Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-568f69f84b-pl66f Total loading time: 0.153 Render date: 2021-09-21T03:30:12.205Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

An Evaluation of Cost of Production Information Usage by County Agents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

DeeVon Bailey
Affiliation:
Department of Economics at Utah State University
Douglas W. Eck
Affiliation:
Department of Economics at Utah State University
Terrence F. Glover
Affiliation:
Department of Economics at Utah State University
Get access

Abstract

County agents receive cost of production information primarily from state extension services and then disseminate it to agricultural producers. A survey gathered data on agent usage of this information. A Poisson regression analysis using count data was performed to determine the factors influencing the number of times county agents directly referred to published cost of production (enterprise budget) information in a year. The agent's understanding of budget information use in management decisions, the availability of budgets, and his/her receiving the budgets in multiple forms (e.g., sheets, booklets, or software) had significant positive impacts on the use of budgets by the agent.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agresti, A. Analysis of Ordinal Categorical Data. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1984.Google Scholar
Boehlje, M.D. and Eidman, V.R.. Farm Management. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1983.Google Scholar
Cameron, A.C. and Trivedi, P.K.. “Econometric Models Based on County Data: Comparisons and Applications of Some Estimators.J. Applied Econometrics, 1 (1986): 2954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, A.C. and Trivedi, P.K.. ”Regression-Based Tests for Overdispersion in the Poisson Model.J. Econometrics, 46(1990): 347363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
County Agents Directory. Niles, Illinois: Century Communications Inc., 1988.Google Scholar
Eck, Douglas W.A National Survey of Enterprise Budget Development and Use by the Extension Service.” M.S. thesis. Utah State University. Logan, Utah, 1990.Google Scholar
Hausman, J., Hall, B.H., and Greliches, Z.. “Econometric Models of Count Data with an Application to the Patents - R & D Relationship.Econometrica, 52(1984): 909938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, R.D. Farm Management Planning, Control, and Implementation. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1986.Google Scholar
Kinnear, Thomas C. and Taylor, James R.. Marketing Research: An Applied Approach New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979.Google Scholar
Klonsky, Karen.A National Survey of Enterprise Budget Development Methods.” Paper presented at the USDA ERS Conference on Economic Accounting for Commodity Costs and Returns. Kansas City, Missouri, February 20, 1991.Google Scholar
McElroy, R.G.Costs of Production.” Vol. 12, Major Statistical Series of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Washington, DC: USDA ERS, Agricultural Handbook No. 671. September 1987.Google Scholar
Morehart, Mitchell, Johnson, James and Shapouri, Hosein. “The National Commodity Cost and Return Estimates.” Paper presented at the USDA ERS Conference on Economic Accounting for Commodity Costs and Returns. Kansas City, Missouri. February 20, 1991.Google Scholar
Maddala, G.S. Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. London: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Olson, K.D., McGrann, J.M., and Nelson, T.R.. Using and Understanding Budgeting and the Microcomputer Budget Management System. Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M, 1985.Google Scholar
Edward, Rister M., Smith, Edward G., Richardson, James W., Knutson, Ronald D., Grant, Warren R., and Thompson, Troy N.. Texas Rice Production Costs. Agricultural and Food Policy Center Working Paper 89–8. Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University, November 1989.Google Scholar
Stigler, George J. The Theory of Price, 4th edition. New York: MacMillan Publishing Company, 1987.Google Scholar
Stigler, George J. The Organization of Industry. Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1970.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Statistics. Washington D.C., 1988.Google ScholarPubMed
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. Agricultural Census. Issues for various states, 1989.Google ScholarPubMed
2
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

An Evaluation of Cost of Production Information Usage by County Agents
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

An Evaluation of Cost of Production Information Usage by County Agents
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

An Evaluation of Cost of Production Information Usage by County Agents
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *