Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T00:57:19.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Time series regression results of suicide rates by social correlates for the USA and Northen Ireland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2014

David Lester ,
Peter S Curran  and
Bijou Yang
David Lester
Affiliation:
Richard Stockton State College, Pomona, NJ, USA
Peter S Curran
Affiliation:
Mater Infirmorum Hospital, Belfast, PA, USA
Bijou Yang
Affiliation:
Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A time series analysis of suicide in Northen Ireland and the USA for 1960 to 1984 revealed different correlates. Whereas divorce rates predicted national suicide rates in the USA, birth and marriage rates predicted suicide rates in Northern Ireland.

The major sociological theory proposed for understanding variations in national suicide rates was that of Durkheim. Durkheim proposed that two broad social characteristics were in large part responsible for the appearance of suicidal behaviour: social integration, the degree to which the people in a society were interconnected through social relationships, and social regulation, the degree to which the emotions and desires of people in the society were controlled and channeled by the social norms and customs.

Durkheim argued that suicide would be common when social integration was very strong (altruistic suicide) or very weak (egoistic suicide) and when social regulation was very strong (fatalistic suicide) or very weak (anomic suicide). Later theorists have argued that Durkheim placed more emphasis than was warranted on very strong social integration and regulation. Johnson argued, for example, that suicide would be more common when social integration and regulation were weak.

Type
Original Papers
Information
Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , March 1991 , pp. 26 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Clarke, RV, Lester, D. Suicide: closing the exits. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Curran, PS, Finlay, RJ, McGarry, PJ. Trends in suicide: N Ireland 1960-1986. Irish J Psychol Med 1988; 5: 98–102.Google Scholar
3.Doan, TA. Regression analysis of time series. Evanston, IL: Var Econometrics, 1988.Google Scholar
4.Douglas, JD. The social meanings of suicide. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
5.Durkhein, E. Le suicide. Paris: Felix Alcan, 1897.Google Scholar
6.Henry, AF, Short, JF. Suicide and homicide. New York: Free Press, 1954.Google Scholar
7.Johnson, BD. Durkheim's one cause of suicide. Amer Sociol Rev 1965; 30: 875–886.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Lester, D. Migration and suicide. Med J Australia 1972; 1: 941–942.Google ScholarPubMed
9.Lester, D. A regional analysis of suicide and homicide rates in the USA. Soc Psychiat Psychiat Epidemiol 1988; 23: 202–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Lester, D. Suicide from a sociological perspective. Springfield, IL: Charles Thomas, 1989.Google Scholar
11.Maddala, GS. Introduction to econometrics. London: Collier Macmillan, 1988.Google Scholar
12.Naroll, R. Data quality control. New York: Free Press, 1962.Google Scholar
13.Palmer, S. The violent society. New Haven: College & University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
14.Stack, S. The effect of female participation in the labour force on suicide. Sociol Forum 1987; 2: 257–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar