Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T01:08:20.159Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An investigation of the usefulness of phosphorus concentrations in tissue water as indicators of the phosphorus status of field-grown spring barley

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. A. Leigh  and
A. E. Johnston
R. A. Leigh
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herfordshire, AL5 2JQ
A. E. Johnston
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herfordshire, AL5 2JQ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effects of recalculating P concentrations in spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L. cv. Georgie or Julia) on the basis of tissue water were investigated. Expressing P concentrations in this way altered their apparent behaviour with time. Whereas % P in dry matter declined during growth, P concentrations in tissue water decreased initially but then increased. The rate of increase became more rapid during senescence. Nitrogen and water supplies induced differences in % P in dry matter but these were reduced when P concentrations were expressed on the basis of tissue water. Like % P in dry matter, P concentrations in tissue water were lower in crops grown on a soil that had not received P since 1852. It is suggested that P concentrations in tissue water can provide a method for assessing crop P status that has some advantages over % P in dry matter.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 107 , Issue 2 , October 1986 , pp. 329 - 333
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bates, T. E. (1971). Factors affecting critical nutrient concentrations in plants and their evaluation: a review. Soil Science 112, 116–130.Google Scholar
Day, W., Legg, B. J., French, B. K., Johnston, A. E., Lawlor, D. W. & Jeffers, W. deC. (1978). A drought experiment using mobile shelters: the effect of drought on barley yield, water use and nutrient uptake. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 599–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogg, D. N. & Wilkinson, N. T. (1958). The colorimetric determination of phosphorus. The Analyst 83, 406–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansen, C. (1978). Effect of plant age on element concentrations in parts of Desmodium intortum cv. Greenleaf. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 9, 279–297.Google Scholar
Leigh, R. A. & Johnston, A. E. (1983 a). Concentrations of potassium in the dry matter and tissue water of field-grown spring barley and their relationships to grain yield. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 101, 675–685.Google Scholar
Leigh, R. A. & Johnston, A. E. (1983 b). The effects of fertilizers and drought on the concentrations of potassium in the dry matter and tissue water of fieldgrown spring barley. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 101, 741–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leigh, R. A. & Johnston, A. E. (1985). Nitrogen concentrations in field-grown spring barley: an examination of the usefulness of expressing concentrations on the basis of tissue water. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 105, 397–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leigh, R. A. & Wyn Jones, R. G. (1984). A hypothesis relating critical potassium concentrations for growth to the distribution and functions of this ion in the plant cell. New Phytologist 97, 1–13.Google Scholar
Ulrich, A. & Hills, F. J. (1967). Principles and practices of plant analysis. In Soil Testing and Plant Analysis, Part II (ed. Hardy, G. W.), pp. 11–24. Soil Science Society of America, Special Publication Number 2.Google Scholar
Warren, R. G. & Johnston, A. E. (1967). Hoosfield Continuous Barley. Rothamsted Experimental Station, Report for 1966, pp. 320–338.Google Scholar