No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Value of Planting Flexibility Provisions in the 1990 Farm Bill to Three Representative Texas Farms
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 April 2015
Abstract
The 1990 Farm Bill reduces deficiency payments but also provides more planting flexibility for program participants. In this study, a mean-standard deviation analysis is used to analyze the impacts of planting flexibility provisions on crop selection decisions, farm returns, and farm risk. Results show that gains from the added planting flexibility do not offset the mandatory loss in the deficiency payments for program participants. Planting flexibility will lead to an increase in corn and wheat planted in the Northern Plains and an increase in cotton planted in the Rolling Plains and Coastal Bend, Texas.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1994
References
Adams, R.M., Meukhans, D.J., and Woolery, B.A.. “Alternative Parameter Specification in EV Analysis - Implications for Farm Level Decision Making.” W. J. Agr. Econ., 50(1980): 13–20.Google Scholar
Brink, L. and McCarl, B.. “The Trade-off Between Expected Return and Risk Among Corn-Belt Crop Farmers.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 60(1978): 259–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Featherstone, A.M., and Moss, C.B.. “Quantifying Gains to Risk Diversification Using Certainty Equivalence in a Mean-Variance Model - An Application to Florida Citrus.” S. J. Agr. Econ., (1990): 191–97.Google Scholar
Freund, R.J. “The Introduction of Risk into a Programming Model.” Econometrica, 24(1956):253–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarl, B.A. and Bessler, D.. “Estimating an Upper Bound on the Pratt Risk Aversion Coefficient When the Utility Function is Unknown.” Austr. J. Agr. Econ., 24(1977):17–30.Google Scholar
McCarl, B.A. “Cropping Activities in Agricultural Sector Models: A Methodological Proposal.” Australian J. Agr. Econ., 14(1982):768–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musser, W.N., and Stamoulis, K.G.. “Evaluating the Food and Agriculture Act of 1977 with Firm Quadratic Risk Programming.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 63(1981):448–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, G.M., McCarl, B.A., Rister, M.E., and Richardson, J.W.. “Modeling Government Program Participation Decisions at the Farm Level.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 71(1989):1011–1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, G.M., Rister, M.E., Richardson, J.W., and Bessler, D.A.. “Incorporating Government Program Provisions into a Mean-Variance Framework.” 5. J. Agr. Econ., (1989):95–105.Google Scholar
Pratt, J.W. “Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large.” Econometrica, 32(1964): 122–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, J.W., Smith, E.G., Sechrist, D.R., and Knutson, R.D.. “Farm Level Impacts of Flexibility.” AFPC Policy Working Paper 90-2, Texas A&M University, 1990.Google Scholar
Scott, J.T. Jr., and Baker, C.B.. “A Practical Way to Elect an Optimum Farm Plan Under Risk.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 54(1972):657–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Texas A&M University System, Texas Agricultural Extension Service, Texas Crop Enterprise Budgets, Various Reports, 1991.Google Scholar
Tobin, J. “Liquidity Preference as Behavior toward Risk.” Review of Economic Studies, 25(1958):65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsiang, S. “The Rational of the Mean-Standard Deviation Analysis, Skewness, Preference and the Demand for Money.” Amer. Econ. Rev., 62(1972):354–371.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Texas Agricultural Statistics Service. Texas Agricultural Statistics. Various Reports, 1986–1990.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Agricultural Outlook, Various issues, 1986–1990.Google Scholar
Weimar, M.R. and Hallam, A.. “Risk Diversification and Vegetables as an Alternative Crop for Midwestern Agriculture.” No. Cent. J. Agr. Econ., 10(1988):75–89.Google Scholar
Westcott, P.C. “Planting Flexibility and Land Allocation.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ,. 73(1991):1105–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar