessed 6 June 2013).Google Scholar
NASS (National Agricultural Statistics Service) (2010). Overview of the United States Dairy Industry. Washington, DC: USDA. Available from: http://usda01.library.cornell.edu/usda/current/USDairyIndus/USDairyIndus-09-22-2010.pdf (accessed 6 June 2013).Google Scholar
NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service) (2011). Natural Resources Conservation Service. Conservation Practice Standard: Nutrient Management. Code 590. Washington, DC: NRCS. Available from: http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb1046177.pdf (accessed 6 June 2013).Google Scholar
NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service) (2013 a). Natural Resources Conservation Service (New York). Conservation Practice Standard: Nutrient Management Code 590. Washington, DC: NRCS. Available from: http://efotg.sc.egov.usda.gov/references/public/ny/nyps590.pdf (accessed 6 June 2013).Google Scholar
NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service) (2013 b). Adaptive Nutrient Management Process. Agronomy Technical Note No. 7. Washington, DC: NRCS. Available from: http://directives.sc.egov.usda.gov/OpenNonWebContent.aspx?content=33791.wba (accessed 6 June 2013).Google Scholar
Soberon, M. A., Ketterings, Q. M., Rasmussen, C. N. & Czymmek, K. J. (2013). Whole farm nutrient balance calculator for New York dairy farms. Natural Sciences Education 42, 57–67.Google Scholar
Swink, S. N., Ketterings, Q. M., Chase, L. E., Czymmek, K. J. & Mekken, C. J. (2009). Past and future phosphorus balances for agricultural cropland in New York State. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 64, 120–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
USDA & USEPA (United States Department of Agriculture & United States Environmental Protection Agency) (1999). Unified National Strategy for Animal Feeding Operations. Washington, DC: USDA & USEPA. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/npdes/pubs/finafost.pdf (accessed 6 June 2013).Google Scholar
USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2000). 2000 National Water Quality Inventory Report. Washington, DC: USEPA. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/305b/2000report/ (accessed 6 June 2013).Google Scholar
USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2007). National Water Quality Inventory: Report to Congress, 2002 Reporting Cycle. Washington, DC: USEPA. (EPA 841-R-07-001). Available from: http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/guidance/cwa/305b/upload/2007_10_15_305b_2002report_report2002305b.pdf (accessed 6 June 2013).Google Scholar
USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2009). National Water Quality Inventory: Report to Congress, 2004 Reporting Cycle. Washington, DC: USEPA. (EPA 841-R-08-001). Available from: http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/guidance/cwa/305b/upload/2009_01_22_305b_2004report_2004_305Breport.pdf (accessed 6 June 2013).Google Scholar
USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2011). Animal Feeding Operations Air Agreements. Washington, DC: USEPA. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/resources/agreements/caa/cafo-agr.html (accessed 6 June 2013).Google Scholar
Walters, C. J. (1986). Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Walters, C. J. & Holling, C. S. (1990). Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing. Ecology 71, 2060–2068.Google Scholar