Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-l82ql Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T13:11:08.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

IL MODELLO SUD-EUROPEO Dl WELFARE STATE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2018

Un welfare del sud?

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Con il ritorno della democrazia e l'ingresso nella Comunità europea di Spagna, Portogallo e Grecia la visibilità dell'Europa meridionale è costantemente cresciuta nel corso dell'ultimo decennio. L'approssimarsi delle scadenze previste per l'Unione economico-monetaria e il dibattito sulla cosiddetta «dimensione sociale» hanno a loro volta attirato l'attenzione dei policy makers nazionali e sovranazionali verso gli specifici problemi e le prospettive dei sistemi di welfare dei paesi latini. L'idea sottostante a questo nuovo interesse è che tali sistemi siano caratterizzati da una eredità comune e che si trovino oggi a fronteggiare sfide «regionali» anch'esse comuni nel nuovo contesto post-Maastricht.

Summary

Summary

The article tries to identify some common traits of the welfare states of Italy, Spain, Portugal and Greece, with special attention to institutional and political aspects.

The main traits identified are: 1) a highly fragmented and «corporatist» income maintenance system, displaying a marked internal polarization: peaks of generosity (e.g, as regards pensions) accompanied by macroscopic gaps of protection; 2) the departure from corporatist traditions in the field of health care and the establishment (at least partially) of National Health Services based on universalistic principles; 3) a low degree of state penetration of the welfare sphere and a highly collusive mix between public and non public actors and institutions; 4) the persistence of clientelism and the formation - in some cases - of fairly elaborated «patronage machines» for the selective distribution of cash subsidies.

A number of factors are then discussed to explain these peculiarities of the Southern model. Among these: the historical weakness of the state apparatus in this area of Europe; the preminence of parties as main actors for interest articulation and aggregation; ideological polarizations and, in particular, the presence of a maximalist and divided Left.

In the last section, the article addresses the severe problems which are currently confronting - in various degrees - the four Southern European welfare states. Both the exogenous challenges, connected with market globalization and EMU, and the endogenous challenges (such as rapid ageing, mass unemployment etc.) are discussed. It is concluded that the adaptation of the Southern model to these challenges will be a very difficult process in the years ahead, in both social and political terms.

Type
Ricerche
Copyright
Copyright © Societ Italiana di Scienza Politica 

References

Riferimenti bibliografici

Ascoli, U. (1984), Il sistema italiano di welfare, in Ascoli, U. (a cura di), Welfare state all'italiana, Bari, Laterza, pp. 551.Google Scholar
Castles, F. (a cura di) (1989), The Comparative History of Public Policy, New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Castles, F. (a cura di) (1993), Family of Nations. Patterns of Public Policy in Western Democracies, Aldershot, Hants.Google Scholar
Castles, F. (1994), On Religion and Public Policy, in <European Journal of Political Research>, vol. 25, n. 1, pp. 1939.,+vol.+25,+n.+1,+pp.+19–39.>Google Scholar
Castles, F. (1995), Welfare State Development in Southern Europe, in <West European Politics>, vol. 18, n. 2, pp. 291313.Google Scholar
Cazorla, J. (1992), Del clientelismo tradicional al clientelismo de partido: evolucion y caracteristicas, Barcelona, Institut de Ciencies Politiques i Socials, WP n. 55. Google Scholar
Cazorla, J. (1994), El clientelismo de partido en España ante la opinion publica, Barcelona, Institut de Ciencies Politiques i Socials, WP n. 86.Google Scholar
Censis (1991), Rapporto sulla situazione sociale del paese, Roma, Censis.Google Scholar
Commissione europea (1993), La protezione sociale in Europa, Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Commissione europea (1995), European Economy, Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Cousins, C. (1995), Women and Social Policy in Spain: the Development of a Gendered Welfare Regime, in <Journal of European Social Policy>, n. 3, pp. 175197.,+n.+3,+pp.+175–197.>Google Scholar
Delia Porta, D. (1992), ho scambio occulto, Bologna, Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, S.N. e Roninger, L. (1984), Patrons, Clients and Friends, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Esping Andersen, G. (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, New York, Polity Press.Google Scholar
Eurostat (1994), Demographic Statistics, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Ferrera, M. (1984), Il welfare state in Italia, Bologna, Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Ferrera, M. (1990), Politica e riformismo sanitario in Italia, in Freddi, G. (a cura di), Medici e stato nel mondo occidentale, Bologna, Il Mulino, pp. 267285.Google Scholar
Ferrera, M. (1993a), Modelli di Solidarietà. Politica e riforme sociali nelle democrazie, Bologna, Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Ferrera, M. (1993b), EC Citizens and Social Protection, Brussels, European Commission.Google Scholar
Ferrera, M. (1995), The Rise and Pall of Democratic Universalism. Health Care Reform in Italy, 1978–1994, in <Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law>, vol. 20, n. 3, pp. 275302.Google Scholar
Ferrera, M. (1996), La partitocrazia della salute, in Cotta, M. e Isernia, P. (a cura di), Il gigante dai piedi d'argilla, Bologna, Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Flora, P. (a cura di) (1986/1987), Growth to Limits. The European Welfare States Since World War II, Berlin/New York, De Gruyter, 3 voll.Google Scholar
Flora, P. e Heidenheimer, A.J. (a cura di) (1981), The Development of Welfare States in Europe and North America, New Brunswick, Transaction (trad. it. Lo sviluppo del welfare state in Europa e America, Bologna, Il Mulino, 1983).Google Scholar
Freire, J.M. (1993), Cobertura Sanitaria y Equidad en España, in Actos del I Simposio Sobre Igualidad y Distribución de la Renta y la Riqueza, vol. VIII, Madrid, Fondación Argentaria, pp. 113137.Google Scholar
Giner, S. (1993), La modernización de la Europa Meridional, in D'Auria, E. e Casassas, J. (a cura di), El estado moderno en Italia y España, Barcelona, publicacions Universitat de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, P. (1995), Parentela, Clientela and the Republican State, relazione presentata al convegno su <Strutture e Metodi del Consenso nell'Italia Repubblicana>, Università di Pisa, aprile 1995., Università di Pisa, aprile 1995.' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Ginsborg,+P.+(1995),+Parentela,+Clientela+and+the+Republican+State,+relazione+presentata+al+convegno+su+,+Università+di+Pisa,+aprile+1995.>Google Scholar
Guillen, A.M. (1992), Social Policy in Spain: Prom Dictatorship to Democracy (1939–1982), in Ferge, Z. e Kolberg, J.E. (a cura di), Social Policy in a Changing Europe, Boulder, Westview Press, 1992, pp. 119142.Google Scholar
Gunther, R., Diamandouros, P.N. e Puhle, H.J. (a cura di) (1995), The Politics of Democratic Consolidation: Southern Europe in Comparative Perspective, Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Karantinos, D. et al. (1992), Greece, consolidated report for the Observatory on national policies to combat social exclusion, Brussels, European Commission.Google Scholar
Kersbergen, K. Van (1995), Social Capitalism, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Kertzer, D.I e Brettell, C.B. (1987), Recenti sviluppi nella storia della famiglia italiana e iberica, in <Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia>, n. 2, pp. 249289.,+n.+2,+pp.+249–289.>Google Scholar
Kohl, J. (1981), Trends and Problems in Postwar Public Expenditure Development, in P. Flora e A.J. Heidenheimer (a cura di), cit., pp. 367412.Google Scholar
Kosonen, P. (1994), European Integration: a Welfare State Perspective, Helsinky, University of Helsinky Sociology of Law Series n. 8.Google Scholar
Leibfried, S. (1992), Towards a European Welfare State, in Ferge, Z. e Kolberg, J.E. (a cura di), Social Policy in a Changing Europe, Boulder, Westview Press, pp. 345–279.Google Scholar
Lopez Novo, J. (1990), Spain's Welfare Tradition: a Developmental Perspective, Madrid, Instituto Juan March.Google Scholar
Mann, M. (1986), The Autonomous Power of the State: Its Origins, Mechanisms and Results, in Hall, J. (a cura di), States in History, Oxford, Blackwell, pp. 109136.Google Scholar
Maravall, J.M. (1992), What is Left? Social Democratic Policies in Southern Europe, working paper, Juan March Institute, Madrid.Google Scholar
MISSOC (1994), Social Protection in the Member States of the Community, Brussels, European Commission.Google Scholar
Moreno, L. e Sarasa, S. (1992), The Spanish Via Media to the Development of the Welfare State, working paper, Instituto de Estudios Sociales Avanzados, Madrid.Google Scholar
Mozzicafreddo, J. (1992), Portuguese Welfare State: Dimensions and Specific Features, relazione presentata al convegno su <Comparative Studies of Welfare State Development>, Università di Brema, Settembre.,+Università+di+Brema,+Settembre.>Google Scholar
OCSE (1993), Revenue Statistics 1965–1993, Paris.Google Scholar
OCSE (1994), New Orientations for Social Policy, Paris.Google Scholar
Orloff, A.S. (1993), The Politics of Pensions: A Comparative Analysis of Britain, Canada and the United States, Madison, University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Paci, M. (1984), Il sistema italiano di welfare tra tradizione clientelare e prospettive di riforma, in Ascoli, U. (a cura di), Welfare State all'italiana, Bari, Laterza, pp. 297326.Google Scholar
Paci, M. (1987), Pubblico e privato nel sistema italiano di welfare, in Lange, P. e Regini, M. (a cura di), Stato e regolazione sociale. Nuove prospettive sul caso italiano, Bologna, Il Mulino, pp. 271293.Google Scholar
Pappalardo, A. (1991a), Austerità conservatrice e rigore socialista: che differenza? I, in <Rivista italiana di scienza politica>, 1, pp. 3392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pappalardo, A. (1991b), Austerità conservatrice e rigore socialista: che differenza? II, in <Rivista italiana di scienza politica>, 2, pp. 255279.Google Scholar
Pereirinha, J. (1992), Portugal, consolidated report for the Observatory on national policies to combat social exclusion, Brussels, European Commission.Google Scholar
Perez Diaz, V. (1990), El Espectro del Neo-clientelismo, in <El País>, 5 giugno, pp. 1516.,+5+giugno,+pp.+15–16.>Google Scholar
Perez Diaz, V. e Rodriguez, J.C. (1994), Inertial Choices. Spanish Human Resources Policies and Practices, ASP research paper 2(b), Madrid.Google Scholar
Regonini, G. (1996), Partiti e pensioni: legami mancanti, in Cotta, M. e Isernia, P. (a cura di), Il gigante dai piedi d'argilla, Bologna, Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Room, G. et al. (1992), Second Annual Report, Observatory on national policies to combat social exclusion, Brussels, European Commission.Google Scholar
Saraceno, C. (1992), Italy, consolidated report for the Observatory on national policies to combat social exclusion, Brussels, European Commission.Google Scholar
Saraceno, C. (1994), The Ambivalent Familism of the Italian Welfare State, in <Social Politics>, n. 1, pp. 6082.,+n.+1,+pp.+60–82.>Google Scholar
Sarasa, S. (1995), Altruistic Associations and the Welfare State. A Comparative Perspective, relazione presentata al secondo convegno catalano di sociologia, Girona, aprile.Google Scholar
Shefter, M. (1977), Patronage and its Opponents: a Theory and Some European Cases, Ithaca, Center for International Studies, Western Societies Program Occasional Papers n. 8.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. (1992), Protecting Soldiers and Mothers, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stone, D. (1984), The Disabled State, Philadelphia, Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Veronese, P. (1994), Sistema politico e tutela dell'invalidità: il caso italiano, tesi di laurea, Università di Pavia, Facoltà di Scienze Politiche.Google Scholar