Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:21:00.294Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The appraisal of fineness in greasy wool sale lots

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

K. J. Whiteley  and
D. Charlton
K. J. Whiteley
Affiliation:
School of Wool and Pastoral Sciences, The University of New South Wales, P.O. Box 1, Kensington, N.S.W. 2033, Australia
D. Charlton
Affiliation:
Australian Wool Corporation, 261 George Street, Sydney, N.S.W. 2000, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Relationships among quality number, crimp frequency and. fibre diameter of sale lots are reported for a wide range of Australian wools, the quality number appraisals being those of the selling broker and the successful bidder at auction.

Results show that sale lots classified as having the same quality number exhibit a 95% confidence interval of ± 2·5 μm about the mean value. This variation is attributed first to the dependence of quality number on staple crimp frequency and secondly to the strength of the relationship between crimp frequency and fibre diameter.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 85 , Issue 1 , August 1975 , pp. 45 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

David, H. G. (1968). Studies of the variability of some characteristics of Australian wool (AWB types 413 and 40) in auction lots. Journal of the Textile Institute 59, 513–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, H. G. & O'Donnell, R. E. (1971). The variability of yield and fineness in some carding and inferior topmaking wools. Journal of the Textile Institute 62, 166–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, S. A. S. (1965). Variability of some measureable characters in Australian greasy Merino wool lots. Journal of the Textile Institute 56, T14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, S. A. S. & McIntyre, G. A. (1970). Subjective and objective appraisal of wool. Wool Economic Research Report No. 20. Bureau of Agricultural Economics, Canberra, A.C.T., Australia.Google Scholar
Duerden, J. E. (1929). Standards of thickness and crimp in Merino grease wools. Journal of the Textile Institute 20, T93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, J. F. P. (1970). The air-flow fineness of greasy wool: inter-laboratory tests of a proposed standard procedure. Journal of the Textile Institute 61, 520–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LangW, R. W, R. (1947). The crimp-fineness relationship in Australian wool. Journal of the Textile Institute 38, T241–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinnon, J. M. & Whiteley, K. J. (1974). Some observations on the objective characteristics of classed wool clips, Part 1. District analysis. Journal of the Textile Institute 65, 115–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, N. F. & Dunlop, A. A. (1957). Relations between crimp and fineness in Australian Merinos. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 8, 524–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedeoor, G. & Cochran, W. G. (1967). Statistical Method. Iowa, U.S.A.: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Whan, R. B. (1971). The economics of wool classing. Wool Economic Research Report, No. 21, Bureau of Agricultural Economics, Canberra, A.C.T., Australia.Google Scholar
Whiteley, K. J. & Wilkins, O. D. (1974). Some observations on the objective characteristics of classed wool clips, Part II. A theoretical approach to wool classing. Journal of the Textile Institute 65, 164–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiteley, K. J. & McKinnon, J. M. (1974). Some observations on the objective characteristics of classed wool clips, Part III. Fineness group analysis. Journal of the Textile Institute 65, 235–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar