Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T08:48:30.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Agricultural Economics Students at Southern Land Grant Universities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

John L. Adrian ,
John E. Dunkelberger  and
Joseph J. Molnar
John L. Adrian
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Auburn University
John E. Dunkelberger
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Auburn University
Joseph J. Molnar
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Auburn University
Get access

Extract

Agricultural economics occupies an unique position in most agriculture programs because it and rural sociology are the only social sciences among a broad array of plant, animal, and technical disciplines. As economic and technological changes have added to the complexity, of U.S. agriculture, the relative importance of agricultural economics has increased. The demand for individuals possessing knowledge of the technical aspects of agriculture and the ability to evaluate the social and economic ramifications of alternatives is increasing.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , July 1981 , pp. 133 - 138
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Coutu, Arthur J. “Agricultural Economics and the Changing Structure of Higher Education.” S. J. Agr. Econ. 8(1976):47–52.Google Scholar
Helmberger, John D. “The Market for Agricultural Economists.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 55(1973):725–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, Frank and Parent, Dale. Methodology for a Regional Study of Higher Education in Agriculture and Home Economics in the South. Dept. of Sociology, Mississippi State University, 1977.Google Scholar
Kropp, Russell P. “Curriculum Development: Principles and Methods.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 55(1973):735–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuvlesky, W. P. and Bealer, R. C. “A Clarification of the Concept of Occupational Choice.” Rural Sociology 31(1976):265–76.Google Scholar
Manderscheid, Lester V. “Guidelines for Curriculum Changes in Agricultural Economics.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 55(1973):740–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, Jessica. “Note on Female Farmers.” Rural Sociology 44(1979): 189–200.Google Scholar
Roberts, Dayton Young and Lee, Hong Yong. “Personalizing Learning Processes in Agricultural Economics.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 59(1977): 1022–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shibutani, Tomatsu. “Reference Groups as Perspectives.” Amer. J. Sociology 60(1955):562–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjo, John, Orazem, Frank, and Biere, Arlo. “Undergraduate Program Revision at Kansas State University.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 55(1973):604–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snodgrass, Milton M. “Off-Campus Work and Study Experience Programs for Undergraduate Students in Agricultural Economics and Agricultural Business Management.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 56(1974): 1153–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thrift, F. A. and Robertson, J. C. “Agriculture and Natural Resources Education from the Animal Science Point of View,” in RICOP Report, Armstrong, D. L., ed., Michigan State University, East Lansing, 1977, pp. 356–72.Google Scholar
Walker, Odell L. “Innovations in Undergraduate and Extension Teaching: Discussion.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 60(1978):1003–07.CrossRefGoogle Scholar