Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T01:08:02.617Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Agricultural Impacts of Biofuels Production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Marie E. Walsh ,
Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte ,
Burton C. English ,
Kimberly Jensen ,
Chad Hellwinckel ,
R. Jamey Menard  and
Richard G. Nelson
Marie E. Walsh
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
Burton C. English
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
Kimberly Jensen
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
Chad Hellwinckel
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
R. Jamey Menard
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
Richard G. Nelson
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Extension, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Get access

Abstract

Analysis of the potential to supply 25% of projected 2025 U.S. transportation fuels indicates sufficient biomass resources are available to meet increased demand while simultaneously meeting food, feed, and export needs. Corn and soybeans continue to be important feedstocks for ethanol and biodiesel production, but cellulose feedstocks (agricultural crop residues, energy crops such as switchgrass, and forestry residues) will play a major role. Farm income increases, mostly because of higher crop prices. Increased crop prices increase the cost of producing biofuels.

Keywords

biodieselbiofuelsbiomasscellulose feedstockscrop residuesethanolforest residuesswitchgrassO11Q11Q41
Type
Invited Paper Sessions
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , August 2007 , pp. 365 - 372
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aden, A., Ruth, M., Ibsen, K., Jechura, J., Neeves, K., Sheehan, J., Wallance, B., Montague, L., Slayton, A., and Lukas, J.. Lignocellulosic Bio-mass to Ethanol Design and Economics Utilizing Prehydolysis and Enzymatic Hydrolysis for Corn Stover. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory, NREL/TP-510-32438, 2002.Google Scholar
BBI International. “State of Maine Ethanol Pre-Feasibility Study.” Prepared for Finance Authority of Maine, 2002.Google Scholar
Brown, R.C.Biorenewable Resources—Engineering New Products from Agriculture. Ames, IA: Iowa State Press, 2003.Google Scholar
De La Torre Ugarte, D.G., Walsh, M.E., Shapouri, H., and Slinsky, S.P.. The Economic Impacts of Bioenergy Crop Production on U.S. Agriculture. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture/Office of the Chief Economist, Agricultural Economic Report 816, 2003.Google Scholar
Electric Power Research Institute. Renewable Energy Technology Characterizations. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy, DOE-TR-109496, 1997.Google Scholar
English, B., Jensen, K., and Menard, J.. “Economic Feasibility of Producing Biodiesel in Tennessee.” Prepared for Frazier, Barnes & Associates, Lie, 2002.Google Scholar
FAPRI (Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute). FAPRI 2006 U.S. and World Agricultural Outlook. Ames, IA: FAPRI Staff Report 06-FSR 1, 2006.Google Scholar
Haynes, R.W.An Analysis of the Timber Situation in the United States: 1952 to 2050. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-560, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heid, W.G. Jr. Turning Great Plains Crop Residues and Other Products into Energy. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Agricultural Economic Report 523, 1984.Google Scholar
McAloon, A., Taylor, F., Yee, W., Ibsen, K., and Wooley, R.. Determining the Cost of Producing Ethanol From Corn Starch and Lignocellulosic Feedstocks. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory, NREL/TP-580-28893, 2000.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, S.B., and Kszos, L.A.. “Summary of 10 Years of Research Progress in Improvement of Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) as a Dedicated Bioenergy Feedstock.” Biomass and Bioenergy 28(June 2005):515–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McQuillan, A., Skog, K., Nagle, T., and Loveless, R.. “Marginal Cost Supply Curves for Utilizing Forest Waste Wood in the United States.” Unpublished manuscript, University of Montana-Missoula, February 1988.Google Scholar
Nelson, R.G. “Resource Assessment and Removal Analysis for Corn Stover and Wheat Straw in the Eastern and Midwestern United States— Rainfall and Wind-Induced Soil Erosion Methodology.” Biomass and Bioenergy 22(2002):349-63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ocumpaugh, W., Hussey, M., Read, J., Muir, J., Hons, F., Evers, G., Cassida, K., Venuto, B., Grichar, J., and Tischler, C.. Evaluation of Switchgrass Cultivar s and Cultural Methods for Bio-mass Production in the South Central U.S.—Consolidated Report 2002. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, ORNL/SUB-03-19XSY091C/01, 2003.Google Scholar
Parrish, D.J., Wolf, D.D., Fike, J.H., and Daniels, W.L.. Switchgrass as a Biofuels Crop for the Upper Southeast: Variety Trials and Cultural Improvements—Final Report for 1997 to 2001. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, ORNL/SUB-03-19XSY163/01, 2003.Google Scholar
Ray, D.E., and Moriak, T.F.. “POLYSIM: A National Agricultural Policy Simulator.” Agricultural Economics Research 28(1976):14–21.Google Scholar
Sheehan, J., Aden, A., Paustian, K., Killian, K., Brenner, J., Walsh, M., and Nelson, R.. “Energy and Environmental Aspects of Using Corn Stover for Fuel Ethanol.” Journal of Industrial Ecology 7(2004): 117-46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, W.B.Factors and Equations to Estimate Forest Biomass in the North Central Region. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station Research Paper NC-268, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taliaferro, C.M. Breeding and Selection of New Switchgrass Varieties for Increased Biomass Production. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, ORNL/SUB-02-19XSY162C/01, 2002.Google Scholar
Taliaferro, C.M., Vogel, K.P., and Bouton, J.H.. “Scale-Up and Commercialization of New Switchgrass Cultivars.” Unpublished manuscript, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2002.Google Scholar
USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture), Forest Service, Internet site: www.fia.fs.fed.us (Accessed July 27, 2006).Google Scholar
USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture), Office of the Chief Economist. USDA Agricultural Baseline Projections to 2015. Washington, DC: World Agricultural Outlook Board Baseline Report OCE-2006-1, 2006.Google Scholar
Vogel, K.P., and Jung, H.G.. Genetic Improvement of Switchgrass and Other Herbaceous Plants for Use as a Biomass Fuel Feedstock—Final Report. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, ORNL/SUB/90-90OR21954/1, 2000.Google Scholar
Wilhelm, W.W., Johnson, J.M.F., Hatfield, J.L., Voorhees, W.B., and Linden, D.R.. “Crop and Soil Productivity Response to Corn Residue Removal: A Literature Review.” Agronomy Journal 96(January-February 2004): 1–17.Google Scholar