Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T13:37:03.232Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Variance Component Approach To Industry Cost Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Richard L. Kilmer
Affiliation:
Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida
Daniel S. Tilley
Affiliation:
Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida Florida Department of Citrus

Extract

Cost and volume data used in long-run cost studies often are observations from a single cross-section on firms or the average of multiple observations for each firm [1, 3, 5]. Averaging costs and volume over a time series is designed to eliminate the effect of short-run disturbances on the estimated long-run cost function. This practice results in a loss of information on the cost effects of short-run disturbances and significantly reduces the potential degrees of freedom that could result from pooling cross-sectional time-series data. In order to pool data, binary variables for each firm previously have been used to account for short-run fixed firm effects [4].

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Allen, Robert F.Cross-Sectional Estimates of Cost Economies in Stock Property-Liability Companies,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, Volume 56, February 1974, pp. 100103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Allen, Robert F.Season Annual Report, Winter Haven, Florida: Division of Fruit and Vegetable Inspection, various issues.Google Scholar
[3]Griliches, Zvi. “Cost Allocation in Railroad Regulation,” The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, Volume 3, Spring 1972, pp. 2641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Johnson, Paul R.Some Aspects of Estimating Statistical Cost Functions,“ Journal of Farm Economics, Volume 46, February 1964, pp. 179187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Keeler, Theodore E.Airline Regulation and Market Performance,” The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, Volume 3, Autumn 1972, pp. 299424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Machado, Virgilio Azuil Pascoa. “A Dynamic Mixed Integer Location Model Applied to Florida Citrus Packinghouses,” unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Florida, 1978.Google Scholar
[7]Maddala, G. S.The Use of Variance Components Models in Pooling Cross Section and Time Series Data,” Econometrica, Volume 39, March 1971, pp. 341358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Maddala, G. S.Econometrics, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1977.Google Scholar
[9]Stolisteimer, J. F., Bressler, R. G., and Boles, J. N.. “Cost Functions from Cross-Section Data—Fact or Fantasy?”, Agricultural Economics Research Volume 13, July 1961, pp. 7988.Google Scholar
[10]Wallace, T. D. and Hussain, Ashig. “The Use of Error Component Models in Combining Cross-Sectional with Time-Series Data,” Econometrica, Volume 37, January 1969, pp. 5772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Ward, Ronald W. and Davis, James E.. “A Pooled Cross-Section Time-Series Model of Coupon Promotions,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 60, August 1978, pp. 393401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Ward, Ronald W. and Kilmer, Richard L.. The United States Citrus Subsector: Organization, Behavior and Performance, North Central Regional Research Publication No. 263, NC-117 Monograph 8 (in press).Google Scholar