Hostname: page-component-797576ffbb-5676f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-12-05T01:29:34.526Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

Invasive Species Control over Space and Time: Miconia calvescens on Oahu, Hawaii

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Kimberly M. Burnett
Department of Economics, University of Puget Sound, Tacoma, WA
Brooks A. Kaiser
Department of Economics, Gettysburg College, Gettysburg, PA
James A. Roumasset
Department of Economics, University of Hawaii, Manoa, Honolulu, HI
Get access


The optimal size and location of an invasive species population depend upon spatially differentiated biological growth, economic costs, and damages. Although largely absent from most economic models, spatial considerations matter because the likelihood and magnitude of the invasion vary spatially and the threatened assets may be unevenly distributed across space. We map the current and future populations of an invasive species, Miconia calvescens, on Oahu, Hawaii, and the potential damages to water quantity, quality, and endangered-species habitat, and weigh these against treatment costs. We find that optimal densities vary from approximately 1% to 18% cover throughout the island.

Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Burnett, K.M., Kaiser, B.A., Pitafi, B.A., and Roumasset, J.A.. “Prevention, Eradication, and Containment of Invasive Species: Illustrations from Hawaii.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 35(2006):6377.Google Scholar
Burnett, K.M., Kaiser, B.A., and Roumasset, J.A.. “Economic Lessons from Control Efforts for an Invasive Species: Miconia calvescens in Hawaii.” Journal of Forest Economics, in press.Google Scholar
Jerardo, A.Floriculture and Nursery Crops Yearbook: Electronic Report from the Economic Research Service. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service, 2006. Internet site: (Accessed March 1, 2007).Google Scholar
Kaiser, B.A., and Roumasset, J.A.. “Water Management and the Valuation of Indirect Environmental Services.” Interdisciplinary Environmental Review 2(2000): 102122.Google Scholar
Kaiser, B.A., and Roumasset, J.A.. “Valuing Indirect Ecosystem Services: The Case of Tropical Watersheds.” Environment and Development Economics 7(2002):701714.Google Scholar
Kaiser, B.A., and Roumasset, J.A.. “Valuing Watershed Conservation for Groundwater and Nearshore Ecology.” Proceedings of A WRA Summer Specialty Conference, 2005.Google Scholar
Loomis, J.B., and White, D.S.. “Economic Benefits of Rare and Endangered Species: Summary and Meta-analysis.” Ecological Economics 18(1996): 197206.Google Scholar
Meyer, J.Y.Observations on the Reproductive Biology of Miconia calvescens DC (Melastomataceae), an Alien Invasive Tree on the Island of Tahiti (South Pacific Ocean).” Biotropica 30(4)(1998):609624.Google Scholar
Olson, L.J., and Roy, S.. “On Prevention and Control of an Uncertain Biological Invasion.” Review of Agricultural Economics 27(2005):491497.Google Scholar
Pitafi, B., and Roumasset, J.. “Some Resource Economics of Invasive Species.” 2007.Google Scholar
Pysek, P., and Hulme, P.E.. “Spatio-temporal Dynamics of Plant Invasions: Linking Pattern to Process.” Ecoscience 12(2005):302315.Google Scholar
Shigesada, N., and Kawasaki, K.. Biological Invasions: Theory and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, and U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau. 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, 2001.Google Scholar