Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-7qhmt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T18:15:44.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

U.S. Agricultural Producer Perceptions of ClimateChange

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Roderick M. Rejesus
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina
Maria Mutuc-Hensley
Affiliation:
International Center for Agricultural Competitiveness, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas
Paul D. Mitchell
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
Keith H. Coble
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi
Thomas O. Knight
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas
Get access

Abstract

This study examines U.S. crop producers' perceptions of climate change, itseffects on crop agriculture, and likely ways farmers would adapt to weatherextremes. Based on a survey of crop producers in four states, we find that asignificant proportion of farmers do not perceive that climate change hasbeen scientifically proven and do not believe that it will adversely affectaverage crop yields and yield variability. Farmers are likely to diversifycrops, buy crop insurance, modify lease arrangements, and exit farming inresponse to extreme weather caused by climate change.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Farm Bureau Federation. Reply letter by Bob Stallman, president, American Farm Bureau Federation, to three scientists who wrote AFBF regarding climate change policy. Internet site: www.fb.org/index.php7action=newsroom.news&year = 2010 &file=nrO 128.html (Accessed October 20, 2012).Google Scholar
Borick, C., and Rabe., B. Continued Rebound in American Belief in Climate Change: Spring 2012 NSAPOCC Findings. Internet site: www.brookings.edu/~/media/research/files/papers/2012/6/11 %20climate%20rabe%20borick/nsapocc_belief_spring%20formatted (Accessed October 12, 2012).Google Scholar
Brody, S., Grover, H., Lindquist, E., and Vedlitz., A.Examining Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation Behaviors among Public Sector Organizations in the United States.” Local Environment 15(2010):591603.10.1080/13549839.2010.490828Google Scholar
Deressa, T.T., Hassan, R.M., Ringler, C., Alemu, T., and Yesuf., M.Determinants of Farmers' Choice of Adaptation Methods to Climate Change in the Nile Basin of Ethiopia.” Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions 19(2009):248–55.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.01.002Google Scholar
Diggs, D.M.Drought Experience and Perception of Climatic Change among Great Plains Farmers.” Great Plains Research 1(1991): 114– 32.Google Scholar
Dunlap, R., and McCright., A.M.A Widening Gap: Republican and Democratic Views on Climate Change.” Environment 50(2008) :2635.10.3200/ENVT.50.5.26-35Google Scholar
Eicker, F.Limit Theorems for Regressions with Unequal Dependent Errors.” Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, 1967, pp. 5982.Google Scholar
Etkin, D., and Ho., E.Climate Change: Perceptions and Discourses of Risk.” Journal of Risk Research 10(2007):623–41.10.1080/13669870701281462Google Scholar
Geweke, J.Bayesian Inference in Econometric Models Using Monte Carlo Integration.” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 57(1989):1317–39.10.2307/1913710Google Scholar
Greene, W. Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2007.Google Scholar
Hajivassiliou, V.Simulation Estimation Methods for Limited Dependent Variables Models.” Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers: 1007. New Haven, CT: Yale University, 1991.Google Scholar
Hasegawa, H.Analyzing Tourists' Satisfaction: A Multivariate Ordered Probit Approach.” Tourism Management 31 (2010): 8697.10.1016/j.tourman.2009.01.008Google Scholar
Huber, P.J.The Behavior of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Under Non-Standard Conditions.” Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, 1967, pp. 5982.Google Scholar
Kahan, D.M., Peters, E., Braman, D., Slovic, P., Wittlin, M., Ouellette, L. Larrimore, and Mandel., G.The Tragedy of the Risk-perception Commons: Culture Conflict, Rationality Conflict, and Climate Change.” Cultural Cognition Project Working paper No. 89, 2011.Google Scholar
Keane, M.A Computationally Practical Simulation Estimator for Panel Data.” Econometrica 62(1994):95116.10.2307/2951477Google Scholar
Kiefer, N.M.Testing for Dependence for Multivariate Probit Models.” Biometrika 69(1982): 161-66.10.1093/biomet/69.1.161Google Scholar
Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., and Hmielowski., J.D. Climate Change in the American Mind: Americans' Global Warming Beliefs and Attitudes in March 2012. Internet site: http://environment.yale.edu/climate/files/Climate-Beliefs-March-2012.pdf (Accessed September 24, 2012).Google Scholar
Norgaard, K.M.Cognitive and Behavioral Challenges in Responding to Climate Change.” Policy Research Working Paper 4940. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2009.Google Scholar
Patt, A.G., and Schröter, D.. “Perceptions of Climate Risk in Mozambique: Implications for the Success of Adaptation Strategies.” Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions 18(2008):458-67.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.04.002Google Scholar
Pongiglione, F.‘The Key Role of Causal Explanation in the Climate Change Issue.’ Theo-ria— .” An International Journal of Philosophy of Science 74(2012): 175–88.Google Scholar
Reynolds, T.W., Bostrom, A., Read, D., and Morgan, M. Granger. “Now What Do People Know about Global Climate Change? Survey Studies of Educated Laypeople.” Risk Analysis 30(2010): 1520-38.10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01448.x20649942Google Scholar
Roncoli, C., Orlove, B.S., Kabugo, M.R., and Waisa., M.M.Cultural Styles of Participation in Farmers' Discussions of Seasonal Climate Forecasts in Uganda.” Agriculture and Human Values 28(2011): 123-38.10.1007/s10460-010-9257-yGoogle Scholar
Saleh Safi, A., Smith, W.J., and Liu., Z.Rural Nevada and Climate Change: Vulnerability, Beliefs, and Risk Perception.” Risk Analysis 32(2012): 1041–59.10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01836.x22583075Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture-Economic Research Service. Internet site: www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/farmincome/data/Bs_t5.htm (Accessed May 10, 2010).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture-National Agricultural Statistical Service. 2007 Census of Agriculture. Internet site: www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2007/Full_Report/usv1.pdf (Accessed September 2012).Google Scholar
Velandia, M., Rejesus, R.M., Knight, T.O., and Sherrick., B.J.Factors Affecting Farmers' Utilization of Agricultural Risk Management Tools: The Case of Crop Insurance, Forward Contracting, and Spreading Sales.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 41,1(2009): 107-23.S1074070800002583Google Scholar
Weber, E.U.Perception and Expectation of Climate Change: Precondition for Economic and Technological Adaptation.” Environment, Ethics, and Behavior: The Psychology of Environmental Valuation and Degradation. Bazerman, M.H., Messick, D.M., Tenbrunsel, A.E. and Wade-Benzoni, K.A., eds. San Francisco, CA: New Lexington Press, 1997, pp. 314–41.Google Scholar
Weber, E.U.Experience-Based and Description-Based Perceptions of Long-Term Risk: Why Global Warming Does Not Scare Us (yet).” Climatic Change 77,1(2006): 103-20.10.1007/s10584-006-9060-3Google Scholar
Weber, E.U.What Shapes Perceptions of Climate Change?WIREs Climate Change 1(2010): 332–42.10.1002/wcc.41Google Scholar
White, H.A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Co-variance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test of Heteroskedasticity.” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 48,4(1980):817-38.10.2307/1912934Google Scholar